These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29777548)

  • 1. Higher contact force during radiofrequency ablation leads to a much larger increase in edema as compared to chronic lesion size.
    Thomas S; Silvernagel J; Angel N; Kholmovski E; Ghafoori E; Hu N; Ashton J; Dosdall DJ; MacLeod R; Ranjan R
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2018 Aug; 29(8):1143-1149. PubMed ID: 29777548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Characterization of Gadolinium Contrast Enhancement of Radiofrequency Ablation Lesions in Predicting Edema and Chronic Lesion Size.
    Ghafoori E; Kholmovski EG; Thomas S; Silvernagel J; Angel N; Hu N; Dosdall DJ; MacLeod R; Ranjan R
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2017 Nov; 10(11):. PubMed ID: 29079664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Characterization of edema after cryo and radiofrequency ablations based on serial magnetic resonance imaging.
    Yamashita K; Kholmovski E; Ghafoori E; Kamali R; Kwan E; Lichter J; MacLeod R; Dosdall DJ; Ranjan R
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2019 Feb; 30(2):255-262. PubMed ID: 30375090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Acute noncontrast T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging predicts chronic radiofrequency ablation lesions.
    Kholmovski EG; Silvernagel J; Angel N; Vijayakumar S; Thomas S; Dosdall D; MacLeod R; Marrouche NF; Ranjan R
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2018 Nov; 29(11):1556-1562. PubMed ID: 30106244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance guided ablation and intra-procedural visualization of evolving radiofrequency lesions in the left ventricle.
    Krahn PRP; Singh SM; Ramanan V; Biswas L; Yak N; Anderson KJT; Barry J; Pop M; Wright GA
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2018 Mar; 20(1):20. PubMed ID: 29544514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Effective Contact Force to Minimize Edema Relative to Chronic Lesion Formation During Radiofrequency Ablation in Ventricular Wall.
    Yamashita K; Ghafoori E; Silvernagel J; Ashton J; J Dosdall D; MacLeod R; Ranjan R
    Int Heart J; 2019 Nov; 60(6):1407-1414. PubMed ID: 31735778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The force stability of tissue contact and lesion size index during radiofrequency ablation: An ex-vivo study.
    Parwani AS; Hohendanner F; Bode D; Kuhlmann S; Blaschke F; Lacour P; Heinzel FR; Pieske B; Boldt LH
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2020 Mar; 43(3):327-331. PubMed ID: 32091133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predictors of Lesions Contiguity and Transmurality in Canine Ventricular Models After Catheter Ablation.
    El Hajjar AH; Mekhael M; Huang C; Noujaim C; Zhang Y; Kholmovski E; Ayoub T; Lim CH; Marrouche N
    Front Cardiovasc Med; 2022; 9():920539. PubMed ID: 35811729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. MRI-Guided Cardiac RF Ablation for Comparing MRI Characteristics of Acute Lesions and Associated Electrophysiologic Voltage Reductions.
    Krahn PRP; Biswas L; Ferguson S; Ramanan V; Barry J; Singh SM; Pop M; Wright GA
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2022 Aug; 69(8):2657-2666. PubMed ID: 35171765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Lesion characteristics between cryoballoon ablation and radiofrequency ablation with a contact force-sensing catheter: Late-gadolinium enhancement magnetic resonance imaging assessment.
    Kurose J; Kiuchi K; Fukuzawa K; Takami M; Mori S; Suehiro H; Nagamatsu YI; Akita T; Takemoto M; Yatomi A; Nakamura T; Sakai J; Watanabe Y; Shimoyama S; Negi N; Kyotani K; Hirata KI
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2020 Oct; 31(10):2572-2581. PubMed ID: 32648326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Initial impedance decrease as an indicator of good catheter contact: insights from radiofrequency ablation with force sensing catheters.
    Reichlin T; Knecht S; Lane C; Kühne M; Nof E; Chopra N; Tadros TM; Reddy VY; Schaer B; John RM; Osswald S; Stevenson WG; Sticherling C; Michaud GF
    Heart Rhythm; 2014 Feb; 11(2):194-201. PubMed ID: 24177370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the lesion formation and safety in ex vivo porcine heart study: Using ThermoCool SmartTouch and ThermoCool SmartTouch-SF catheters.
    Guo M; Qu L; Zhang N; Yan R; Xue Z; Sun M; Wang R
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2021 Aug; 32(8):2077-2089. PubMed ID: 33928716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. High-power short-duration versus standard radiofrequency ablation: Insights on lesion metrics.
    Bourier F; Duchateau J; Vlachos K; Lam A; Martin CA; Takigawa M; Kitamura T; Frontera A; Cheniti G; Pambrun T; Klotz N; Denis A; Derval N; Cochet H; Sacher F; Hocini M; Haïssaguerre M; Jais P
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2018 Nov; 29(11):1570-1575. PubMed ID: 30168230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contact force guided radiofrequency current application at developing myocardium.
    Backhoff D; Müller MJ; Betz T; Arnold A; Schneider H; Paul T; Krause U
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2022 Aug; 33(8):1757-1766. PubMed ID: 35578015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Non-contrast-enhanced T
    Guttman MA; Tao S; Fink S; Kolandaivelu A; Halperin HR; Herzka DA
    Magn Reson Med; 2018 Feb; 79(2):879-889. PubMed ID: 28497622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Longer Duration Versus Increasing Power During Radiofrequency Ablation Yields Different Ablation Lesion Characteristics.
    Borne RT; Sauer WH; Zipse MM; Zheng L; Tzou W; Nguyen DT
    JACC Clin Electrophysiol; 2018 Jul; 4(7):902-908. PubMed ID: 30025690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lesion Size and Safety Comparison Between the Novel Flex Tip on the FlexAbility Ablation Catheter and the Solid Tips on the ThermoCool and ThermoCool SF Ablation Catheters.
    Winterfield JR; Jensen J; Gilbert T; Marchlinski F; Natale A; Packer D; Reddy V; Mahapatra S; Wilber DJ
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2016 Jan; 27(1):102-9. PubMed ID: 26359632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Blanking period after radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation guided by ablation lesion maturation based on serial MR imaging.
    Yamashita K; Kwan E; Kamali R; Ghafoori E; Steinberg BA; MacLeod RS; Dosdall DJ; Ranjan R
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2020 Feb; 31(2):450-456. PubMed ID: 31916637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of ventricular radiofrequency lesions in sheep using standard irrigated tip catheter versus catheter ablation enabling direct visualization.
    Sacher F; Derval N; Jadidi A; Scherr D; Hocini M; Haissaguerre M; Dos Santos P; Jais P
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2012 Aug; 23(8):869-73. PubMed ID: 22554117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimal conditions for high-power, short-duration radiofrequency ablation using a novel, flexible-tipped, force-sensing catheter.
    Piccini JP; Dave AS; Holmes DS; Winterfield JR; Tranter JH; Pipenhagen C; Moon LB; Ambrosius NM; Overmann JA; Boudlali H; Thao R; Geurkink C; Thamavong Z; Jensen JA; Fish JM
    Heart Rhythm O2; 2023 Jul; 4(7):440-447. PubMed ID: 37520016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.