BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29774250)

  • 1. Unravelling orders in a borderless Europe? Cross-border reproductive care and the paradoxes of assisted reproductive technology policy in Germany and Poland.
    Wilson TL
    Reprod Biomed Soc Online; 2016 Dec; 3():48-59. PubMed ID: 29774250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Attitudes toward Regulations of Reproductive Care in the European Union: A Comparison between Travellers for Cross-Border Reproductive Care and Citizens of the Local Country.
    Hertz R; Nelson MK; Suñol J
    Facts Views Vis Obgyn; 2016 Sep; 8(3):147-160. PubMed ID: 28003869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Eastern Europe: pronatalist policies and private behavior.
    David HP
    Popul Bull; 1982 Feb; 36(6):1-49. PubMed ID: 12338315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cross-border reproductive care among French patients: experiences in Greece, Spain and Belgium.
    Rozée Gomez V; de La Rochebrochard E
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Nov; 28(11):3103-10. PubMed ID: 23943796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Banning reproductive travel: Turkey's ART legislation and third-party assisted reproduction.
    Gürtin ZB
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2011 Nov; 23(5):555-64. PubMed ID: 21962527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cross-border reproductive healthcare attitudes and behaviours among women living in Florence, Italy.
    Meier S; Ramos-Ortiz J; Basille K; D'Eramo AC; Diaconu AM; Flores LJ; Hottle S; Mason-Yeary K; Ruiz Y; DeMaria AL
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2022 Feb; 22(1):238. PubMed ID: 35189893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Extraterritoriality for cross-border reproductive care: should states act against citizens travelling abroad for illegal infertility treatment?
    Van Hoof W; Pennings G
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2011 Nov; 23(5):546-54. PubMed ID: 21955486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cross-border reproductive care in the USA: Who comes, why do they come, what do they purchase?
    Jacobson H
    Reprod Biomed Soc Online; 2020 Nov; 11():42-47. PubMed ID: 33204864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Legal perspectives on cross-border reproductive care.
    Crockin SL
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2011 Dec; 23(7):811-3. PubMed ID: 22056635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Abandoned by the State, betrayed by the Church: Italian experiences of cross-border reproductive care.
    Zanini G
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2011 Nov; 23(5):565-72. PubMed ID: 21955488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Patient and clinician experiences with cross-border reproductive care: A systematic review.
    McLean L; Ros ST; Hollond C; Stofan J; Quinn GP
    Patient Educ Couns; 2022 Jul; 105(7):1943-1952. PubMed ID: 35339328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The pluralism problem in cross-border reproductive care.
    Storrow RF
    Hum Reprod; 2010 Dec; 25(12):2939-43. PubMed ID: 20940141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Current issues in medically assisted reproduction and genetics in Europe: research, clinical practice, ethics, legal issues and policy.
    Harper J; Geraedts J; Borry P; Cornel MC; Dondorp WJ; Gianaroli L; Harton G; Milachich T; Kääriäinen H; Liebaers I; Morris M; Sequeiros J; Sermon K; Shenfield F; Skirton H; Soini S; Spits C; Veiga A; Vermeesch JR; Viville S; de Wert G; Macek M;
    Hum Reprod; 2014 Aug; 29(8):1603-9. PubMed ID: 25006203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Enduring politics: the culture of obstacles in legislating for assisted reproduction technologies in Ireland.
    Allison J
    Reprod Biomed Soc Online; 2016 Dec; 3():134-141. PubMed ID: 29774259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies world report: assisted reproductive technology, 2014†.
    Chambers GM; Dyer S; Zegers-Hochschild F; de Mouzon J; Ishihara O; Banker M; Mansour R; Kupka MS; Adamson GD
    Hum Reprod; 2021 Oct; 36(11):2921-2934. PubMed ID: 34601605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Egg Production and Donation: A New Frontier in the Global Landscape of Cross-Border Reproductive Care: Ethical Concerns.
    Neri M; Turillazzi E; Pascale N; Riezzo I; Pomara C
    Curr Pharm Biotechnol; 2016; 17(4):316-20. PubMed ID: 26775650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Responsive regulation of cross-border assisted reproduction.
    Millbank J
    J Law Med; 2015 Dec; 23(2):346-64. PubMed ID: 26939503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Morals or markets? Regulating assisted reproductive technologies as morality or economic policies in the states.
    Heidt-Forsythe E
    AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2017; 8(1):58-67. PubMed ID: 28949871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Implementing a good practice guide for CBRC: perspectives from the ESHRE Cross-Border Reproductive Care Taskforce.
    Shenfield F
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2011 Nov; 23(5):657-64. PubMed ID: 21955487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The global landscape of cross-border reproductive care: twenty key findings for the new millennium.
    Inhorn MC; Patrizio P
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Jun; 24(3):158-63. PubMed ID: 22366965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.