193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29771549)
1. Corrected goodness-of-fit test in covariance structure analysis.
Hayakawa K
Psychol Methods; 2019 Jun; 24(3):371-389. PubMed ID: 29771549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Type I error rates and power of several versions of scaled chi-square difference tests in investigations of measurement invariance.
Brace JC; Savalei V
Psychol Methods; 2017 Sep; 22(3):467-485. PubMed ID: 27893215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Modified Distribution-Free Goodness-of-Fit Test Statistic.
Chun SY; Browne MW; Shapiro A
Psychometrika; 2018 Mar; 83(1):48-66. PubMed ID: 28597361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Testing small variance priors using prior-posterior predictive p values.
Hoijtink H; van de Schoot R
Psychol Methods; 2018 Sep; 23(3):561-569. PubMed ID: 28368177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantifying explained variance in multilevel models: An integrative framework for defining R-squared measures.
Rights JD; Sterba SK
Psychol Methods; 2019 Jun; 24(3):309-338. PubMed ID: 29999378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fit indices for mean structures with growth curve models.
Yuan KH; Zhang Z; Deng L
Psychol Methods; 2019 Feb; 24(1):36-53. PubMed ID: 30372100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The sum of standardized residuals: Goodness-of-fit test for binary response models.
Chen L; Sui Y; Song C; Rempala GA
Stat Med; 2018 May; 37(11):1932-1941. PubMed ID: 29579778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reconsidering the Conditions for Conducting Confirmatory Factor Analysis.
Ondé D; Alvarado JM
Span J Psychol; 2020 Dec; 23():e55. PubMed ID: 33272349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A multiple imputation score test for model modification in structural equation models.
Mansolf M; Jorgensen TD; Enders CK
Psychol Methods; 2020 Aug; 25(4):393-411. PubMed ID: 31621350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A structural equation modeling approach for modeling variability as a latent variable.
Feng Y; Hancock GR
Psychol Methods; 2024 Apr; 29(2):262-286. PubMed ID: 35404625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluating fit indices in a multilevel latent growth curve model: A Monte Carlo study.
Hsu HY; Lin JJH; Skidmore ST; Kim M
Behav Res Methods; 2019 Feb; 51(1):172-194. PubMed ID: 30536150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Autoregressive mediation models using composite scores and latent variables: Comparisons and recommendations.
Zhang Q; Yang Y
Psychol Methods; 2020 Aug; 25(4):472-495. PubMed ID: 32271042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A unified framework of longitudinal models to examine reciprocal relations.
Usami S; Murayama K; Hamaker EL
Psychol Methods; 2019 Oct; 24(5):637-657. PubMed ID: 30998041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Uncovering general, shared, and unique temporal patterns in ambulatory assessment data.
Lane ST; Gates KM; Pike HK; Beltz AM; Wright AGC
Psychol Methods; 2019 Feb; 24(1):54-69. PubMed ID: 30124300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. VAR(1) based models do not always outpredict AR(1) models in typical psychological applications.
Bulteel K; Mestdagh M; Tuerlinckx F; Ceulemans E
Psychol Methods; 2018 Dec; 23(4):740-756. PubMed ID: 29745683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of several approaches for controlling measurement error in small samples.
Savalei V
Psychol Methods; 2019 Jun; 24(3):352-370. PubMed ID: 29781637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Meta-analytic structural equation modeling with moderating effects on SEM parameters.
Jak S; Cheung MW
Psychol Methods; 2020 Aug; 25(4):430-455. PubMed ID: 31670537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The measurement of the mediator and its influence on statistical mediation conclusions.
Gonzalez O; MacKinnon DP
Psychol Methods; 2021 Feb; 26(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 32175754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Local fit evaluation of structural equation models using graphical criteria.
Thoemmes F; Rosseel Y; Textor J
Psychol Methods; 2018 Mar; 23(1):27-41. PubMed ID: 28726444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Distinguishing outcomes from indicators via Bayesian modeling.
Levy R
Psychol Methods; 2017 Dec; 22(4):632-648. PubMed ID: 29265847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
