169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29777323)
1. Andriod Device-Based Cervical Cancer Screening for Resource-Poor Settings.
Kudva V; Prasad K; Guruvare S
J Digit Imaging; 2018 Oct; 31(5):646-654. PubMed ID: 29777323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Colposcopy, cervicography, speculoscopy and endoscopy. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.
van Niekerk WA; Dunton CJ; Richart RM; Hilgarth M; Kato H; Kaufman RH; Mango LJ; Nozawa S; Robinowitz M
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):33-49. PubMed ID: 9479322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An Observational Study of Deep Learning and Automated Evaluation of Cervical Images for Cancer Screening.
Hu L; Bell D; Antani S; Xue Z; Yu K; Horning MP; Gachuhi N; Wilson B; Jaiswal MS; Befano B; Long LR; Herrero R; Einstein MH; Burk RD; Demarco M; Gage JC; Rodriguez AC; Wentzensen N; Schiffman M
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2019 Sep; 111(9):923-932. PubMed ID: 30629194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Efficacy of visual inspection of the cervix using acetic acid in cervical cancer screening: a comparison with cervical cytology.
Akinola OI; Fabamwo AO; Oshodi YA; Banjo AA; Odusanya O; Gbadegesin A; Tayo A
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Oct; 27(7):703-5. PubMed ID: 17999297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantitative Screening of Cervical Cancers for Low-Resource Settings: Pilot Study of Smartphone-Based Endoscopic Visual Inspection After Acetic Acid Using Machine Learning Techniques.
Bae JK; Roh HJ; You JS; Kim K; Ahn Y; Askaruly S; Park K; Yang H; Jang GJ; Moon KH; Jung W
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2020 Mar; 8(3):e16467. PubMed ID: 32159521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of visual inspection of cervix and Pap smear for cervical cancer screening.
Tayyeb R; Khawaja NP; Malik N
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2003 Apr; 13(4):201-3. PubMed ID: 12718787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Pap smear, visual inspection with acetic acid, and digital cervicography as cervical screening strategies.
Khodakarami N; Farzaneh F; Aslani F; Alizadeh K
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Nov; 284(5):1247-52. PubMed ID: 21188404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A mobile-phone based high-resolution microendoscope to image cervical precancer.
Grant BD; Quang T; Possati-Resende JC; Scapulatempo-Neto C; de Macedo Matsushita G; Mauad EC; Stoler MH; Castle PE; Guerreiro Fregnani JHT; Schmeler KM; Richards-Kortum R
PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0211045. PubMed ID: 30726252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Acetowhite region segmentation in uterine cervix images using a registered ratio image.
Liu J; Li L; Wang L
Comput Biol Med; 2018 Feb; 93():47-55. PubMed ID: 29275099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Visual inspection of the uterine cervix after the application of acetic acid in the detection of cervical carcinoma and its precursors.
Sankaranarayanan R; Wesley R; Somanathan T; Dhakad N; Shyamalakumary B; Amma NS; Parkin DM; Nair MK
Cancer; 1998 Nov; 83(10):2150-6. PubMed ID: 9827719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Visual inspection with acetic acid and cytology as screening methods for cervical lesions in Cameroon.
Doh AS; Nkele NN; Achu P; Essimbi F; Essame O; Nkegoum B
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2005 May; 89(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 15847890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Role of VIA in cervical cancer screening in low-resource countries.
Nahar KN; Nessa A; Shamim S; Nasrin B; Hossain F; Begum N
Mymensingh Med J; 2011 Jul; 20(3):528-35. PubMed ID: 21804524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A study of cervical cancer screening for prevention of carcinoma cervix.
Christe DM; Mohanambal M; Ramamurthy V; Snehaa NB
J Indian Med Assoc; 2008 Dec; 106(12):779-80, 782. PubMed ID: 19370947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of visual inspection and Papanicolau (PAP) smears for cervical cancer screening in Honduras: should PAP smears be abandoned?
Perkins RB; Langrish SM; Stern LJ; Figueroa J; Simon CJ
Trop Med Int Health; 2007 Sep; 12(9):1018-25. PubMed ID: 17875013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cervicography: adjunctive cervical cancer screening by primary care clinicians.
Ferris DG; Payne P; Frisch LE; Milner FH; diPaola FM; Petry LJ
J Fam Pract; 1993 Aug; 37(2):158-64. PubMed ID: 8336097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of Smartphones as Adjuvant Tools for Cervical Cancer Screening in Low-Resource Settings.
Ricard-Gauthier D; Wisniak A; Catarino R; van Rossum AF; Meyer-Hamme U; Negulescu R; Scaringella S; Jinoro J; Vassilakos P; Petignat P
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2015 Oct; 19(4):295-300. PubMed ID: 26247260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cervicography as an adjunct to cytologic screening.
Greenberg MD; Campion MJ; Rutledge LH
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 1993 Mar; 20(1):13-29. PubMed ID: 8332306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cervicography: an intermediate triage test for the evaluation of cervical atypia.
Ferris DG; Payne P; Frisch LE
J Fam Pract; 1993 Nov; 37(5):463-8. PubMed ID: 8228858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Automation of Detection of Cervical Cancer Using Convolutional Neural Networks.
Kudva V; Prasad K; Guruvare S
Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 2018; 46(2):135-145. PubMed ID: 30055530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA), Lugol's iodine (VILI), cervical cytology and HPV testing as cervical screening tools in Latin America. This report refers to partial results from the LAMS (Latin AMerican Screening) study.
Sarian LO; Derchain SF; Naud P; Roteli-Martins C; Longatto-Filho A; Tatti S; Branca M; Erzen M; Serpa-Hammes L; Matos J; Gontijo R; Bragança JF; Lima TP; Maeda MY; Lörincz A; Dores GB; Costa S; Syrjänen S; Syrjänen K
J Med Screen; 2005; 12(3):142-9. PubMed ID: 16156945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
