167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29775922)
1. Acid phosphatase test on Phadebas
Herman Y; Feine I; Gafny R
Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Jul; 288():218-222. PubMed ID: 29775922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The evaluation and validation of Phadebas
Wornes DJ; Speers SJ; Murakami JA
Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Jul; 288():81-88. PubMed ID: 29734053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Direct-STR typing from presumptively-tested and untreated body fluids.
Thanakiatkrai P; Raham K; Pradutkanchana J; Sotthibandhu S; Kitpipit T
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Sep; 30():1-9. PubMed ID: 28605649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The use of Polilight in the detection of seminal fluid, saliva, and bloodstains and comparison with conventional chemical-based screening tests.
Vandenberg N; van Oorschot RA
J Forensic Sci; 2006 Mar; 51(2):361-70. PubMed ID: 16566772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Amylase levels in semen and saliva stains.
Auvdel MJ
J Forensic Sci; 1986 Apr; 31(2):426-31. PubMed ID: 2423634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Applicability of two commercially available kits for forensic identification of saliva stains.
Pang BC; Cheung BK
J Forensic Sci; 2008 Sep; 53(5):1117-22. PubMed ID: 18637870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Repeatedly washed semen stains: Optimal screening and sampling strategies for DNA analysis.
Noël S; Lagacé K; Raymond S; Granger D; Loyer M; Bourgoin S; Jolicoeur C; Séguin D
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Jan; 38():9-14. PubMed ID: 30312967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improved detection of semen by use of direct acid phosphatase testing.
Lewis J; Baird A; McAlister C; Siemieniuk A; Blackmore L; McCabe B; O'Rourke P; Parekh R; Watson E; Wheelhouse M; Wilson N
Sci Justice; 2013 Dec; 53(4):385-94. PubMed ID: 24188339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of modern techniques for saliva screening.
Myers JR; Adkins WK
J Forensic Sci; 2008 Jul; 53(4):862-7. PubMed ID: 18503523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comprehensive study into false positive rates for 'other' biological samples using common presumptive testing methods.
Stroud A; Gamblin A; Birchall P; Harbison S; Opperman S
Sci Justice; 2023 May; 63(3):414-420. PubMed ID: 37169467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Applicability of ELISA detection of statherin for forensic identification of saliva.
Akutsu T; Watanabe K; Fujinami Y; Sakurada K
Int J Legal Med; 2010 Sep; 124(5):493-8. PubMed ID: 19953261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of amylase testing as a tool for saliva screening of crime scene trace swabs.
Hedman J; Dalin E; Rasmusson B; Ansell R
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Jun; 5(3):194-8. PubMed ID: 20457099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The acid phosphatase test two minute cut-off: an insufficient time to detect some semen stains.
Redhead P; Brown MK
Sci Justice; 2013 Jun; 53(2):187-91. PubMed ID: 23601727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sensitivity and specificity of presumptive tests for blood, saliva and semen.
Vennemann M; Scott G; Curran L; Bittner F; Tobe SS
Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2014 Mar; 10(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 24443142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of mark enhancement techniques on the subsequent detection of saliva.
McAllister P; Graham E; Deacon P; Farrugia KJ
Sci Justice; 2016 Sep; 56(5):305-320. PubMed ID: 27702446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessing the background levels of body fluids on hands.
Douglas H; Fraser I; Davidson G; Murphy C; Gorman ML; Boyce M; Doole S
Sci Justice; 2023 Jul; 63(4):493-499. PubMed ID: 37453781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detecting and collecting traces of semen and blood from outdoor crime scenes using crime scene dogs and presumptive tests.
Skalleberg AG; Bouzga MM
Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Jul; 264():146-52. PubMed ID: 27174517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Copan microFLOQ® Direct Swab collection of bloodstains, saliva, and semen on cotton cloth.
Sherier AJ; Kieser RE; Novroski NMM; Wendt FR; King JL; Woerner AE; Ambers A; Garofano P; Budowle B
Int J Legal Med; 2020 Jan; 134(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 31165261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The use of forensic tests to distinguish blowfly artifacts from human blood, semen, and saliva.
Durdle A; Mitchell RJ; van Oorschot RA
J Forensic Sci; 2015 Mar; 60(2):468-70. PubMed ID: 25407611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the effect of ozone disinfection on forensic identification of blood, saliva, and semen stains.
Fejes V; Simon G; Makszin L; Sipos K; Poor VS
Sci Justice; 2024 Mar; 64(2):151-158. PubMed ID: 38431372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
