325 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29769209)
1. Time-to-Event Bayesian Optimal Interval Design to Accelerate Phase I Trials.
Yuan Y; Lin R; Li D; Nie L; Warren KE
Clin Cancer Res; 2018 Oct; 24(20):4921-4930. PubMed ID: 29769209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. TITE-BOIN-ET: Time-to-event Bayesian optimal interval design to accelerate dose-finding based on both efficacy and toxicity outcomes.
Takeda K; Morita S; Taguri M
Pharm Stat; 2020 May; 19(3):335-349. PubMed ID: 31829517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bayesian Optimal Interval Design: A Simple and Well-Performing Design for Phase I Oncology Trials.
Yuan Y; Hess KR; Hilsenbeck SG; Gilbert MR
Clin Cancer Res; 2016 Sep; 22(17):4291-301. PubMed ID: 27407096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy, Safety, and Reliability of Novel Phase I Trial Designs.
Zhou H; Yuan Y; Nie L
Clin Cancer Res; 2018 Sep; 24(18):4357-4364. PubMed ID: 29661774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A new pragmatic design for dose escalation in phase 1 clinical trials using an adaptive continual reassessment method.
North B; Kocher HM; Sasieni P
BMC Cancer; 2019 Jun; 19(1):632. PubMed ID: 31242873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Escalation with overdose control using all toxicities and time to event toxicity data in cancer Phase I clinical trials.
Chen Z; Cui Y; Owonikoko TK; Wang Z; Li Z; Luo R; Kutner M; Khuri FR; Kowalski J
Contemp Clin Trials; 2014 Mar; 37(2):322-32. PubMed ID: 24530487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Designing dose-escalation trials with late-onset toxicities using the time-to-event continual reassessment method.
Normolle D; Lawrence T
J Clin Oncol; 2006 Sep; 24(27):4426-33. PubMed ID: 16983110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A utility-based Bayesian optimal interval (U-BOIN) phase I/II design to identify the optimal biological dose for targeted and immune therapies.
Zhou Y; Lee JJ; Yuan Y
Stat Med; 2019 Dec; 38(28):5299-5316. PubMed ID: 31621952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Practical modifications to the time-to-event continual reassessment method for phase I cancer trials with fast patient accrual and late-onset toxicities.
Polley MY
Stat Med; 2011 Jul; 30(17):2130-43. PubMed ID: 21590790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. TITE-gBOIN: Time-to-event Bayesian optimal interval design to accelerate dose-finding accounting for toxicity grades.
Takeda K; Xia Q; Liu S; Rong A
Pharm Stat; 2022 Mar; 21(2):496-506. PubMed ID: 34862715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Rolling continual reassessment method with overdose control: An efficient and safe dose escalation design.
Zhu J; Sabanés Bové D; Liao Z; Beyer U; Yung G; Sarkar S
Contemp Clin Trials; 2021 Aug; 107():106436. PubMed ID: 34000410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. TITE-BOIN12: A Bayesian phase I/II trial design to find the optimal biological dose with late-onset toxicity and efficacy.
Zhou Y; Lin R; Lee JJ; Li D; Wang L; Li R; Yuan Y
Stat Med; 2022 May; 41(11):1918-1931. PubMed ID: 35098585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Two-stage subgroup-specific time-to-event (2S-Sub-TITE): An adaptive two-stage time-to-toxicity design for subgroup-specific dose finding in phase I oncology trials.
McGovern A; Chapple AG; Ma C
Pharm Stat; 2022 Nov; 21(6):1138-1148. PubMed ID: 35560864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The superiority of the time-to-event continual reassessment method to the rolling six design in pediatric oncology Phase I trials.
Zhao L; Lee J; Mody R; Braun TM
Clin Trials; 2011 Aug; 8(4):361-9. PubMed ID: 21610004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. TITE-gBOIN-ET: Time-to-event generalized Bayesian optimal interval design to accelerate dose-finding accounting for ordinal graded efficacy and toxicity outcomes.
Takeda K; Yamaguchi Y; Taguri M; Morita S
Biom J; 2023 Oct; 65(7):e2200265. PubMed ID: 37309248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Handling Incomplete or Late-Onset Toxicities in Early-Phase Dose-Finding Clinical Trials: Current Practice and Future Prospects.
Yin Z; Mander AP; de Bono JS; Zheng H; Yap C
JCO Precis Oncol; 2024 Jan; 8():e2300441. PubMed ID: 38181316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A novel framework of Bayesian optimal interval design for phase I trials with late-onset toxicities.
Zhou H; Chen C; Sun L; Zeng Z
Contemp Clin Trials; 2021 Jun; 105():106404. PubMed ID: 33862287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The 3 + 3 design in dose-finding studies with small sample sizes: Pitfalls and possible remedies.
Chiuzan C; Dehbi HM
Clin Trials; 2024 Jun; 21(3):350-357. PubMed ID: 38618916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Systematic comparison of the statistical operating characteristics of various Phase I oncology designs.
Ananthakrishnan R; Green S; Chang M; Doros G; Massaro J; LaValley M
Contemp Clin Trials Commun; 2017 Mar; 5():34-48. PubMed ID: 29740620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Adaptive design for identifying maximum tolerated dose early to accelerate dose-finding trial.
Kojima M
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Apr; 22(1):97. PubMed ID: 35382745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
