These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29768633)

  • 1. Evaluating the Efficiency and Safety of Speech Recognition within a Commercial Electronic Health Record System: A Replication Study.
    Hodgson T; Magrabi F; Coiera E
    Appl Clin Inform; 2018 Apr; 9(2):326-335. PubMed ID: 29768633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating the usability of speech recognition to create clinical documentation using a commercial electronic health record.
    Hodgson T; Magrabi F; Coiera E
    Int J Med Inform; 2018 May; 113():38-42. PubMed ID: 29602431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficiency and safety of speech recognition for documentation in the electronic health record.
    Hodgson T; Magrabi F; Coiera E
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2017 Nov; 24(6):1127-1133. PubMed ID: 29016971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Physician use of speech recognition versus typing in clinical documentation: A controlled observational study.
    Blackley SV; Schubert VD; Goss FR; Al Assad W; Garabedian PM; Zhou L
    Int J Med Inform; 2020 Sep; 141():104178. PubMed ID: 32521449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A clinician survey of using speech recognition for clinical documentation in the electronic health record.
    Goss FR; Blackley SV; Ortega CA; Kowalski LT; Landman AB; Lin CT; Meteer M; Bakes S; Gradwohl SC; Bates DW; Zhou L
    Int J Med Inform; 2019 Oct; 130():103938. PubMed ID: 31442847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Machine learning-based speech recognition system for nursing documentation - A pilot study.
    Lee TY; Li CC; Chou KR; Chung MH; Hsiao ST; Guo SL; Hung LY; Wu HT
    Int J Med Inform; 2023 Oct; 178():105213. PubMed ID: 37690224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Provider Adoption of Speech Recognition and its Impact on Satisfaction, Documentation Quality, Efficiency, and Cost in an Inpatient EHR.
    Saxena K; Diamond R; Conant RF; Mitchell TH; Gallopyn IG; Yakimow KE
    AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc; 2018; 2017():186-195. PubMed ID: 29888069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Speech recognition for clinical documentation from 1990 to 2018: a systematic review.
    Blackley SV; Huynh J; Wang L; Korach Z; Zhou L
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2019 Apr; 26(4):324-338. PubMed ID: 30753666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy and speed of electronic health record versus paper-based ophthalmic documentation strategies.
    Chan P; Thyparampil PJ; Chiang MF
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2013 Jul; 156(1):165-172.e2. PubMed ID: 23664152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of Speech Recognition on Problem Solving and Recall in Consumer Digital Health Tasks: Controlled Laboratory Experiment.
    Chen J; Lyell D; Laranjo L; Magrabi F
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 Jun; 22(6):e14827. PubMed ID: 32442129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Do you vape? Leveraging electronic health records to assess clinician documentation of electronic nicotine delivery system use among adolescents and adults.
    Young-Wolff KC; Klebaner D; Folck B; Carter-Harris L; Salloum RG; Prochaska JJ; Fogelberg R; Tan ASL
    Prev Med; 2017 Dec; 105():32-36. PubMed ID: 28823688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Incidence of speech recognition errors in the emergency department.
    Goss FR; Zhou L; Weiner SG
    Int J Med Inform; 2016 Sep; 93():70-3. PubMed ID: 27435949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of an electronic health record operating room management system in ophthalmology on documentation time, surgical volume, and staffing.
    Sanders DS; Read-Brown S; Tu DC; Lambert WE; Choi D; Almario BM; Yackel TR; Brown AS; Chiang MF
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2014 May; 132(5):586-92. PubMed ID: 24676217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electronic health record systems in ophthalmology: impact on clinical documentation.
    Sanders DS; Lattin DJ; Read-Brown S; Tu DC; Wilson DJ; Hwang TS; Morrison JC; Yackel TR; Chiang MF
    Ophthalmology; 2013 Sep; 120(9):1745-55. PubMed ID: 23683945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of Documentation Speed Using Web-Based Medical Speech Recognition Technology: Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Vogel M; Kaisers W; Wassmuth R; Mayatepek E
    J Med Internet Res; 2015 Nov; 17(11):e247. PubMed ID: 26531850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Progress of Speech Recognition in Health Care: Surgery as an Example.
    Aldosari B; Babsai R; Alanazi A; Aldosari H; Alanazi A
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2023 Jun; 305():414-418. PubMed ID: 37387053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Risks and benefits of speech recognition for clinical documentation: a systematic review.
    Hodgson T; Coiera E
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2016 Apr; 23(e1):e169-79. PubMed ID: 26578226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Time Spent on Dedicated Patient Care and Documentation Tasks Before and After the Introduction of a Structured and Standardized Electronic Health Record.
    Joukes E; Abu-Hanna A; Cornet R; de Keizer NF
    Appl Clin Inform; 2018 Jan; 9(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 29342479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Follow-Up Survey on Functionality of Nutrition Documentation and Ordering Nutrition Therapy in Currently Available Electronic Health Record Systems.
    Vanek VW; Ayers P; Charney P; Kraft M; Mitchell R; Plogsted S; Soden J; Van Way CW; Wessel J; Winter J; Kent S; Turner P; Bouche J; Quirk D; Seidner DL
    Nutr Clin Pract; 2016 Jun; 31(3):401-15. PubMed ID: 26920644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impacts of structuring the electronic health record: Results of a systematic literature review from the perspective of secondary use of patient data.
    Vuokko R; Mäkelä-Bengs P; Hyppönen H; Lindqvist M; Doupi P
    Int J Med Inform; 2017 Jan; 97():293-303. PubMed ID: 27919387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.