172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29774820)
1. Robotic Sacral Colpopexy.
Powell CR; Tachibana I; Eckrich B; Rothenberg J; Hathaway J
J Endourol; 2018 May; 32(S1):S111-S116. PubMed ID: 29774820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Securing Mesh with Delayed Absorbable Suture Does Not Increase Risk of Prolapse Recurrence After Robotic Sacral Colpopexy.
Powell CR; Tachibana I; Eckrich B; Rothenberg J; Hathaway J
J Endourol; 2021 Jun; 35(6):944-949. PubMed ID: 32037875
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Vaginal Sacral Colpopexy: A Natural Orifice Approach to a Gold Standard Procedure.
Hanes CR
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 28642090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Mid-term efficacy of laparoscopic sacral colpopexy of combined transabdominal-transvaginal approach in the treatment of stage Ⅳ pelvic organ prolapse].
Liang XZ; Xu LZ; Chen LQ; Wang S; Lin XT; Zhang XW
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Mar; 54(3):160-165. PubMed ID: 30893716
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The 26-Minute Laparoscopic Sacral Colpopexy: Do We Really Need Robotic Technology?
Miklos JR; Moore RD
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(5):712. PubMed ID: 25769671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Evaluation on clinical effectiveness of modified laparoscopic sacral colpopexy].
Zhang XW; Xu L; Li YX; Gan YP; Chen LQ
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Aug; 48(8):570-4. PubMed ID: 24199920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Robotic Sacral Colpopexy Using Autologous Fascia Lata Compared with Mesh.
Bock ME; Nagle R; Soyster M; Song L; Tachibana I; Hathaway JK; Powell CR
J Endourol; 2021 Jun; 35(6):801-807. PubMed ID: 33107334
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Anchor vs suture for the attachment of vaginal mesh in a robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: a randomized clinical trial.
Berger AA; Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 223(2):258.e1-258.e8. PubMed ID: 32413431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A randomized controlled trial comparing fascia lata and synthetic mesh for sacral colpopexy.
Culligan PJ; Blackwell L; Goldsmith LJ; Graham CA; Rogers A; Heit MH
Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jul; 106(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 15994614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.
Serati M; Bogani G; Sorice P; Braga A; Torella M; Salvatore S; Uccella S; Cromi A; Ghezzi F
Eur Urol; 2014 Aug; 66(2):303-18. PubMed ID: 24631406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long-Term Effectiveness of Uterosacral Colpopexy and Minimally Invasive Sacral Colpopexy for Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
Unger CA; Barber MD; Walters MD; Paraiso MFR; Ridgeway B; Jelovsek JE
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2017; 23(3):188-194. PubMed ID: 27636212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Surgical outcomes of abdominal versus laparoscopic sacral colpopexy related to body mass index.
McDermott CD; Park J; Terry CL; Woodman PJ; Hale DS
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2012 Jan; 34(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 22260763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evidence to justify retention of transvaginal mesh: comparison between laparoscopic sacral colpopexy and transvaginal Elevate™ mesh.
To V; Hengrasmee P; Lam A; Luscombe G; Lawless A; Lam J
Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Dec; 28(12):1825-1832. PubMed ID: 28620794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy and a new approach to mesh fixation: a randomized clinical trial.
Morciano A; Marzo G; Caliandro D; Campagna G; Panico G; Alcaino S; Bisanti T; Ercoli A; Romualdi D; Scambia G
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 Nov; 298(5):939-944. PubMed ID: 30255345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Magnetic resonance imaging of abdominal versus vaginal prolapse surgery with mesh.
Ginath S; Garely AD; Luchs JS; Shahryarinejad A; Olivera CK; Zhou S; Ascher-Walsh CJ; Condrea A; Brodman ML; Vardy MD
Int Urogynecol J; 2012 Nov; 23(11):1569-76. PubMed ID: 22543549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: surgical technique and outcomes at a single high-volume institution.
Ploumidis A; Spinoit AF; De Naeyer G; Schatteman P; Gan M; Ficarra V; Volpe A; Mottrie A
Eur Urol; 2014 Jan; 65(1):138-45. PubMed ID: 23806518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Laparoscopic-assisted tension-free vaginal mesh: an innovative approach to placing synthetic mesh: transvaginally for surgical correction of pelvic organ prolapse.
Watanabe T; Inoue M; Ishii A; Yamato T; Yamamoto M; Sasaki K; Kobayashi Y; Araki M; Uehara S; Saika T; Kumon H
Acta Med Okayama; 2012; 66(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 22358136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Abdominal sacral colpopexy using autologous fascia lata.
Latini JM; Brown JA; Kreder KJ
J Urol; 2004 Mar; 171(3):1176-9. PubMed ID: 14767295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Anterior-apical single-incision mesh surgery (SIMS): surgical and functional outcomes at 1 year.
Lo TS; Tan YL; Cortes EF; Pue LB; Wu PY; Al-Kharabsheh A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015 Jan; 22(1):50-6. PubMed ID: 25017520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. One-year functional and anatomic outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy versus vaginal extraperitoneal colpopexy with mesh.
Jambusaria LH; Murphy M; Lucente VR
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2015; 21(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 25185594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
