These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1040 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29776652)

  • 21. Two-Year Outcomes of Valve-in-Valve Using New-Generation Transcatheter Devices Compared With Redo-SAVR.
    Nagasaka T; Koren O; Patel V; Naami R; Naami E; Shechter A; Kohan S; Allison Z; Lerner A; Cheng DE; Chakravarty T; Cheng W; Jilaihawi H; Ishii H; Nakamura M; Makkar RR
    Am J Cardiol; 2023 Nov; 207():380-389. PubMed ID: 37778227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Redo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Failed Surgical Aortic Bioprostheses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Raschpichler M; de Waha S; Holzhey D; Schwarzer G; Flint N; Kaewkes D; Bräuchle PT; Dvir D; Makkar R; Ailawadi G; Abdel-Wahab M; Thiele H; Borger MA
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2022 Dec; 11(24):e7965. PubMed ID: 36533610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Aortic Regurgitation, Time to Aortic Valve Reintervention, and Mortality in Degenerated Trifecta Versus Non-Trifecta Bioprosthesis.
    Abbas AE; Madanat L; Khalili H; Mando R; Kheyrbek M; Chandra R; Niroula S; Hanson I; Dixon S; Renard B; Bloomingdale R; Cami E; Pridham B; Altshuler J; Kindzelski B; Fazzalari F; Shannon F; Vivacqua A
    Am J Cardiol; 2024 Jun; 220():49-55. PubMed ID: 38580038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Renal outcomes in valve-in-valve transcatheter versus redo surgical aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Arjomandi Rad A; Naruka V; Vardanyan R; Salmasi MY; Tasoudis PT; Kendall S; Casula R; Athanasiou T
    J Card Surg; 2022 Nov; 37(11):3743-3753. PubMed ID: 36040611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Redo-aortic valve replacement in prior stentless prosthetic aortic valves: Transcatheter versus surgical approach.
    Choi CH; Cao K; Malaver D; Kincaid EH; Lata A; Kon N; Belford PM; Gandhi SK; Applegate RJ; Zhao DXM
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Jan; 99(1):181-192. PubMed ID: 34402588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus redo surgery for failing surgical aortic bioprostheses: a multicentre propensity score analysis.
    Spaziano M; Mylotte D; Thériault-Lauzier P; De Backer O; Søndergaard L; Bosmans J; Debry N; Modine T; Barbanti M; Tamburino C; Sinning JM; Grube E; Nickenig G; Mellert F; Bleiziffer S; Lange R; de Varennes B; Lachapelle K; Martucci G; Piazza N
    EuroIntervention; 2017 Nov; 13(10):1149-1156. PubMed ID: 28760721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Redo-Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Aortic Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Nasir MM; Ikram A; Usman M; Sarwar J; Ahmed J; Hamza M; Farhan SA; Siddiqi R; Qadar LT; Shah SR; Khalid MR; Memon RS; Hameed I
    Am J Cardiol; 2024 Aug; 225():151-159. PubMed ID: 38723857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus redo surgical aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Ahmed A; Levy KH
    J Card Surg; 2021 Jul; 36(7):2486-2495. PubMed ID: 33797799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve Aortic Valve Replacement as an Alternative to Surgical Re-Replacement.
    Deharo P; Bisson A; Herbert J; Lacour T; Etienne CS; Porto A; Theron A; Collart F; Bourguignon T; Cuisset T; Fauchier L
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2020 Aug; 76(5):489-499. PubMed ID: 32731926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus repeat surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with a failed aortic bioprosthesis.
    Majmundar M; Doshi R; Kumar A; Johnston D; Brockett J; Kanaa'N A; Lahorra JA; Svensson LG; Krishnaswamy A; Reed GW; Puri R; Kapadia SR; Kalra A
    EuroIntervention; 2022 Feb; 17(15):1227-1237. PubMed ID: 34521614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Meta-Analysis Comparing Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement Versus Redo Surgical Mitral Valve Replacement in Degenerated Bioprosthetic Mitral Valve.
    Ismayl M; Abbasi MA; Mostafa MR; Aboeata A; Vora AN; Ben-Dor I; Anavekar NS; Goldsweig AM
    Am J Cardiol; 2023 Feb; 189():98-107. PubMed ID: 36521415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of Valve Durability and Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Severe Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis and Less-Than-High-Risk for Surgery.
    Tzamalis P; Alataki S; Bramlage P; Schmitt C; Schymik G
    Am J Cardiol; 2020 Apr; 125(8):1202-1208. PubMed ID: 32085868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A comparison of valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement in failed stentless versus stented surgical bioprosthetic aortic valves.
    Choi CH; Cheng V; Malaver D; Kon N; Kincaid EH; Gandhi SK; Applegate RJ; Zhao DXM
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 May; 93(6):1106-1115. PubMed ID: 30588736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Clinical outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in failed bioprosthetic surgical valves vs. native aortic stenosis: insights from a meta-analysis.
    Yashima F; Yokoyama Y; Takagi H; Briasoulis A; Kuno T
    Cardiovasc Interv Ther; 2022 Jan; 37(1):182-190. PubMed ID: 33206349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation for degenerated bioprosthetic heart valves.
    Eggebrecht H; Schäfer U; Treede H; Boekstegers P; Babin-Ebell J; Ferrari M; Möllmann H; Baumgartner H; Carrel T; Kahlert P; Lange P; Walther T; Erbel R; Mehta RH; Thielmann M
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Nov; 4(11):1218-27. PubMed ID: 22115663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus redo aortic valve replacement: which procedure for which patient?
    Hutt E; Mehra N; Desai MY
    Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther; 2022 Dec; 20(12):911-918. PubMed ID: 36433699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Transcatheter ViV Versus Redo Surgical AVR for the Management of Failed Biological Prosthesis: Early and Late Outcomes in a Propensity-Matched Cohort.
    Tam DY; Dharma C; Rocha RV; Ouzounian M; Wijeysundera HC; Austin PC; Chikwe J; Gaudino M; Fremes SE
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Mar; 13(6):765-774. PubMed ID: 31954671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. What is the best approach in a patient with a failed aortic bioprosthetic valve: transcatheter aortic valve replacement or redo aortic valve replacement?
    Tourmousoglou C; Rao V; Lalos S; Dougenis D
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2015 Jun; 20(6):837-43. PubMed ID: 25754372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation for failing surgical aortic stentless bioprosthetic valves: A single-center experience.
    Duncan A; Davies S; Di Mario C; Moat N
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Jul; 150(1):91-8. PubMed ID: 25869089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Severe Aortic Stenosis in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease Stages 3b to 5.
    D'Errigo P; Moretti C; D'Ascenzo F; Rosato S; Biancari F; Barbanti M; Santini F; Ranucci M; Miceli A; Tamburino C; Onorati F; Santoro G; Grossi C; Fusco D; Seccareccia F;
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Aug; 102(2):540-7. PubMed ID: 27130249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 52.