342 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29777391)
1. Shaping ability of reciprocating single-file systems in severely curved canals: WaveOne and Reciproc versus WaveOne Gold and Reciproc blue.
Bürklein S; Flüch S; Schäfer E
Odontology; 2019 Jan; 107(1):96-102. PubMed ID: 29777391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper.
Bürklein S; Hinschitza K; Dammaschke T; Schäfer E
Int Endod J; 2012 May; 45(5):449-61. PubMed ID: 22188401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of WaveOne, Reciproc and OneShape single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Saber SE; Nagy MM; Schäfer E
Int Endod J; 2015 Jan; 48(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 24673737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Shaping ability of different single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Bürklein S; Benten S; Schäfer E
Int Endod J; 2013 Jun; 46(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 23240965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Apical transportation and canal straightening with different continuously tapered rotary file systems in severely curved root canals: F6 SkyTaper and OneShape versus Mtwo.
Bürklein S; Jäger PG; Schäfer E
Int Endod J; 2017 Oct; 50(10):983-990. PubMed ID: 27809348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Shaping ability of ProTaper NEXT and BT-RaCe nickel-titanium instruments in severely curved root canals.
Bürklein S; Mathey D; Schäfer E
Int Endod J; 2015 Aug; 48(8):774-81. PubMed ID: 25156248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of Different Glide Path Files on Apical Debris Extrusion in Curved Root Canals.
Gunes B; Yesildal Yeter K
J Endod; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1191-1194. PubMed ID: 29884338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of 5 Heat-treated Nickel-titanium Reciprocating Systems in Canals with Single and Double Curvatures.
Al-Obaida MI; Merdad K; Alanazi MS; Altwaijry H; AlFaraj M; Alkhamis AA; Al-Madi EM
J Endod; 2019 Oct; 45(10):1237-1241. PubMed ID: 31420109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cyclic fatigue using severely curved canals and torsional resistance of thermally treated reciprocating instruments.
Silva EJNL; Vieira VTL; Hecksher F; Dos Santos Oliveira MRS; Dos Santos Antunes H; Moreira EJL
Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Sep; 22(7):2633-2638. PubMed ID: 29392414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cyclic fatigue resistance of new reciprocating files (Reciproc Blue, WaveOne Gold, and SmartTrack) in two different curved canals.
Topçuoğlu HS; Demirbuga S; Düzgün S; Topçuoğlu G
J Investig Clin Dent; 2018 Aug; 9(3):e12344. PubMed ID: 29863315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of Reciproc Blue, Reciproc, and WaveOne Gold Reciprocating Instruments.
Keskin C; Inan U; Demiral M; Keleş A
J Endod; 2017 Aug; 43(8):1360-1363. PubMed ID: 28662877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of preparation of curved root canals with Hyflex CM and Revo-S rotary nickel-titanium instruments.
Bürklein S; Börjes L; Schäfer E
Int Endod J; 2014 May; 47(5):470-6. PubMed ID: 23998461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of Reciproc, WaveOne, and WaveOne Gold Nickel-Titanium Instruments.
Özyürek T
J Endod; 2016 Oct; 42(10):1536-9. PubMed ID: 27520406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of five single-file systems in the preparation of severely curved root canals: an ex vivo study.
Liu Y; Chen M; Tang W; Liu C; Du M
BMC Oral Health; 2022 Dec; 22(1):649. PubMed ID: 36577985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative study of different novel nickel-titanium rotary systems for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals.
Capar ID; Ertas H; Ok E; Arslan H; Ertas ET
J Endod; 2014 Jun; 40(6):852-6. PubMed ID: 24862716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of OneShape, HyFlex EDM, WaveOne Gold, and Reciproc Blue Nickel-titanium Instruments.
Gündoğar M; Özyürek T
J Endod; 2017 Jul; 43(7):1192-1196. PubMed ID: 28527845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Schäfer E; Vlassis M
Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 15056350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficacy of reciprocating instruments for removing filling material in curved canals obturated with a single-cone technique: a micro-computed tomographic analysis.
Fruchi Lde C; Ordinola-Zapata R; Cavenago BC; Hungaro Duarte MA; Bueno CE; De Martin AS
J Endod; 2014 Jul; 40(7):1000-4. PubMed ID: 24935552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Analysis of Canal Transportation and Centering Ability of Single-file Systems.
Hasheminia SM; Farhad A; Sheikhi M; Soltani P; Hendi SS; Ahmadi M
J Endod; 2018 Dec; 44(12):1788-1791. PubMed ID: 30390970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Surface nanoscale profile of WaveOne, WaveOne Gold, Reciproc, and Reciproc blue, before and after root canal preparation.
AlRahabi AMK; Atta RM
Odontology; 2019 Oct; 107(4):500-506. PubMed ID: 30927151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
