4536 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29771313)
1. Evaluating the potential role of pleiotropy in Mendelian randomization studies.
Hemani G; Bowden J; Davey Smith G
Hum Mol Genet; 2018 Aug; 27(R2):R195-R208. PubMed ID: 29771313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Detection of widespread horizontal pleiotropy in causal relationships inferred from Mendelian randomization between complex traits and diseases.
Verbanck M; Chen CY; Neale B; Do R
Nat Genet; 2018 May; 50(5):693-698. PubMed ID: 29686387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Exploiting horizontal pleiotropy to search for causal pathways within a Mendelian randomization framework.
Cho Y; Haycock PC; Sanderson E; Gaunt TR; Zheng J; Morris AP; Davey Smith G; Hemani G
Nat Commun; 2020 Feb; 11(1):1010. PubMed ID: 32081875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Implementing MR-PRESSO and GCTA-GSMR for pleiotropy assessment in Mendelian randomization studies from a practitioner's perspective.
Ong JS; MacGregor S
Genet Epidemiol; 2019 Sep; 43(6):609-616. PubMed ID: 31045282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Exploring and mitigating potential bias when genetic instrumental variables are associated with multiple non-exposure traits in Mendelian randomization.
Yang Q; Sanderson E; Tilling K; Borges MC; Lawlor DA
Eur J Epidemiol; 2022 Jul; 37(7):683-700. PubMed ID: 35622304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Weak and pleiotropy robust sex-stratified Mendelian randomization in the one sample and two sample settings.
Karageorgiou V; Tyrrell J; Mckinley TJ; Bowden J
Genet Epidemiol; 2023 Mar; 47(2):135-151. PubMed ID: 36682072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mendelian randomization for causal inference accounting for pleiotropy and sample structure using genome-wide summary statistics.
Hu X; Zhao J; Lin Z; Wang Y; Peng H; Zhao H; Wan X; Yang C
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Jul; 119(28):e2106858119. PubMed ID: 35787050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Constrained instruments and their application to Mendelian randomization with pleiotropy.
Jiang L; Oualkacha K; Didelez V; Ciampi A; Rosa-Neto P; Benedet AL; Mathotaarachchi S; Richards JB; Greenwood CMT;
Genet Epidemiol; 2019 Jun; 43(4):373-401. PubMed ID: 30635941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Genetically determined serum urate levels and cardiovascular and other diseases in UK Biobank cohort: A phenome-wide mendelian randomization study.
Li X; Meng X; He Y; Spiliopoulou A; Timofeeva M; Wei WQ; Gifford A; Yang T; Varley T; Tzoulaki I; Joshi P; Denny JC; Mckeigue P; Campbell H; Theodoratou E
PLoS Med; 2019 Oct; 16(10):e1002937. PubMed ID: 31626644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bayesian network analysis incorporating genetic anchors complements conventional Mendelian randomization approaches for exploratory analysis of causal relationships in complex data.
Howey R; Shin SY; Relton C; Davey Smith G; Cordell HJ
PLoS Genet; 2020 Mar; 16(3):e1008198. PubMed ID: 32119656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An iterative approach to detect pleiotropy and perform Mendelian Randomization analysis using GWAS summary statistics.
Zhu X; Li X; Xu R; Wang T
Bioinformatics; 2021 Jun; 37(10):1390-1400. PubMed ID: 33226062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mendelian randomization accounting for complex correlated horizontal pleiotropy while elucidating shared genetic etiology.
Cheng Q; Zhang X; Chen LS; Liu J
Nat Commun; 2022 Oct; 13(1):6490. PubMed ID: 36310177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression.
Bowden J; Davey Smith G; Burgess S
Int J Epidemiol; 2015 Apr; 44(2):512-25. PubMed ID: 26050253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostics for Pleiotropy in Mendelian Randomization Studies: Global and Individual Tests for Direct Effects.
Dai JY; Peters U; Wang X; Kocarnik J; Chang-Claude J; Slattery ML; Chan A; Lemire M; Berndt SI; Casey G; Song M; Jenkins MA; Brenner H; Thrift AP; White E; Hsu L
Am J Epidemiol; 2018 Dec; 187(12):2672-2680. PubMed ID: 30188971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pleiotropy-robust Mendelian randomization.
van Kippersluis H; Rietveld CA
Int J Epidemiol; 2018 Aug; 47(4):1279-1288. PubMed ID: 28338774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Extending the MR-Egger method for multivariable Mendelian randomization to correct for both measured and unmeasured pleiotropy.
Rees JMB; Wood AM; Burgess S
Stat Med; 2017 Dec; 36(29):4705-4718. PubMed ID: 28960498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mendelian randomization accounting for correlated and uncorrelated pleiotropic effects using genome-wide summary statistics.
Morrison J; Knoblauch N; Marcus JH; Stephens M; He X
Nat Genet; 2020 Jul; 52(7):740-747. PubMed ID: 32451458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Causal associations between liver traits and Colorectal cancer: a Mendelian randomization study.
Ni Y; Wang W; Liu Y; Jiang Y
BMC Med Genomics; 2023 Dec; 16(1):316. PubMed ID: 38057864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Polygenic Mendelian Randomization.
Dudbridge F
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med; 2021 Feb; 11(2):. PubMed ID: 32229610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Extending Causality Tests with Genetic Instruments: An Integration of Mendelian Randomization with the Classical Twin Design.
Minică CC; Dolan CV; Boomsma DI; de Geus E; Neale MC
Behav Genet; 2018 Jul; 48(4):337-349. PubMed ID: 29882082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
