These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29775922)

  • 21. Oral intercourse or secondary transfer? A Bayesian approach of salivary amylase and foreign DNA findings.
    Breathnach M; Moore E
    Forensic Sci Int; 2013 Jun; 229(1-3):52-9. PubMed ID: 23683908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of Four Saliva Detection Methods to Identify Expectorated Blood Spatter.
    Park HY; Son BN; Seo YI; Lim SK
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Nov; 60(6):1571-6. PubMed ID: 26212779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Acid phosphatase screening - wetting test paper or wetting fabric and test paper?
    Davidson G; Jalowiecki TB
    Sci Justice; 2012 Jun; 52(2):106-11. PubMed ID: 22583503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Presumptive screening test for seminal acid phosphatase using sodium thymolphthalein monophosphate.
    Seiden H; Duncan GT
    J Assoc Off Anal Chem; 1983 Jan; 66(1):207-9. PubMed ID: 6826509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The sensitivity and specificity of the RSID-saliva kit for the detection of human salivary amylase in the Forensic Science Laboratory, Dublin, Ireland.
    Casey DG; Price J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2010 Jan; 194(1-3):67-71. PubMed ID: 19931992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparative performance of the Phadebas® Forensic Press Test at room temperature and 37 °C for the detection of saliva stains on fabric exhibits.
    Woodford H; Mitchell N; Henry J
    Sci Justice; 2021 Mar; 61(2):170-174. PubMed ID: 33736849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The fallacy of the two-minute acid phosphatase cut off.
    Lewis J; Jones S; Baxter F; Siemieniuk A; Talbot R
    Sci Justice; 2012 Jun; 52(2):76-80. PubMed ID: 22583498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of Catalytic and Immunological Amylase Tests for Identifying of Saliva from Degraded Samples.
    Ohta J; Noda N; Sakurada K
    J Forensic Sci; 2019 May; 64(3):873-877. PubMed ID: 30339736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The use of acid phosphatase test papers for DNA profiling.
    Reshef A; Barash M; Gallili N; Michael A; Brauner P
    Sci Justice; 2005; 45(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 16080323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The use of crime scene detection dogs to locate semen stains on different types of fabric.
    van Dam A; Schoon A; Wierda SF; Heeringa E; Aalders CG
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Sep; 302():109907. PubMed ID: 31401415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Typing of gonadospecific diaphorase (DIA3) in seminal stains and esterase D typing in seminal and saliva stains (author's transl)].
    Oepen I; Peters B; Salzmann N; Wehr G
    Z Rechtsmed; 1980; 85(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 7405407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The sensitivity and specificity of red-starch paper for the detection of saliva.
    Martin NC; Clayson NJ; Scrimger DG
    Sci Justice; 2006; 46(2):97-105. PubMed ID: 17002212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A comparison of ABAcard(®) p30 and RSID™-Semen test kits for forensic semen identification.
    Boward ES; Wilson SL
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2013 Nov; 20(8):1126-30. PubMed ID: 24237835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The simultaneous identification of seminal acid phosphatase and phosphoglucomutase by starch gel electrophoresis.
    Linde HG; Molnar KE
    J Forensic Sci; 1980 Jan; 25(1):113-7. PubMed ID: 6446593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Enzyme activity, DNA degradation and drying times of semen, saliva and vaginal material.
    Finnis J; Murphy C; Davidson G; Alexander K; Lewis J; Boyce M; Kennedy F; Casey D; Clayson N; Fraser I; Hargreaves C; Stevenson N; Doole S; Rogers C
    Sci Justice; 2023 Nov; 63(6):663-670. PubMed ID: 38030337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Applicability of the ParaDNA(®) Screening System to Seminal Samples.
    Tribble ND; Miller JA; Dawnay N; Duxbury NJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 May; 60(3):690-2. PubMed ID: 25739746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An ELISA method for the identification of salivary amylase.
    Quarino L; Dang Q; Hartmann J; Moynihan N
    J Forensic Sci; 2005 Jul; 50(4):873-6. PubMed ID: 16078490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Detection and identification of body fluid stains using antibody-nanoparticle conjugates.
    Frascione N; Thorogate R; Daniel B; Jickells S
    Analyst; 2012 Jan; 137(2):508-12. PubMed ID: 22117199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Estimating the efficiency of DNA isolation methods in semen, blood and saliva stains using the QuantiBlot system].
    Prośniak A; Gloc E; Berent J; Babol-Pokora K; Jacewicz R; Szram S
    Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2006; 56(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 16708611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Alpha-amylase kinetic test in bodily single and mixed stains.
    Barni F; Berti A; Rapone C; Lago G
    J Forensic Sci; 2006 Nov; 51(6):1389-96. PubMed ID: 17199626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.