205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29768660)
1. Validation of a computerized algorithm to quantify fetal heart rate deceleration area.
Gyllencreutz E; Lu K; Lindecrantz K; Lindqvist PG; Nordstrom L; Holzmann M; Abtahi F
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2018 Sep; 97(9):1137-1147. PubMed ID: 29768660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interobserver agreement in CTG interpretation using the 2015 FIGO guidelines for intrapartum fetal monitoring.
Rei M; Tavares S; Pinto P; Machado AP; Monteiro S; Costa A; Costa-Santos C; Bernardes J; Ayres-De-Campos D
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Oct; 205():27-31. PubMed ID: 27566218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Variable deceleration features and intrapartum fetal acidemia - The role of deceleration area.
Gyllencreutz E; Varli IH; Lindqvist PG; Holzmann M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Dec; 267():192-197. PubMed ID: 34826666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The present and future of intrapartum computerized cardiotocography: role of pattern recognition incorporating single vs. multiple parameters.
Sholapurkar SL
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Dec; 35(25):7452-7458. PubMed ID: 34402369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The development and validation of an algorithm for real-time computerised fetal heart rate monitoring in labour.
Taylor GM; Mires GJ; Abel EW; Tsantis S; Farrell T; Chien PF; Liu Y
BJOG; 2000 Sep; 107(9):1130-7. PubMed ID: 11002957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Relationship between computerized cardiotocography and perinatal outcomes].
Liu W; Li X; Tang D
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Oct; 36(10):581-4. PubMed ID: 16134517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. eCTG: an automatic procedure to extract digital cardiotocographic signals from digital images.
Sbrollini A; Agostinelli A; Marcantoni I; Morettini M; Burattini L; Di Nardo F; Fioretti S; Burattini L
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Mar; 156():133-139. PubMed ID: 29428065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Computerized analysis of the fetal heart rate in pregnancies complicated by preterm premature rupture of membranes (pPROM).
Buscicchio G; Giannubilo SR; Bezzeccheri V; Scagnoli C; Rinci A; Tranquilli AL
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2006 Jan; 19(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 16492590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fetal heart rate tracings: observers versus computer assessment.
Todros T; Preve CU; Plazzotta C; Biolcati M; Lombardo P
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1996 Sep; 68(1-2):83-6. PubMed ID: 8886686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of a novel computerized analysis program and visual interpretation of cardiotocography.
Chen CY; Yu C; Chang CC; Lin CW
PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e112296. PubMed ID: 25437442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The intrapartum deceleration in center stage: a physiologic approach to the interpretation of fetal heart rate changes in labor.
Westgate JA; Wibbens B; Bennet L; Wassink G; Parer JT; Gunn AJ
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Sep; 197(3):236.e1-11. PubMed ID: 17826402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of visual analyses of intrapartum fetal heart rate tracings according to the new national institute of child health and human development guidelines with computer analyses by an automated fetal heart rate monitoring system.
Devoe L; Golde S; Kilman Y; Morton D; Shea K; Waller J
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Aug; 183(2):361-6. PubMed ID: 10942470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Variable decelerations: do size and shape matter?
Hamilton E; Warrick P; O'Keeffe D
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2012 Jun; 25(6):648-53. PubMed ID: 21801143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Pre-partum cardiotocography: comparison between the traditional and the computed systems].
Soncini E; Grignaffini A; Vadora E
Acta Biomed Ateneo Parmense; 2000; 71 Suppl 1():337-43. PubMed ID: 11424766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Phase-rectified signal averaging method to predict perinatal outcome in infants with very preterm fetal growth restriction- a secondary analysis of TRUFFLE-trial.
Lobmaier SM; Mensing van Charante N; Ferrazzi E; Giussani DA; Shaw CJ; Müller A; Ortiz JU; Ostermayer E; Haller B; Prefumo F; Frusca T; Hecher K; Arabin B; Thilaganathan B; Papageorghiou AT; Bhide A; Martinelli P; Duvekot JJ; van Eyck J; Visser GH; Schmidt G; Ganzevoort W; Lees CC; Schneider KT;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):630.e1-630.e7. PubMed ID: 27343566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Deceleration area of fetal heart rate trace and fetal acidemia at delivery: a case-control study.
Giannubilo SR; Buscicchio G; Gentilucci L; Palla GP; Tranquilli AL
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2007 Feb; 20(2):141-4. PubMed ID: 17437212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Development and evaluation of an algorithm for computer analysis of maternal heart rate during labor.
Pinto P; Bernardes J; Costa-Santos C; Amorim-Costa C; Silva M; Ayres-de-Campos D
Comput Biol Med; 2014 Jun; 49():30-5. PubMed ID: 24727565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Toward quantitative fetal heart rate monitoring.
Cao H; Lake DE; Ferguson JE; Chisholm CA; Griffin MP; Moorman JR
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Jan; 53(1):111-8. PubMed ID: 16402610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interobserver reliability to interpret intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: Does a standardized algorithm improve agreement among clinicians?
Uccella S; Cromi A; Colombo GF; Bogani G; Casarin J; Agosti M; Ghezzi F
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2015 Apr; 35(3):241-5. PubMed ID: 25254299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Basic principles of the foetal heart rate during delivery without hypoxia and acidosis.
Roemer VM; Walden R
Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2012 Feb; 216(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 22331523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
