213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29771723)
1. Comparing Short-term and Oncologic Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy Across Low and High Volume Centers.
Torphy RJ; Friedman C; Halpern A; Chapman BC; Ahrendt SS; McCarter MM; Edil BH; Schulick RD; Gleisner A
Ann Surg; 2019 Dec; 270(6):1147-1155. PubMed ID: 29771723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparing oncologic and surgical outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy in patients with pancreatic cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.
Wehrle CJ; Chang JH; Gross AR; Woo K; Naples R; Stackhouse KA; Dahdaleh F; Augustin T; Joyce D; Simon R; Walsh RM; Naffouje SA
Surg Endosc; 2024 May; 38(5):2602-2610. PubMed ID: 38498210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic and peri-ampullary neoplasm (DIPLOMA-2): study protocol for an international multicenter patient-blinded randomized controlled trial.
de Graaf N; Emmen AMLH; Ramera M; Björnsson B; Boggi U; Bruna CL; Busch OR; Daams F; Ferrari G; Festen S; van Hilst J; D'Hondt M; Ielpo B; Keck T; Khatkov IE; Koerkamp BG; Lips DJ; Luyer MDP; Mieog JSD; Morelli L; Molenaar IQ; van Santvoort HC; Sprangers MAG; Ferrari C; Berkhof J; Maisonneuve P; Abu Hilal M; Besselink MG;
Trials; 2023 Oct; 24(1):665. PubMed ID: 37828593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Implementation and outcome of minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy in Europe: a registry-based retrospective study - a critical appraisal of the first 3 years of the E-MIPS registry.
Emmen AMLH; de Graaf N; Khatkov IE; Busch OR; Dokmak S; Boggi U; Groot Koerkamp B; Ferrari G; Molenaar IQ; Saint-Marc O; Ramera M; Lips DJ; Mieog JSD; Luyer MDP; Keck T; D'Hondt M; Souche FR; Edwin B; Hackert T; Liem MSL; Iben-Khayat A; van Santvoort HC; Mazzola M; de Wilde RF; Kauffmann EF; Aussilhou B; Festen S; Izrailov R; Tyutyunnik P; Besselink MG; Abu Hilal M;
Int J Surg; 2024 Apr; 110(4):2226-2233. PubMed ID: 38265434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The clinical implication of minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for non-pancreatic periampullary cancer: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis.
Uijterwijk BA; Kasai M; Lemmers DHL; Chinnusamy P; van Hilst J; Ielpo B; Wei K; Song KB; Kim SC; Klompmaker S; Jang JY; Herremans KM; Bencini L; Coratti A; Mazzola M; Menon KV; Goh BKP; Qin R; Besselink MG; Abu Hilal M;
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2023 Aug; 408(1):311. PubMed ID: 37581763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy on postoperative length of hospital stay and complications for pancreatic head or periampullary tumours: a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial.
Liu Q; Li M; Gao Y; Jiang T; Han B; Zhao G; Lin C; Lau WY; Zhao Z; Liu R
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2024 May; 9(5):428-437. PubMed ID: 38428441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Discrepancies in survival after conversion to open in minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy.
Villano AM; Ruth K; Castellanos J; Farma JM; Reddy SS
Am J Surg; 2023 Apr; 225(4):728-734. PubMed ID: 36333156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A systemic review and an updated meta-analysis: minimally invasive vs open pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Zhao Z; Yin Z; Hang Z; Ji G; Feng Q; Zhao Q
Sci Rep; 2017 May; 7(1):2220. PubMed ID: 28533536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. International survey on opinions and use of robot-assisted and laparoscopic minimally invasive pancreatic surgery: 5-year follow up.
van Ramshorst TME; van Hilst J; Bannone E; Pulvirenti A; Asbun HJ; Boggi U; Busch OR; Dokmak S; Edwin B; Hogg M; Jang JY; Keck T; Khatkov I; Kohan G; Kokudo N; Kooby DA; Nakamura M; Primrose JN; Siriwardena AK; Toso C; Vollmer CM; Zeh HJ; Besselink MG; Abu Hilal M;
HPB (Oxford); 2024 Jan; 26(1):63-72. PubMed ID: 37739876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy: A favorable approach for frail patients with pancreatic cancer.
