142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29776475)
1. A Systematic Review of the Psychometric Properties of the Modified Behavioral Pain Scale (MBPS).
Crellin DJ; Babl FE; Santamaria N; Harrison D
J Pediatr Nurs; 2018; 40():14-26. PubMed ID: 29776475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Psychometric Properties of the MBPS Scale Used to Assess Procedural Pain.
Crellin DJ; Babl FE; Santamaria N; Harrison D
J Pain; 2018 Jun; 19(6):660-669. PubMed ID: 29454046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Systematic review of the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry and Consolability scale for assessing pain in infants and children: is it reliable, valid, and feasible for use?
Crellin DJ; Harrison D; Santamaria N; Babl FE
Pain; 2015 Nov; 156(11):2132-2151. PubMed ID: 26207651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Procedural Pain Scale Evaluation (PROPoSE) study: protocol for an evaluation of the psychometric properties of behavioural pain scales for the assessment of procedural pain in infants and children aged 6-42 months.
Crellin DJ; Harrison D; Hutchinson A; Schuster T; Santamaria N; Babl FE
BMJ Open; 2017 Sep; 7(9):e016225. PubMed ID: 28882914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the Psychometric Properties of the FLACC Scale, the MBPS and the Observer Applied Visual Analogue Scale Used to Assess Procedural Pain.
Crellin D; Harrison D; Santamaria N; Babl FE
J Pain Res; 2021; 14():881-892. PubMed ID: 33833566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Infant Clinical Pain Assessment: Core Behavioral Cues.
DiLorenzo MG; Pillai Riddell R; Flora DB; Craig KD
J Pain; 2018 Sep; 19(9):1024-1032. PubMed ID: 29655842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Psychometric Properties of the FLACC Scale Used to Assess Procedural Pain.
Crellin DJ; Harrison D; Santamaria N; Huque H; Babl FE
J Pain; 2018 Aug; 19(8):862-872. PubMed ID: 29551662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Psychometric Properties of the Visual Analogue Scale Applied by an Observer to Assess Procedural Pain in Infants and Young Children: An Observational Study.
Crellin DJ; Harrison D; Santamaria N; Huque H; Babl FE
J Pediatr Nurs; 2021; 59():89-95. PubMed ID: 33561663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Where Are We: A Systematic Evaluation of the Psychometric Properties of Pain Assessment Scales for Use in Chinese Children.
Bai J; Jiang N
Pain Manag Nurs; 2015 Aug; 16(4):617-31. PubMed ID: 26256224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pain assessment tools for use in infants: a meta-review.
Arabiat D; Mörelius E; Hoti K; Hughes J
BMC Pediatr; 2023 Jun; 23(1):307. PubMed ID: 37337167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effectiveness and tolerability of pharmacologic and combined interventions for reducing injection pain during routine childhood immunizations: systematic review and meta-analyses.
Shah V; Taddio A; Rieder MJ;
Clin Ther; 2009; 31 Suppl 2():S104-51. PubMed ID: 19781433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Psychometric properties of the non-communicating children's pain checklist-revised.
Breau LM; McGrath PJ; Camfield CS; Finley GA
Pain; 2002 Sep; 99(1-2):349-57. PubMed ID: 12237214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Psychometric Properties of the Numerical Rating Scale to Assess Self-Reported Pain Intensity in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review.
Castarlenas E; Jensen MP; von Baeyer CL; Miró J
Clin J Pain; 2017 Apr; 33(4):376-383. PubMed ID: 27518484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Psychometric analysis of a Taiwan-version pain assessment scale for preterm infants.
Liaw JJ; Yang L; Chou HL; Yin T; Chao SC; Lee TY
J Clin Nurs; 2012 Jan; 21(1-2):89-100. PubMed ID: 21762417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Recommendations for selection of self-report pain intensity measures in children and adolescents: a systematic review and quality assessment of measurement properties.
Birnie KA; Hundert AS; Lalloo C; Nguyen C; Stinson JN
Pain; 2019 Jan; 160(1):5-18. PubMed ID: 30180088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pain Assessment in Newborns, Infants, and Children.
Beltramini A; Milojevic K; Pateron D
Pediatr Ann; 2017 Oct; 46(10):e387-e395. PubMed ID: 29019634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of two behavioural pain scales for the assessment of procedural pain: A systematic review.
Birkedal HC; Larsen MH; Steindal SA; Solberg MT
Nurs Open; 2021 Sep; 8(5):2050-2060. PubMed ID: 34388865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A systematic review of tools designed for teacher proxy-report of children's physical literacy or constituting elements.
Essiet IA; Lander NJ; Salmon J; Duncan MJ; Eyre ELJ; Ma J; Barnett LM
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2021 Oct; 18(1):131. PubMed ID: 34620185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reliability, validity and clinical utility of three types of pain behavioural observation scales for young children with burns aged 0-5 years.
de Jong A; Baartmans M; Bremer M; van Komen R; Middelkoop E; Tuinebreijer W; van Loey N
Pain; 2010 Sep; 150(3):561-567. PubMed ID: 20619968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reliability and validity of the Faces and Word Descriptor Scales to measure procedural pain.
Keck JF; Gerkensmeyer JE; Joyce BA; Schade JG
J Pediatr Nurs; 1996 Dec; 11(6):368-74. PubMed ID: 8991337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
