217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29777515)
1. Bottom-up attention capture with distractor and target singletons defined in the same (color) dimension is not a matter of feature uncertainty.
Weichselbaum H; Ansorge U
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Aug; 80(6):1350-1361. PubMed ID: 29777515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Distractor rejection in visual search breaks down with more than a single distractor feature.
Kerzel D; Barras C
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 May; 42(5):648-57. PubMed ID: 26594882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Region-based shielding of visual search from salient distractors: Target detection is impaired with same- but not different-dimension distractors.
Sauter M; Liesefeld HR; Zehetleitner M; Müller HJ
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Apr; 80(3):622-642. PubMed ID: 29299850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Expectancies modulate attentional capture by salient color singletons.
Geyer T; Müller HJ; Krummenacher J
Vision Res; 2008 May; 48(11):1315-26. PubMed ID: 18407311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Oculomotor capture by colour singletons depends on intertrial priming.
Becker SI
Vision Res; 2010 Oct; 50(21):2116-26. PubMed ID: 20691720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Oculomotor capture by search-irrelevant features in visual working memory: on the crucial role of target-distractor similarity.
Foerster RM; Schneider WX
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jul; 82(5):2379-2392. PubMed ID: 32166644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Oculomotor capture by irrelevant onsets with and without color contrast.
Becker SI; Lewis AJ
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2015 Mar; 1339():60-71. PubMed ID: 25708201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Target uncertainty does not lead to greater singleton distractor interference when target shapes are not interchangeable with nontarget shapes.
Berry JH
Vision Res; 2013 Mar; 80():31-40. PubMed ID: 23385060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Visual search for color and shape: when is the gaze guided by feature relationships, when by feature values?
Becker SI; Harris AM; Venini D; Retell JD
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Feb; 40(1):264-91. PubMed ID: 23875572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Spatial filtering restricts the attentional window during both singleton and feature-based visual search.
Berggren N; Eimer M
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jul; 82(5):2360-2378. PubMed ID: 31993978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Attentional control during visual search: the effect of irrelevant singletons.
Theeuwes J; Burger R
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1998 Oct; 24(5):1342-53. PubMed ID: 9778827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A search order lost effect: ignoring a singleton distractor affects visual search efficiency.
Kumada T
Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(14):1402-13. PubMed ID: 20025896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The impact of the irrelevant: the task environment modulates the impact of irrelevant features in response selection.
Mast F; Frings C
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Dec; 40(6):2198-213. PubMed ID: 25328998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Involuntary top-down control by search-irrelevant features: Visual working memory biases attention in an object-based manner.
Foerster RM; Schneider WX
Cognition; 2018 Mar; 172():37-45. PubMed ID: 29223864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [The effect of stimulus-driven factor on attentional capture: evidence from visual search paradigm containing static and dynamic stimuli].
Kawahara J
Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1996 Apr; 67(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 8699641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Age-related effects of attentional and oculomotor capture by onsets and color singletons as a function of experience.
Colcombe AM; Kramer AF; Irwin DE; Peterson MS; Colcombe S; Hahn S
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2003 Jun; 113(2):205-25. PubMed ID: 12750049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Search efficiency is not sufficient: The nature of search modulates stimulus-driven attention.
Jung K; Han SW; Min Y
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jan; 81(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 30276609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Taking a closer look at visual search: Just how feature-agnostic is singleton detection mode?
Harris AM; Jacoby O; Remington RW; Travis SL; Mattingley JB
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Apr; 81(3):654-665. PubMed ID: 30603988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of task set-modulating attentional capture depends on the distractor cost in visual search: evidence from N2pc.
Zhao D; Liang S; Jin Z; Li L
Neuroreport; 2014 Jul; 25(10):737-42. PubMed ID: 24840929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Distinct roles of the intraparietal sulcus and temporoparietal junction in attentional capture from distractor features: An individual differences approach.
Painter DR; Dux PE; Mattingley JB
Neuropsychologia; 2015 Jul; 74():50-62. PubMed ID: 25724234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
