171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29770179)
1. Biomechanical comparison between titanium and cobalt chromium rods used in a pedicle subtraction osteotomy model.
Shah KN; Walker G; Koruprolu SC; Daniels AH
Orthop Rev (Pavia); 2018 Mar; 10(1):7541. PubMed ID: 29770179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of Supplemental Short Pre-Contoured Accessory Rods and Cobalt Chrome Alloy Posterior Rods Reduces Primary Rod Strain and Range of Motion Across the Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy Level: An In Vitro Biomechanical Study.
Hallager DW; Gehrchen M; Dahl B; Harris JA; Gudipally M; Jenkins S; Wu AM; Bucklen BS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Apr; 41(7):E388-95. PubMed ID: 27018904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical analysis of cervicothoracic junction osteotomy in cadaveric model of ankylosing spondylitis: effect of rod material and diameter.
Scheer JK; Tang JA; Deviren V; Acosta F; Buckley JM; Pekmezci M; McClellan RT; Ames CP
J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Mar; 14(3):330-5. PubMed ID: 21235305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Preventing Instrumentation Failure in Three-Column Spinal Osteotomy: Biomechanical Analysis of Rod Configuration.
Jager ZS; İnceoğlu S; Palmer D; Akpolat YT; Cheng WK
Spine Deform; 2016 Jan; 4(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 27852497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative Study Between Cobalt Chrome and Titanium Alloy Rods for Multilevel Spinal Fusion: Proximal Junctional Kyphosis More Frequently Occurred in Patients Having Cobalt Chrome Rods.
Han S; Hyun SJ; Kim KJ; Jahng TA; Kim HJ
World Neurosurg; 2017 Jul; 103():404-409. PubMed ID: 28427980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comprehensive In Silico Evaluation of Accessory Rod Position, Rod Material and Diameter, Use of Cross-connectors, and Anterior Column Support in a Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy Model: Part II: Effects on Lumbosacral Rod and Screw Strain.
Jazini E; Gelb DE; Tareen J; Ludwig SC; Harris JA; Amin DB; Wang W; Van Horn MR; Patel PD; Mirabile BA; Bucklen BS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2021 Jan; 46(1):E12-E22. PubMed ID: 33315361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The fatigue life of contoured cobalt chrome posterior spinal fusion rods.
Nguyen TQ; Buckley JM; Ames C; Deviren V
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2011 Feb; 225(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 21428153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comprehensive Evaluation of Accessory Rod Position, Rod Material and Diameter, Use of Cross-connectors, and Anterior Column Support in a Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy Model: Part I: Effects on Apical Rod Strain: An In Vitro and In Silico Biomechanical Study.
Gelb DE; Tareen J; Jazini E; Ludwig SC; Harris JA; Amin DB; Wang W; Van Horn MR; Patel PD; Mirabile BA; Bucklen BS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2021 Jan; 46(1):E1-E11. PubMed ID: 33315360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimal satellite rod constructs to mitigate rod failure following pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO): a finite element study.
Seyed Vosoughi A; Joukar A; Kiapour A; Parajuli D; Agarwal AK; Goel VK; Zavatsky J
Spine J; 2019 May; 19(5):931-941. PubMed ID: 30414992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Outrigger rod technique for supplemental support of posterior spinal arthrodesis.
Palumbo MA; Shah KN; Eberson CP; Hart RA; Daniels AH
Spine J; 2015 Jun; 15(6):1409-14. PubMed ID: 25771756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of Electrocautery on Fatigue Life of Spinal Fusion Constructs-An In Vitro Biomechanical Study.
Almansour H; Sonntag R; Pepke W; Bruckner T; Kretzer JP; Akbar M
Materials (Basel); 2019 Aug; 12(15):. PubMed ID: 31382555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Effect of Contouring on Fatigue Strength of Spinal Rods: Is it Okay to Re-bend and Which Materials Are Best?
Slivka MA; Fan YK; Eck JC
Spine Deform; 2013 Nov; 1(6):395-400. PubMed ID: 27927364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Spinal rod gripping capacity: how do 5.5/6.0-mm dual-diameter screws compare?
Kluck DG; Farnsworth CL; Jeffords ME; Marino NE; Yaszay B; Upasani VV; Newton PO
Spine Deform; 2020 Feb; 8(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 31960354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cobalt-chrome and titanium alloy rods provide similar coronal and sagittal correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Sabah Y; Clément JL; Solla F; Rosello O; Rampal V
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2018 Nov; 104(7):1073-1077. PubMed ID: 30193983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Would CoCr rods provide better correctional forces than stainless steel or titanium for rigid scoliosis curves?
Serhan H; Mhatre D; Newton P; Giorgio P; Sturm P
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2013 Apr; 26(2):E70-4. PubMed ID: 22832558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical analysis of sagittal correction parameters for surgical instrumentation with pedicle subtraction osteotomy in adult spinal deformity.
Benoit D; Wang X; Crandall DG; Aubin CÉ
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2020 Jan; 71():45-52. PubMed ID: 31689644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical comparison of multi-rod constructs by satellite rod configurations (in-line vs. lateral) and screw types (monoaxial vs. polyaxial) spanning a lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO): is there an optimal configuration?
Shekouhi N; Vosoughi AS; Zavatsky JM; Goel VK; Theologis AA
Eur Spine J; 2022 Nov; 31(11):3050-3059. PubMed ID: 35932334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effects of rod contouring on spinal construct fatigue strength.
Lindsey C; Deviren V; Xu Z; Yeh RF; Puttlitz CM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Jul; 31(15):1680-7. PubMed ID: 16816763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Rod stiffness as a risk factor of proximal junctional kyphosis after adult spinal deformity surgery: comparative study between cobalt chrome multiple-rod constructs and titanium alloy two-rod constructs.
Han S; Hyun SJ; Kim KJ; Jahng TA; Lee S; Rhim SC
Spine J; 2017 Jul; 17(7):962-968. PubMed ID: 28242335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical Analysis of 2 Versus 4 Rods Across the Cervicothoracic Junction in a Human Cadaveric Model.
Pivazyan G; Winters CG; Brooks DM; Sandhu FA; Cunningham BW
Neurosurgery; 2024 Jan; 94(1):217-225. PubMed ID: 37706689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
