These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29774945)

  • 1. The relationship between postmating reproductive isolation and reinforcement in Phlox.
    Suni SS; Hopkins R
    Evolution; 2018 May; ():. PubMed ID: 29774945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Genomic evidence of gene flow during reinforcement in Texas Phlox.
    Roda F; Mendes FK; Hahn MW; Hopkins R
    Mol Ecol; 2017 Apr; 26(8):2317-2330. PubMed ID: 28141906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The strength of reproductive isolating barriers in seed plants: Insights from studies quantifying premating and postmating reproductive barriers over the past 15 years.
    Christie K; Fraser LS; Lowry DB
    Evolution; 2022 Oct; 76(10):2228-2243. PubMed ID: 35838076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Strong postmating reproductive isolation in Mimulus section Eunanus.
    Farnitano MC; Sweigart AL
    J Evol Biol; 2023 Oct; 36(10):1393-1410. PubMed ID: 37691442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reinforcement in plants.
    Hopkins R
    New Phytol; 2013 Mar; 197(4):1095-103. PubMed ID: 23495388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Postmating-prezygotic isolation is not an important source of selection for reinforcement within and between species in Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis.
    Lorch PD; Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2005 May; 59(5):1039-45. PubMed ID: 16136803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dissecting functional components of reproductive isolation among closely related sympatric species of the
    Pombi M; Kengne P; Gimonneau G; Tene-Fossog B; Ayala D; Kamdem C; Santolamazza F; Guelbeogo WM; Sagnon N; Petrarca V; Fontenille D; Besansky NJ; Antonio-Nkondjio C; Dabiré RK; Della Torre A; Simard F; Costantini C
    Evol Appl; 2017 Dec; 10(10):1102-1120. PubMed ID: 29151864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The cost of reinforcement: selection on flower color in allopatric populations of Phlox drummondii.
    Hopkins R; Rausher MD
    Am Nat; 2014 May; 183(5):693-710. PubMed ID: 24739201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reinforced postmating reproductive isolation barriers in Neurospora, an Ascomycete microfungus.
    Turner E; Jacobson DJ; Taylor JW
    J Evol Biol; 2010 Aug; 23(8):1642-56. PubMed ID: 20546092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intraspecific variation in reproductive barriers between two closely related Arabidopsis sister species.
    Perrier A; Willi Y
    J Evol Biol; 2023 Jan; 36(1):121-130. PubMed ID: 36436201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multiple strong postmating and intrinsic postzygotic reproductive barriers isolate florally diverse species of Jaltomata (Solanaceae).
    Kostyun JL; Moyle LC
    Evolution; 2017 Jun; 71(6):1556-1571. PubMed ID: 28432763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patterns of reproductive isolation in three angiosperm genera.
    Moyle LC; Olson MS; Tiffin P
    Evolution; 2004 Jun; 58(6):1195-208. PubMed ID: 15266970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hybridization, natural selection, and evolution of reproductive isolation: a 25-years survey of an artificial sympatric area between two mosquito sibling species of the Aedes mariae complex.
    Urbanelli S; Porretta D; Mastrantonio V; Bellini R; Pieraccini G; Romoli R; Crasta G; Nascetti G
    Evolution; 2014 Oct; 68(10):3030-8. PubMed ID: 25041755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reinforcement as an initiator of population divergence and speciation.
    Pfennig KS
    Curr Zool; 2016 Apr; 62(2):145-154. PubMed ID: 29491902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Strength of sexual and postmating prezygotic barriers varies between sympatric populations with different histories and species abundances.
    Poikela N; Kinnunen J; Wurdack M; Kauranen H; Schmitt T; Kankare M; Snook RR; Hoikkala A
    Evolution; 2019 Jun; 73(6):1182-1199. PubMed ID: 30957216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The rate test of speciation: estimating the likelihood of non-allopatric speciation from reproductive isolation rates in Drosophila.
    Yukilevich R
    Evolution; 2014 Apr; 68(4):1150-62. PubMed ID: 24274675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reinforcement's incidental effects on reproductive isolation between conspecifics.
    Comeault AA; Matute DR
    Curr Zool; 2016 Apr; 62(2):135-143. PubMed ID: 29491901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of prezygotic isolation mechanisms in the divergence of two parasite species.
    Henrich T; Kalbe M
    BMC Evol Biol; 2016 Nov; 16(1):245. PubMed ID: 27829374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sympatric reinforcement of reproductive barriers between Neotinea tridentata and N. ustulata (Orchidaceae).
    Pellegrino G
    J Plant Res; 2016 Nov; 129(6):1061-1068. PubMed ID: 27502952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Patterns of reproductive isolation in a haplodiploid mite, Amphitetranychus viennensis: prezygotic isolation, hybrid inviability and hybrid sterility.
    Sato Y; Fujiwara S; Egas M; Matsuda T; Gotoh T
    BMC Ecol Evol; 2021 Sep; 21(1):177. PubMed ID: 34551724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.