BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29769282)

  • 1. Inferring the Probability of the Derived
    Keightley PD; Jackson BC
    Genetics; 2018 Jul; 209(3):897-906. PubMed ID: 29769282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Distinguishing Among Evolutionary Forces Acting on Genome-Wide Base Composition: Computer Simulation Analysis of Approximate Methods for Inferring Site Frequency Spectra of Derived Mutations.
    Matsumoto T; Akashi H
    G3 (Bethesda); 2018 May; 8(5):1755-1769. PubMed ID: 29588382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relative efficiencies of the maximum-likelihood, neighbor-joining, and maximum-parsimony methods when substitution rate varies with site.
    Tateno Y; Takezaki N; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1994 Mar; 11(2):261-77. PubMed ID: 8170367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inferring the Frequency Spectrum of Derived Variants to Quantify Adaptive Molecular Evolution in Protein-Coding Genes of Drosophila melanogaster.
    Keightley PD; Campos JL; Booker TR; Charlesworth B
    Genetics; 2016 Jun; 203(2):975-84. PubMed ID: 27098912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tree rooting with outgroups when they differ in their nucleotide composition from the ingroup: the Drosophila saltans and willistoni groups, a case study.
    Tarrío R; Rodríguez-Trelles F; Ayala FJ
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2000 Sep; 16(3):344-9. PubMed ID: 10991788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of Ancestral Sequence Reconstruction Methods to Infer Nonstationary Patterns of Nucleotide Substitution.
    Matsumoto T; Akashi H; Yang Z
    Genetics; 2015 Jul; 200(3):873-90. PubMed ID: 25948563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ancestral sequence reconstruction in primate mitochondrial DNA: compositional bias and effect on functional inference.
    Krishnan NM; Seligmann H; Stewart CB; De Koning AP; Pollock DD
    Mol Biol Evol; 2004 Oct; 21(10):1871-83. PubMed ID: 15229290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ancestral Sequence Reconstruction with Maximum Parsimony.
    Herbst L; Fischer M
    Bull Math Biol; 2017 Dec; 79(12):2865-2886. PubMed ID: 28993971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ancestral sequence alignment under optimal conditions.
    Hudek AK; Brown DG
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Nov; 6():273. PubMed ID: 16293191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ancestral inference and the study of codon bias evolution: implications for molecular evolutionary analyses of the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup.
    Akashi H; Goel P; John A
    PLoS One; 2007 Oct; 2(10):e1065. PubMed ID: 17957249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracies of ancestral amino acid sequences inferred by the parsimony, likelihood, and distance methods.
    Zhang J; Nei M
    J Mol Evol; 1997; 44 Suppl 1():S139-46. PubMed ID: 9071022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Determining the evolutionary history of gene families.
    Ames RM; Money D; Ghatge VP; Whelan S; Lovell SC
    Bioinformatics; 2012 Jan; 28(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 22039210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A new method of inference of ancestral nucleotide and amino acid sequences.
    Yang Z; Kumar S; Nei M
    Genetics; 1995 Dec; 141(4):1641-50. PubMed ID: 8601501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparative study in ancestral range reconstruction methods: retracing the uncertain histories of insular lineages.
    Clark JR; Ree RH; Alfaro ME; King MG; Wagner WL; Roalson EH
    Syst Biol; 2008 Oct; 57(5):693-707. PubMed ID: 18853357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cases in which ancestral maximum likelihood will be confusingly misleading.
    Handelman T; Chor B
    J Theor Biol; 2017 May; 420():318-323. PubMed ID: 28263816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Approximate methods for estimating the pattern of nucleotide substitution and the variation of substitution rates among sites.
    Yang Z; Kumar S
    Mol Biol Evol; 1996 May; 13(5):650-9. PubMed ID: 8676739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dollo Parsimony Overestimates Ancestral Gene Content Reconstructions.
    Gàlvez-Morante A; Guéguen L; Natsidis P; Telford MJ; Richter DJ
    Genome Biol Evol; 2024 Apr; 16(4):. PubMed ID: 38518756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of models for nucleotide substitution used in maximum-likelihood phylogenetic estimation.
    Yang Z; Goldman N; Friday A
    Mol Biol Evol; 1994 Mar; 11(2):316-24. PubMed ID: 8170371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Choosing the best ancestral character state reconstruction method.
    Royer-Carenzi M; Pontarotti P; Didier G
    Math Biosci; 2013 Mar; 242(1):95-109. PubMed ID: 23276531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. New methods for detecting positive selection at single amino acid sites.
    Suzuki Y
    J Mol Evol; 2004 Jul; 59(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 15383903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.