BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29776598)

  • 1. Less versus more radical surgery in stage IB1 cervical cancer: A population-based study of long-term survival.
    Tseng JH; Aloisi A; Sonoda Y; Gardner GJ; Zivanovic O; Abu-Rustum NR; Leitao MM
    Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Jul; 150(1):44-49. PubMed ID: 29776598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Long-Term Oncologic Outcomes of Uterine-Preserving Surgery in Young Women With Stage Ib1 Cervical Cancer.
    Tseng JH; Aloisi A; Sonoda Y; Gardner GJ; Zivanovic O; Abu-Rustum NR; Leitao MM
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2018 Sep; 28(7):1350-1359. PubMed ID: 30036225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Preoperative Conization and Risk of Recurrence in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer: A Multicenter Study.
    Casarin J; Bogani G; Papadia A; Ditto A; Pinelli C; Garzon S; Donadello N; Laganà AS; Cromi A; Mueller M; Raspagliesi F; Ghezzi F
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Jan; 28(1):117-123. PubMed ID: 32320800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. International radical trachelectomy assessment: IRTA study.
    Salvo G; Ramirez PT; Leitao M; Cibula D; Fotopoulou C; Kucukmetin A; Rendon G; Perrotta M; Ribeiro R; Vieira M; Baiocchi G; Falconer H; Persson J; Wu X; Căpilna ME; Ioanid N; Mosgaard BJ; Berlev I; Kaidarova D; Olawaiye AB; Liu K; Nobre SP; Kocian R; Saso S; Rundle S; Noll F; Tsunoda AT; Palsdottir K; Li X; Ulrikh E; Hu Z; Pareja R
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Mar; 29(3):635-638. PubMed ID: 30765489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Oncologic outcome of fertility-sparing radical trachelectomy versus radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical carcinoma.
    Diaz JP; Sonoda Y; Leitao MM; Zivanovic O; Brown CL; Chi DS; Barakat RR; Abu-Rustum NR
    Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Nov; 111(2):255-60. PubMed ID: 18755500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Long-term oncological outcomes and recurrence patterns in early-stage cervical cancer treated with minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy: The Norwegian Radium Hospital experience.
    Sert BM; Kristensen GB; Kleppe A; Dørum A
    Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 162(2):284-291. PubMed ID: 34083029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Management of low-risk early-stage cervical cancer: should conization, simple trachelectomy, or simple hysterectomy replace radical surgery as the new standard of care?
    Ramirez PT; Pareja R; Rendón GJ; Millan C; Frumovitz M; Schmeler KM
    Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Jan; 132(1):254-9. PubMed ID: 24041877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative outcomes between robotic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for IB1 cervical cancer: Results from a single high volume institution.
    Doo DW; Kirkland CT; Griswold LH; McGwin G; Huh WK; Leath CA; Kim KH
    Gynecol Oncol; 2019 May; 153(2):242-247. PubMed ID: 30850169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Survival Rate and Surgical Morbidity of Abdominal Radical Trachelectomy Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Stage IB1 Cervical Cancer.
    Li X; Li J; Wen H; Ju X; Chen X; Xia L; Ke G; Tang J; Wu X
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Sep; 23(9):2953-8. PubMed ID: 27044448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fertility-sparing surgery vs standard surgery for early-stage cervical cancer: difference in 5-year life expectancy by tumor size.
    Jorgensen KA; Agusti N; Wu CF; Kanbergs A; Pareja R; Ramirez PT; Rauh-Hain JA; Melamed A
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Jun; 230(6):663.e1-663.e13. PubMed ID: 38365097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of survival outcomes between minimally invasive surgery and conventional open surgery for radical hysterectomy as primary treatment in patients with stage IB1-IIA2 cervical cancer.
    Kim SI; Cho JH; Seol A; Kim YI; Lee M; Kim HS; Chung HH; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS
    Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Apr; 153(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 30642625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical tumor diameter and prognosis of patients with FIGO stage IB1 cervical cancer (JCOG0806-A).
    Kato T; Takashima A; Kasamatsu T; Nakamura K; Mizusawa J; Nakanishi T; Takeshima N; Kamiura S; Onda T; Sumi T; Takano M; Nakai H; Saito T; Fujiwara K; Yokoyama M; Itamochi H; Takehara K; Yokota H; Mizunoe T; Takeda S; Sonoda K; Shiozawa T; Kawabata T; Honma S; Fukuda H; Yaegashi N; Yoshikawa H; Konishi I; Kamura T;
    Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Apr; 137(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 25662625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Association of preoperative conization with recurrences after laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for FIGO 2018 stage IB1 cervical cancer.
    Ding Y; Zhang X; Qiu J; Li C; Hua K
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2023 Jun; 307(6):1901-1909. PubMed ID: 36329212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy on survival outcome in patients with FIGO stage IB cervical cancer: A matching study of two institutional hospitals in Korea.
    Kim SI; Lee M; Lee S; Suh DH; Kim HS; Kim K; Chung HH; No JH; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS; Kim YB
    Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Oct; 155(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 31383569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Simple vaginal trachelectomy in women with early-stage low-risk cervical cancer who wish to preserve fertility: the new standard of care?
    Plante M; Renaud MC; Sebastianelli A; Gregoire J
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Jul; 30(7):981-986. PubMed ID: 32499393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Surgical and Oncologic Outcomes of Radical Abdominal Trachelectomy Versus Hysterectomy for Stage IA2-IB1 Cervical Cancer.
    Guo J; Zhang Y; Chen X; Sun L; Chen K; Sheng X
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(3):484-491. PubMed ID: 29908338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Characteristics and outcomes of reproductive-aged women with early-stage cervical cancer: trachelectomy vs hysterectomy.
    Machida H; Mandelbaum RS; Mikami M; Enomoto T; Sonoda Y; Grubbs BH; Paulson RJ; Roman LD; Wright JD; Matsuo K
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):461.e1-461.e18. PubMed ID: 30138618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predictors of recurrence following laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: A multi-institutional study.
    Casarin J; Buda A; Bogani G; Fanfani F; Papadia A; Ceccaroni M; Malzoni M; Pellegrino A; Ferrari F; Greggi S; Uccella S; Pinelli C; Cromi A; Ditto A; Di Martino G; Anchora LP; Falcone F; Bonfiglio F; Odicino F; Mueller M; Scambia G; Raspagliesi F; Landoni F; Ghezzi F
    Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Oct; 159(1):164-170. PubMed ID: 32665147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical cancer patients with tumor size ≤ 2 cm: a case-matched control study.
    Chen C; Liu P; Ni Y; Tang L; Xu Y; Bin X; Lang J
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2020 May; 25(5):937-947. PubMed ID: 32062731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Postoperative outcomes of MR-invisible stage IB1 cervical cancer.
    Park JY; Lee JW; Park BK; Lee YY; Choi CH; Kim TJ; Bae DS; Kim BG; Park JJ; Park SY; Kim CK
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Aug; 211(2):168.e1-7. PubMed ID: 24607752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.