These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29771693)

  • 1. Use of patient simulators to characterize the repeatability and reproducibility of automated oscillometric blood pressure monitors.
    Sarhrani EM; Gilmore TB; Lamontagne AS; Harris LB; Kellett JS; Sweeney MP; Navas TI; Vesnovsky O; Ho C; Herbertson LH
    Blood Press Monit; 2018 Oct; 23(5):225-229. PubMed ID: 29771693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical evaluation of an automated oscillometric blood pressure wrist device.
    Cuckson AC; Moran P; Seed P; Reinders A; Shennan AH
    Blood Press Monit; 2004 Feb; 9(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 15021076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of two oscillometric blood pressure monitors in subjects with atrial fibrillation.
    Lamb TS; Thakrar A; Ghosh M; Wilson MP; Wilson TW
    Clin Invest Med; 2010 Feb; 33(1):E54-62. PubMed ID: 20144271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inaccuracy of wrist-cuff oscillometric blood pressure devices: an arm position artefact?
    Mourad A; Gillies A; Carney S
    Blood Press Monit; 2005 Apr; 10(2):67-71. PubMed ID: 15812253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Oscillometric blood pressure devices and simulators: measurements of repeatability and differences between models.
    Sims AJ; Reay CA; Bousfield DR; Menes JA; Murray A
    J Med Eng Technol; 2005; 29(3):112-8. PubMed ID: 16019880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of oscillometric blood pressure measurements at the wrist with an upper-arm auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer.
    Rogers P; Burke V; Stroud P; Puddey IB
    Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 1999; 26(5-6):477-81. PubMed ID: 10386242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of aneroid and oscillometric blood pressure measurements in children.
    Eliasdottir SB; Steinthorsdottir SD; Indridason OS; Palsson R; Edvardsson VO
    J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich); 2013 Nov; 15(11):776-83. PubMed ID: 24112661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Blood pressure measurement in pediatric population: comparison between automated oscillometric devices and mercury sphygmomanometers-a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Araujo-Moura K; Souza LG; Mello GL; De Moraes ACF
    Eur J Pediatr; 2022 Jan; 181(1):9-22. PubMed ID: 34272985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validation of oscillometric noninvasive blood pressure measurement devices using simulators.
    Amoore JN; Lemesre Y; Murray IC; Vacher E; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Aug; 12(4):251-3. PubMed ID: 17760217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of an oscillometric device for monitoring blood pressure in dialysis patients.
    Lodi CA; Estridge C; Ghidini C
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2007 Oct; 22(10):2950-61. PubMed ID: 17556423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating the performance of automated sphygmomanometers using a patient simulator.
    Rodrigues Filho BA; Farias RF; Anjos WED; Monteiro EC
    Blood Press Monit; 2019 Dec; 24(6):299-305. PubMed ID: 31425156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy and 'range of uncertainty' of oscillometric blood pressure monitors around the upper arm and the wrist.
    Dieterle T; Battegay E; Bucheli B; Martina B
    Blood Press Monit; 1998; 3(6):339-46. PubMed ID: 10212375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Blood pressure monitoring with home monitors versus mercury sphygmomanometer.
    Rotch AL; Dean JO; Kendrach MG; Wright SG; Woolley TW
    Ann Pharmacother; 2001; 35(7-8):817-22. PubMed ID: 11485126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Baseline check of blood pressure readings of an automated device in severe pre-eclampsia and healthy normotensive pregnancy.
    Ngene NC; Moodley J
    Pregnancy Hypertens; 2018 Apr; 12():47-52. PubMed ID: 29674198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Arterial blood pressure measurement with oscillometric instruments in newborns and infants].
    Papadopoulos G; Oldörp B; Mieke S
    Anaesthesist; 1994 Jul; 43(7):441-6. PubMed ID: 8092453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparisons of Oscillometric Blood Pressure Measurements at Different Sites of the Upper Limb.
    Liu J; Ou Y; Yan BP; Sodini C; Zhao N
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2018 Jul; 2018():1168-1171. PubMed ID: 30440599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Oscillometric blood pressure measurement used for calibration of the arterial tonometry method contributes significantly to error.
    Hansen S; Staber M
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2006 Sep; 23(9):781-7. PubMed ID: 16723049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Automated determination of the ankle-brachial index using an oscillometric blood pressure monitor: validation vs. Doppler measurement and cardiovascular risk factor profile.
    Kollias A; Xilomenos A; Protogerou A; Dimakakos E; Stergiou GS
    Hypertens Res; 2011 Jul; 34(7):825-30. PubMed ID: 21593742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An evaluation of three oscillometric non-invasive blood pressure simulators.
    Amoore JN; Geake WB
    J Clin Eng; 1997; 22(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 10166510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Unreliable oscillometric blood pressure measurement: prevalence, repeatability and characteristics of the phenomenon.
    Stergiou GS; Lourida P; Tzamouranis D; Baibas NM
    J Hum Hypertens; 2009 Dec; 23(12):794-800. PubMed ID: 19322203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.