These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29776598)

  • 1. Less versus more radical surgery in stage IB1 cervical cancer: A population-based study of long-term survival.
    Tseng JH; Aloisi A; Sonoda Y; Gardner GJ; Zivanovic O; Abu-Rustum NR; Leitao MM
    Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Jul; 150(1):44-49. PubMed ID: 29776598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Long-Term Oncologic Outcomes of Uterine-Preserving Surgery in Young Women With Stage Ib1 Cervical Cancer.
    Tseng JH; Aloisi A; Sonoda Y; Gardner GJ; Zivanovic O; Abu-Rustum NR; Leitao MM
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2018 Sep; 28(7):1350-1359. PubMed ID: 30036225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Preoperative Conization and Risk of Recurrence in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer: A Multicenter Study.
    Casarin J; Bogani G; Papadia A; Ditto A; Pinelli C; Garzon S; Donadello N; Laganà AS; Cromi A; Mueller M; Raspagliesi F; Ghezzi F
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Jan; 28(1):117-123. PubMed ID: 32320800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. International radical trachelectomy assessment: IRTA study.
    Salvo G; Ramirez PT; Leitao M; Cibula D; Fotopoulou C; Kucukmetin A; Rendon G; Perrotta M; Ribeiro R; Vieira M; Baiocchi G; Falconer H; Persson J; Wu X; Căpilna ME; Ioanid N; Mosgaard BJ; Berlev I; Kaidarova D; Olawaiye AB; Liu K; Nobre SP; Kocian R; Saso S; Rundle S; Noll F; Tsunoda AT; Palsdottir K; Li X; Ulrikh E; Hu Z; Pareja R
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Mar; 29(3):635-638. PubMed ID: 30765489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Oncologic outcome of fertility-sparing radical trachelectomy versus radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical carcinoma.
    Diaz JP; Sonoda Y; Leitao MM; Zivanovic O; Brown CL; Chi DS; Barakat RR; Abu-Rustum NR
    Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Nov; 111(2):255-60. PubMed ID: 18755500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Long-term oncological outcomes and recurrence patterns in early-stage cervical cancer treated with minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy: The Norwegian Radium Hospital experience.
    Sert BM; Kristensen GB; Kleppe A; Dørum A
    Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 162(2):284-291. PubMed ID: 34083029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Management of low-risk early-stage cervical cancer: should conization, simple trachelectomy, or simple hysterectomy replace radical surgery as the new standard of care?
    Ramirez PT; Pareja R; Rendón GJ; Millan C; Frumovitz M; Schmeler KM
    Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Jan; 132(1):254-9. PubMed ID: 24041877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative outcomes between robotic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for IB1 cervical cancer: Results from a single high volume institution.
    Doo DW; Kirkland CT; Griswold LH; McGwin G; Huh WK; Leath CA; Kim KH
    Gynecol Oncol; 2019 May; 153(2):242-247. PubMed ID: 30850169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Survival Rate and Surgical Morbidity of Abdominal Radical Trachelectomy Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Stage IB1 Cervical Cancer.
    Li X; Li J; Wen H; Ju X; Chen X; Xia L; Ke G; Tang J; Wu X
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Sep; 23(9):2953-8. PubMed ID: 27044448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of survival outcomes between minimally invasive surgery and conventional open surgery for radical hysterectomy as primary treatment in patients with stage IB1-IIA2 cervical cancer.
    Kim SI; Cho JH; Seol A; Kim YI; Lee M; Kim HS; Chung HH; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS
    Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Apr; 153(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 30642625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fertility-sparing surgery vs standard surgery for early-stage cervical cancer: difference in 5-year life expectancy by tumor size.
    Jorgensen KA; Agusti N; Wu CF; Kanbergs A; Pareja R; Ramirez PT; Rauh-Hain JA; Melamed A
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Jun; 230(6):663.e1-663.e13. PubMed ID: 38365097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical tumor diameter and prognosis of patients with FIGO stage IB1 cervical cancer (JCOG0806-A).
    Kato T; Takashima A; Kasamatsu T; Nakamura K; Mizusawa J; Nakanishi T; Takeshima N; Kamiura S; Onda T; Sumi T; Takano M; Nakai H; Saito T; Fujiwara K; Yokoyama M; Itamochi H; Takehara K; Yokota H; Mizunoe T; Takeda S; Sonoda K; Shiozawa T; Kawabata T; Honma S; Fukuda H; Yaegashi N; Yoshikawa H; Konishi I; Kamura T;
    Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Apr; 137(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 25662625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Association of preoperative conization with recurrences after laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for FIGO 2018 stage IB1 cervical cancer.
    Ding Y; Zhang X; Qiu J; Li C; Hua K
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2023 Jun; 307(6):1901-1909. PubMed ID: 36329212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy on survival outcome in patients with FIGO stage IB cervical cancer: A matching study of two institutional hospitals in Korea.
    Kim SI; Lee M; Lee S; Suh DH; Kim HS; Kim K; Chung HH; No JH; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS; Kim YB
    Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Oct; 155(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 31383569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Simple vaginal trachelectomy in women with early-stage low-risk cervical cancer who wish to preserve fertility: the new standard of care?
    Plante M; Renaud MC; Sebastianelli A; Gregoire J
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Jul; 30(7):981-986. PubMed ID: 32499393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Surgical and Oncologic Outcomes of Radical Abdominal Trachelectomy Versus Hysterectomy for Stage IA2-IB1 Cervical Cancer.
    Guo J; Zhang Y; Chen X; Sun L; Chen K; Sheng X
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(3):484-491. PubMed ID: 29908338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Characteristics and outcomes of reproductive-aged women with early-stage cervical cancer: trachelectomy vs hysterectomy.
    Machida H; Mandelbaum RS; Mikami M; Enomoto T; Sonoda Y; Grubbs BH; Paulson RJ; Roman LD; Wright JD; Matsuo K
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):461.e1-461.e18. PubMed ID: 30138618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predictors of recurrence following laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: A multi-institutional study.
    Casarin J; Buda A; Bogani G; Fanfani F; Papadia A; Ceccaroni M; Malzoni M; Pellegrino A; Ferrari F; Greggi S; Uccella S; Pinelli C; Cromi A; Ditto A; Di Martino G; Anchora LP; Falcone F; Bonfiglio F; Odicino F; Mueller M; Scambia G; Raspagliesi F; Landoni F; Ghezzi F
    Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Oct; 159(1):164-170. PubMed ID: 32665147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fertility-sparing treatment with conization versus radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: inverse propensity score weighted analysis.
    Ditto A; Martinelli F; Dri M; Leone Roberti Maggiore U; Bogani G; Kusamura S; Paolini B; Somigliana E; Raspagliesi F
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2024 Oct; 34(10):1529-1535. PubMed ID: 39313301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical cancer patients with tumor size ≤ 2 cm: a case-matched control study.
    Chen C; Liu P; Ni Y; Tang L; Xu Y; Bin X; Lang J
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2020 May; 25(5):937-947. PubMed ID: 32062731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.