Farah E; Al Abbas A; Abreu AA; Cheng M; Yopp A; Wang S; Mansour J; Porembka M; Zeh HJ; Polanco PM
Surgery; 2024 Apr; 175(4):1168-1175. PubMed ID: 38307784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Total laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: which one is better?
Choi M; Rho SY; Kim SH; Hwang HK; Lee WJ; Kang CM
Surg Endosc; 2022 Dec; 36(12):8959-8966. PubMed ID: 35697852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Short‑ and long‑term outcomes after laparoscopic and open pancreatoduodenectomy for elderly patients: a propensity score‑matched study.
Xu S; Deng X; Wang S; Yu G; Liu J; Gong W
BMC Geriatr; 2024 May; 24(1):462. PubMed ID: 38802742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Landmark Series: Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Resection.
van Hilst J; de Graaf N; Abu Hilal M; Besselink MG
Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Mar; 28(3):1447-1456. PubMed ID: 33341916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robotic versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy for Pancreatic and Periampullary Tumors (PORTAL): a study protocol for a multicenter phase III non-inferiority randomized controlled trial.
Jin J; Shi Y; Chen M; Qian J; Qin K; Wang Z; Chen W; Jin W; Lu F; Li Z; Wu Z; Jian L; Han B; Liang X; Sun C; Wu Z; Mou Y; Yin X; Huang H; Chen H; Gemenetzis G; Deng X; Peng C; Shen B
Trials; 2021 Dec; 22(1):954. PubMed ID: 34961558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy: a pan-European multicenter propensity-matched study.
Emmen AMLH; Zwart MJW; Khatkov IE; Boggi U; Groot Koerkamp B; Busch OR; Saint-Marc O; Dokmak S; Molenaar IQ; D'Hondt M; Ramera M; Keck T; Ferrari G; Luyer MDP; Moraldi L; Ielpo B; Wittel U; Souche FR; Hackert T; Lips D; Can MF; Bosscha K; Fara R; Festen S; van Dieren S; Coratti A; De Hingh I; Mazzola M; Wellner U; De Meyere C; van Santvoort HC; Aussilhou B; Ibenkhayat A; de Wilde RF; Kauffmann EF; Tyutyunnik P; Besselink MG; Abu Hilal M;
Surgery; 2024 Jun; 175(6):1587-1594. PubMed ID: 38570225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Epidemiology of healthcare-associated infections and outcomes among open and robotic pancreatoduodenectomy: A retrospective study from 2013 to 2022.
Yu ZH; Du MM; Lin L; Liu BW; Bai YL; Liu ML; Li JX; Lu QB; Liu YX; Yao HW
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2023 Dec; 38(12):2238-2246. PubMed ID: 37926431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis.
Zhou W; Jin W; Wang D; Lu C; Xu X; Zhang R; Kuang T; Zhou Y; Wu W; Jin D; Mou Y; Lou W
Cancer Commun (Lond); 2019 Oct; 39(1):66. PubMed ID: 31661036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Nationwide analysis of unplanned conversion during minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Stiles ZE; Tolley EA; Dickson PV; Deneve JL; Kocak M; Behrman SW
HPB (Oxford); 2023 Dec; 25(12):1566-1572. PubMed ID: 37652810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater in a medium-volume center: a propensity score matching analysis.
Liu C; Liu Y; Dong J; Chai Y; Tang H
J Int Med Res; 2023 Dec; 51(12):3000605231219061. PubMed ID: 38150553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. What are the true benefits of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy for patients with pancreatic cancer?
Stefanova I; Vescio F; Nickel F; Merali N; Ammendola M; Lahiri RP; Pencavel TD; Worthington TR; Frampton AE
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2024; 18(4-5):133-139. PubMed ID: 38712525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
