290 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29772874)
21. Electromagnetic field induced biological effects in humans.
Kaszuba-Zwoińska J; Gremba J; Gałdzińska-Calik B; Wójcik-Piotrowicz K; Thor PJ
Przegl Lek; 2015; 72(11):636-41. PubMed ID: 27012122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Radio frequency electromagnetic field compliance assessment of multi-band and MIMO equipped radio base stations.
Thors B; Thielens A; Fridén J; Colombi D; Törnevik C; Vermeeren G; Martens L; Joseph W
Bioelectromagnetics; 2014 May; 35(4):296-308. PubMed ID: 24523232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Drosophila oogenesis as a bio-marker responding to EMF sources.
Margaritis LH; Manta AK; Kokkaliaris KD; Schiza D; Alimisis K; Barkas G; Georgiou E; Giannakopoulou O; Kollia I; Kontogianni G; Kourouzidou A; Myari A; Roumelioti F; Skouroliakou A; Sykioti V; Varda G; Xenos K; Ziomas K
Electromagn Biol Med; 2014 Sep; 33(3):165-89. PubMed ID: 23915130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Assessment of the safety of toys with special reference to electromagnetic safety in view of binding regulations: a pilot study].
Mamrot P; Zmyślony M; Politański P; Aniołczyk H
Med Pr; 2005; 56(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 15998001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Radio frequency electromagnetic fields: mild hyperthermia and safety standards.
D'Andrea JA; Ziriax JM; Adair ER
Prog Brain Res; 2007; 162():107-35. PubMed ID: 17645917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. IEEE Committee on Man and Radiation-COMAR Technical Information Statement: Health and Safety Issues Concerning Exposure of the General Public to Electromagnetic Energy from 5G Wireless Communications Networks.
Bushberg JT; Chou CK; Foster KR; Kavet R; Maxson DP; Tell RA; Ziskin MC
Health Phys; 2020 Aug; 119(2):236-246. PubMed ID: 32576739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. ASSESSING THE COMPLIANCE OF ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS RADIATED BY BASE STATIONS AND WIFI ACCESS POINTS WITH INTERNATIONAL GUIDELINES ON UNIVERSITY CAMPUS.
Keshmiri S; Gholampour N; Mohtashami V
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2020 Dec; 192(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 33230555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Spatial variability of outdoor exposure to radiofrequency radiation from mobile phone base stations, in Khartoum, Sudan.
Mohammed MOA; Elzaki AA; Babiker BA; Eid OI
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Feb; 29(10):15026-15039. PubMed ID: 34622411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields on flora and fauna, Part 3. Exposure standards, public policy, laws, and future directions.
Levitt BB; Lai HC; Manville AM
Rev Environ Health; 2022 Dec; 37(4):531-558. PubMed ID: 34563106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Study of the correlation between outdoor and indoor electromagnetic exposure near cellular base stations in Leuven, Belgium.
Iyare RN; Volskiy V; Vandenbosch GAE
Environ Res; 2019 Jan; 168():428-438. PubMed ID: 30390565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Protection of the population health from electromagnetic hazards - challenges resulting from the implementation of the 5G network planned in Poland].
Zmyślony M; Bieńkowski P; Bortkiewicz A; Karpowicz J; Kieliszek J; Politański P; Rydzyński K
Med Pr; 2020 Jan; 71(1):105-113. PubMed ID: 31793559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Mobile communication and health of population: estimation of danger, social and ethical problems].
Grigor'ev IuG; Grigor'ev OA
Radiats Biol Radioecol; 2011; 51(3):357-68. PubMed ID: 21866836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Electromagnetic field pattern in the environment of GSM base stations.
Aniołczyk H
Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 1999; 12(1):47-58. PubMed ID: 10360084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Impact of input data uncertainty on environmental exposure assessment models: A case study for electromagnetic field modelling from mobile phone base stations.
Beekhuizen J; Heuvelink GB; Huss A; Bürgi A; Kromhout H; Vermeulen R
Environ Res; 2014 Nov; 135():148-55. PubMed ID: 25262088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure and non-specific symptoms of ill health: a systematic review.
Röösli M
Environ Res; 2008 Jun; 107(2):277-87. PubMed ID: 18359015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Public safety assessment of electromagnetic radiation exposure from mobile base stations.
Alhekail ZO; Hadi MA; Alkanhal MA
J Radiol Prot; 2012 Sep; 32(3):325-37. PubMed ID: 22854221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Modelling indoor electromagnetic fields (EMF) from mobile phone base stations for epidemiological studies.
Beekhuizen J; Vermeulen R; van Eijsden M; van Strien R; Bürgi A; Loomans E; Guxens M; Kromhout H; Huss A
Environ Int; 2014 Jun; 67():22-6. PubMed ID: 24632329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Cellular radio systems. Problems faced in assessing exposure to electromagnetic fields].
Zmyślony M
Med Pr; 2000; 51(2):151-8. PubMed ID: 10971929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Validity of at home model predictions as a proxy for personal exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields from mobile phone base stations.
Martens AL; Bolte JF; Beekhuizen J; Kromhout H; Smid T; Vermeulen RC
Environ Res; 2015 Oct; 142():221-6. PubMed ID: 26176419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Assessment of physiotherapists' occupational exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields from shortwave and microwave diathermy devices: a literature review.
Shah SG; Farrow A
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2013; 10(6):312-27. PubMed ID: 23570423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
