275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29777798)
1. High and unclear risk of bias assessments are predominant in diagnostic accuracy studies included in Cochrane reviews.
Di Girolamo N; Winter A; Meursinge Reynders R
J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Sep; 101():73-78. PubMed ID: 29777798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Risk of bias assessment of test comparisons was uncommon in comparative accuracy systematic reviews: an overview of reviews.
Yang B; Vali Y; Dehmoobad Sharifabadi A; Harris IM; Beese S; Davenport C; Hyde C; Takwoingi Y; Whiting P; Langendam MW; Leeflang MMG
J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Nov; 127():167-174. PubMed ID: 32798714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Risk of bias assessments for selective reporting were inadequate in the majority of Cochrane reviews.
Saric F; Barcot O; Puljak L
J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Aug; 112():53-58. PubMed ID: 31009658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cochrane risk of bias tool was used inadequately in the majority of non-Cochrane systematic reviews.
Puljak L; Ramic I; Arriola Naharro C; Brezova J; Lin YC; Surdila AA; Tomajkova E; Farias Medeiros I; Nikolovska M; Poklepovic Pericic T; Barcot O; Suarez Salvado M
J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Jul; 123():114-119. PubMed ID: 32247026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of the CONSORT statement on the amount of "unclear" Risk of Bias reporting in Cochrane Systematic Reviews.
Rademaker MM; Ramakers GGJ; Smit AL; Hooft L; Stegeman I
PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0235535. PubMed ID: 32650340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The judgement of biases included in the category "other bias" in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: a systematic survey.
Babic A; Pijuk A; Brázdilová L; Georgieva Y; Raposo Pereira MA; Poklepovic Pericic T; Puljak L
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Apr; 19(1):77. PubMed ID: 30971219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Risk of bias over time in updates of Cochrane oral health reviews.
Faggion CM; Aranda L; Pandis N; Alarcón MA; Diaz KT
J Dent; 2019 Jan; 80():63-68. PubMed ID: 30342067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Risk of bias assessment of sequence generation: a study of 100 systematic reviews of trials.
Wuytack F; Regan M; Biesty L; Meskell P; Lutomski JE; O'Donnell M; Treweek S; Devane D
Syst Rev; 2019 Jan; 8(1):13. PubMed ID: 30621793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Risk of bias assessments and reporting quality of systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials examining acupuncture for depression: An overview and meta-epidemiology study.
Luo S; Long Y; Xiao W; Wang X; Chen R; Guo Q; Liu J; Shao R; Du L; Chen M
J Evid Based Med; 2020 Feb; 13(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 32112515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews of Non-Randomized Studies of Adverse Cardiovascular Effects of Thiazolidinediones and Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibitors: Application of a New Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool.
Bilandzic A; Fitzpatrick T; Rosella L; Henry D
PLoS Med; 2016 Apr; 13(4):e1001987. PubMed ID: 27046153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Risk of bias judgments for random sequence generation in Cochrane systematic reviews were frequently not in line with Cochrane Handbook.
Barcot O; Boric M; Poklepovic Pericic T; Cavar M; Dosenovic S; Vuka I; Puljak L
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Aug; 19(1):170. PubMed ID: 31382898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A meta-epidemiological study to examine the association between bias and treatment effects in neonatal trials.
Bialy L; Vandermeer B; Lacaze-Masmonteil T; Dryden DM; Hartling L
Evid Based Child Health; 2014 Dec; 9(4):1052-9. PubMed ID: 25504975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Adequacy of risk of bias assessment in surgical vs non-surgical trials in Cochrane reviews: a methodological study.
Barcot O; Boric M; Dosenovic S; Cavar M; Jelicic Kadic A; Poklepovic Pericic T; Vukicevic I; Vuka I; Puljak L
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Sep; 20(1):240. PubMed ID: 32993499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Methodological quality and risk-of-bias assessments in systematic reviews of treatments for peri-implantitis.
Hasuike A; Ueno D; Nagashima H; Kubota T; Tsukune N; Watanabe N; Sato S
J Periodontal Res; 2019 Aug; 54(4):374-387. PubMed ID: 30671962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Risk of bias tools in systematic reviews of health interventions: an analysis of PROSPERO-registered protocols.
Farrah K; Young K; Tunis MC; Zhao L
Syst Rev; 2019 Nov; 8(1):280. PubMed ID: 31730014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How do systematic reviews of acupuncture for pain relief incorporate risk of bias assessments into the synthesis? A methodological study.
Li XQ; Tao KM; Yang GL; Zhou QH; Ling CQ
Acupunct Med; 2016 Apr; 34(2):84-9. PubMed ID: 26526002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Development and validation of methods for assessing the quality of diagnostic accuracy studies.
Whiting P; Rutjes AW; Dinnes J; Reitsma J; Bossuyt PM; Kleijnen J
Health Technol Assess; 2004 Jun; 8(25):iii, 1-234. PubMed ID: 15193208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intra-articular hyaluronic acid injection in treating knee osteoarthritis: assessing risk of bias in systematic reviews with ROBIS tool.
Xing D; Wang B; Zhang W; Yang Z; Hou Y; Chen Y; Lin J
Int J Rheum Dis; 2017 Nov; 20(11):1658-1673. PubMed ID: 29044993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In Cochrane reviews, risk of bias assessments for allocation concealment were frequently not in line with Cochrane's Handbook guidance.
Propadalo I; Tranfic M; Vuka I; Barcot O; Pericic TP; Puljak L
J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Feb; 106():10-17. PubMed ID: 30312657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Overall bias methods and their use in sensitivity analysis of Cochrane reviews were not consistent.
Babic A; Vuka I; Saric F; Proloscic I; Slapnicar E; Cavar J; Poklepovic Pericic T; Pieper D; Puljak L
J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Mar; 119():57-64. PubMed ID: 31734347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
