These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29777251)

  • 21. Perception of occlusal plane that is nonparallel to interpupillary and commissural lines but with the maxillary dental midline ideally positioned.
    Revilla-León M; Meyer MJ; Barrington JJ; Sones A; Umorin MP; Taleghani M; Zandinejad A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Nov; 122(5):482-490. PubMed ID: 31003694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The reliability of 3 sagittal reference planes in the assessment of Class I and Class III treatment.
    Palleck S; Foley TF; Hall-Scott J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Apr; 119(4):426-35. PubMed ID: 11298316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Variability of the inclination of anatomic horizontal reference planes of the craniofacial complex in relation to the true horizontal line in orthognathic patients.
    Zebeib AM; Naini FB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Dec; 146(6):740-7. PubMed ID: 25432255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Orientation-sella-nasion or Frankfort horizontal.
    Ricketts RM; Schulhof RJ; Bagha L
    Am J Orthod; 1976 Jun; 69(6):648-54. PubMed ID: 1064336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Dentoalveolar compensation according to skeletal discrepancy and overjet in skeletal Class III patients.
    Kim SJ; Kim KH; Yu HS; Baik HS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Mar; 145(3):317-24. PubMed ID: 24582023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Changes in cranial base morphology in different malocclusions.
    Polat OO; Kaya B
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2007 Nov; 10(4):216-21. PubMed ID: 17973688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Cephalometric analysis of the relationship between occlusal plane and sagittal position of the mandible].
    Ye R; Wang S; Pei J; Zhao M
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2012 Dec; 30(6):610-4. PubMed ID: 23330371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reliability of anatomic reference planes in establishing the occlusal plane in different jaw relationships: a cephalometric study.
    Kumar P; Parkash H; Bhargava A; Gupta S; Bagga DK
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2013 Dec; 13(4):571-7. PubMed ID: 24431794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Significance of the cant of the posterior occlusal plane in class II division 1 malocclusions.
    Fushima K; Kitamura Y; Mita H; Sato S; Suzuki Y; Kim YH
    Eur J Orthod; 1996 Feb; 18(1):27-40. PubMed ID: 8746175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of functional versus bisected occlusal planes on the Wits appraisal.
    Thayer TA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 May; 97(5):422-6. PubMed ID: 2333856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Individual variation of the distance between nasion and Frankfort horizontal plane-an error factor of facebow in semi-adjustable articulators.
    Casagrande Urdalleta DP; Olmedo RR; Cacciuttolo Fábrega FR; Biotti Picand JL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Oct; 128(4):604.e1-604.e5. PubMed ID: 36309468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [A new method to orthodontically correct dental occlusal plane canting: wave-shaped arch].
    Zheng X; Hu XX; Ma N; Chen XH
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2017 Feb; 49(1):176-80. PubMed ID: 28203027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Camouflage treatment guided by facial improvement in hyperdivergent skeletal class II malocclusion.
    Wang H; Jiang L; Yi Y; Li H; Lan T
    Ann Transl Med; 2022 Feb; 10(4):163. PubMed ID: 35280430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Nonsurgical treatment of a hyperdivergent skeletal Class III patient with mini-screw-assisted mandibular dentition distalization and flattening of the occlusal plane.
    He Y; Wang Y; Wang X; Wang J; Bai D; Guo Y
    Angle Orthod; 2022 Mar; 92(2):287-293. PubMed ID: 34874988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Photographic Assessment of Cephalometric Measurements in Skeletal Class II Cases: A Comparative Study.
    Mehta P; Sagarkar RM; Mathew S
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2017 Jun; 11(6):ZC60-ZC64. PubMed ID: 28764295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cephalometric Evaluation of Natural Head Position in Lingayat Population of Karnataka.
    Singh I; Kumar KK; Raj P; Babu RH; Pithani N; Thekiya AH
    J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2019 Feb; 11(Suppl 1):S59-S66. PubMed ID: 30923432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of orthodontic treatment with premolar extractions on occlusal planes: A retrospective study.
    Zhu Y; Xiong X; Yang W; Wu Y; Liu J; Ye C; Zhang Q; Han SLR; Wang J
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2023 Aug; 26(3):356-363. PubMed ID: 36300831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Craniofacial parameters of Syrian children with β-thalassemia major.
    Takriti M; Dashash M
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 May; 2(2):135-43. PubMed ID: 25426607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cephalometric reference planes--sella nasion vs Frankfort horizontal.
    Ellis E; McNamara J
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1988; 3(2):81-7. PubMed ID: 3251959
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The Probability Index.
    Gramling JF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Feb; 107(2):165-71. PubMed ID: 7847275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.