These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29769366)

  • 1. Mate choice in the eye and ear of the beholder? Female multimodal sensory configuration influences her preferences.
    Ronald KL; Fernández-Juricic E; Lucas JR
    Proc Biol Sci; 2018 May; 285(1878):. PubMed ID: 29769366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The sensory substrate of multimodal communication in brown-headed cowbirds: are females sensory 'specialists' or 'generalists'?
    Ronald KL; Sesterhenn TM; Fernandez-Juricic E; Lucas JR
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2017 Nov; 203(11):935-943. PubMed ID: 28819686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. fMRI Reveals a Novel Region for Evaluating Acoustic Information for Mate Choice in a Female Songbird.
    Van Ruijssevelt L; Chen Y; von Eugen K; Hamaide J; De Groof G; Verhoye M; Güntürkün O; Woolley SC; Van der Linden A
    Curr Biol; 2018 Mar; 28(5):711-721.e6. PubMed ID: 29478859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Auditory processing neurons influence song evaluation and strength of mate preference in female songbirds.
    Lawley KS; Fenn T; Person E; Huber H; Zaharas K; Smith P; Coulter A; Prather JF
    Front Neural Circuits; 2022; 16():994548. PubMed ID: 36262747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relative weighting of acoustic information during mating decisions in grasshoppers indicates signatures of sexual selection.
    Clemens J; Aufderheide J; Ronacher B
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2017 Nov; 203(11):891-901. PubMed ID: 28733816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Testing a key assumption in animal communication: between-individual variation in female visual systems alters perception of male signals.
    Ronald KL; Ensminger AL; Shawkey MD; Lucas JR; Fernández-Juricic E
    Biol Open; 2017 Dec; 6(12):1771-1783. PubMed ID: 29247048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sex differences in auditory filters of brown-headed cowbirds (Molothrus ater).
    Gall MD; Lucas JR
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2010 Aug; 196(8):559-67. PubMed ID: 20559641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Exploring the hidden landscape of female preferences for complex signals.
    Reichert MS; Finck J; Ronacher B
    Evolution; 2017 Apr; 71(4):1009-1024. PubMed ID: 28186332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Noise affects mate choice based on visual information via cross-sensory interference.
    Zhu B; Zhang H; Chen Q; He Q; Zhao X; Sun X; Wang T; Wang J; Cui J
    Environ Pollut; 2022 Sep; 308():119680. PubMed ID: 35787421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Temperature coupling of mate attraction signals and female mate preferences in four populations of Enchenopa treehopper (Hemiptera: Membracidae).
    Jocson DMI; Smeester ME; Leith NT; Macchiano A; Fowler-Finn KD
    J Evol Biol; 2019 Oct; 32(10):1046-1056. PubMed ID: 31278803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mate preference in the painted goby: the influence of visual and acoustic courtship signals.
    Amorim MC; da Ponte AN; Caiano M; Pedroso SS; Pereira R; Fonseca PJ
    J Exp Biol; 2013 Nov; 216(Pt 21):3996-4004. PubMed ID: 23948469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Light is required for proper female mate choice between winged and wingless males in Drosophila.
    Watanabe K; Suzuki Y; Inami S; Ohashi H; Sakai T
    Genes Genet Syst; 2018 Oct; 93(3):119-123. PubMed ID: 29998908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Social transmission of courtship behavior and mating preferences in brown-headed cowbirds, Molothrus ater.
    Freeberg TM
    Learn Behav; 2004 Feb; 32(1):122-30. PubMed ID: 15161147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Complex sensory environments alter mate choice outcomes.
    Taylor RC; Wilhite KO; Ludovici RJ; Mitchell KM; Halfwerk W; Page RA; Ryan MJ; Hunter KL
    J Exp Biol; 2021 Jan; 224(Pt 1):. PubMed ID: 33188061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences.
    Jennions MD; Petrie M
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 1997 May; 72(2):283-327. PubMed ID: 9155244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neurobiology of Female Mate Choice in Frogs: Auditory Filtering and Valuation.
    Burmeister SS
    Integr Comp Biol; 2017 Oct; 57(4):857-864. PubMed ID: 29048536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multimodal signals: enhancement and constraint of song motor patterns by visual display.
    Cooper BG; Goller F
    Science; 2004 Jan; 303(5657):544-6. PubMed ID: 14739462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Female perception of cowbird song: a closed developmental program.
    King AP; West MJ
    Dev Psychobiol; 1983 Jul; 16(4):335-42. PubMed ID: 6884582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sexual and non-sexual social preferences in male and female white-eyed bulbuls.
    Kabasakal B; Poláček M; Aslan A; Hoi H; Erdoğan A; Griggio M
    Sci Rep; 2017 Jul; 7(1):5847. PubMed ID: 28724892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cultural influences on female mate choice: an experimental test in cowbirds, Molothrus ater.
    Freeberg TM; Duncan SD; Kast TL; Enstrom DA
    Anim Behav; 1999 Feb; 57(2):421-426. PubMed ID: 10049482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.