365 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29770280)
21. Is Body Mass Index a Risk Factor for Revision Procedures After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion?
Narain AS; Hijji FY; Bohl DD; Yom KH; Kudaravalli KT; Singh K
Clin Spine Surg; 2018 Feb; 31(1):E85-E91. PubMed ID: 28538081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Time Course Observation of Outcomes between Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
Lin GX; Park CK; Hur JW; Kim JS
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo); 2019 Jun; 59(6):222-230. PubMed ID: 31068542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion vs. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Gao QY; Wei FL; Li T; Zhu KL; Du MR; Heng W; Yang F; Gao HR; Qian JX; Zhou CP
Front Med (Lausanne); 2022; 9():829426. PubMed ID: 35665352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of clinical outcomes among obese patients.
Terman SW; Yee TJ; Lau D; Khan AA; La Marca F; Park P
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Jun; 20(6):644-52. PubMed ID: 24745355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Transfacet Oblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technical Description and Early Results.
Abbasi H; Storlie NR; Aya KL
Cureus; 2022 Jul; 14(7):e26533. PubMed ID: 35928391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Comparison of minimally invasive using a tubular retraction system versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases].
Luo Z; Rao H; Huang D; Li G; Liu C; Dong S; Tian J
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2015 Sep; 95(33):2681-5. PubMed ID: 26711822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Spondylolisthesis: Comparison Between Isthmic and Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.
Kim JY; Park JY; Kim KH; Kuh SU; Chin DK; Kim KS; Cho YE
World Neurosurg; 2015 Nov; 84(5):1284-93. PubMed ID: 26072461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with expandable versus static interbody devices: radiographic assessment of sagittal segmental and pelvic parameters.
Hawasli AH; Khalifeh JM; Chatrath A; Yarbrough CK; Ray WZ
Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E10. PubMed ID: 28760032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Minimally invasive dorsal decompression-stabilization surgery in patients with overweight and obesity].
Byval'tsev VA; Kalinin AA
Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko; 2018; 82(5):69-80. PubMed ID: 30412159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Multilevel: Comparison with Conventional Transforaminal Interbody Fusion.
Lee WC; Park JY; Kim KH; Kuh SU; Chin DK; Kim KS; Cho YE
World Neurosurg; 2016 Jan; 85():236-43. PubMed ID: 26386459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Minimally invasive versus open fusion for Grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database.
Mummaneni PV; Bisson EF; Kerezoudis P; Glassman S; Foley K; Slotkin JR; Potts E; Shaffrey M; Shaffrey CI; Coric D; Knightly J; Park P; Fu KM; Devin CJ; Chotai S; Chan AK; Virk M; Asher AL; Bydon M
Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E11. PubMed ID: 28760035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Assessment of radiographic and clinical outcomes of an articulating expandable interbody cage in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis.
Massie LW; Zakaria HM; Schultz LR; Basheer A; Buraimoh MA; Chang V
Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Jan; 44(1):E8. PubMed ID: 29290133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Clinical and Radiographic Comparisons among Minimally Invasive Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Comparison with Three-Way Matching.
Yingsakmongkol W; Jitpakdee K; Varakornpipat P; Choentrakool C; Tanasansomboon T; Limthongkul W; Singhatanadgige W; Kotheeranurak V
Asian Spine J; 2022 Oct; 16(5):712-722. PubMed ID: 35065546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Minimally invasive surgery for degenerative spondylolisthesis: transforaminal or oblique lumbar interbody fusion.
Sheng SR; Geng YB; Zhou KL; Wu AM; Wang XY; Ni WF
J Comp Eff Res; 2020 Jan; 9(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 31838875
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy: Revision Surgery for Recurrent Herniation After Microendoscopic Discectomy.
Yao Y; Zhang H; Wu J; Liu H; Zhang Z; Tang Y; Zhou Y
World Neurosurg; 2017 Mar; 99():89-95. PubMed ID: 27919762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Lumbar Fusion: A Comparison of Blood Loss, Surgical Complications, and Hospital Course.
Patel AA; Zfass-Mendez M; Lebwohl NH; Wang MY; Green BA; Levi AD; Vanni S; Williams SK
Iowa Orthop J; 2015; 35():130-4. PubMed ID: 26361455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Comparison of short-term effectiveness between minimally invasive surgery- and open-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for single-level lumbar degenerative disease].
Yang J; Kong Q; Song Y; Liu H; Zeng J
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Mar; 27(3):262-7. PubMed ID: 23672121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of Preliminary clinical outcomes between percutaneous endoscopic and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases in a tertiary hospital: Is percutaneous endoscopic procedure superior to MIS-TLIF? A prospective cohort study.
Ao S; Zheng W; Wu J; Tang Y; Zhang C; Zhou Y; Li C
Int J Surg; 2020 Apr; 76():136-143. PubMed ID: 32165279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Single-Level Endoscopic TLIF Has Decreased Surgery Duration, Blood Loss, and Length of Hospital Stay While Achieving Similar 1-Year Clinical and Radiological Outcomes Compared With Conventional Minimally Invasive TLIF.
Sim DS; Sim CHS; Jiang L; Ling ZM
Int J Spine Surg; 2023 Jun; 17(3):380-386. PubMed ID: 37315991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Complication rates associated with open versus percutaneous pedicle screw instrumentation among patients undergoing minimally invasive interbody fusion for adult spinal deformity.
Than KD; Mummaneni PV; Bridges KJ; Tran S; Park P; Chou D; La Marca F; Uribe JS; Vogel TD; Nunley PD; Eastlack RK; Anand N; Okonkwo DO; Kanter AS; Mundis GM
Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Dec; 43(6):E7. PubMed ID: 29191098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
