These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

419 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29778290)

  • 1. Spatial hearing ability of the pigmented Guinea pig (Cavia porcellus): Minimum audible angle and spatial release from masking in azimuth.
    Greene NT; Anbuhl KL; Ferber AT; DeGuzman M; Allen PD; Tollin DJ
    Hear Res; 2018 Aug; 365():62-76. PubMed ID: 29778290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stream segregation with high spatial acuity.
    Middlebrooks JC; Onsan ZA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Dec; 132(6):3896-911. PubMed ID: 23231120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of mouse minimum audible angle determined in prepulse inhibition and operant conditioning procedures.
    Behrens D; Klump GM
    Hear Res; 2016 Mar; 333():167-178. PubMed ID: 26807797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comment on Greene et al.: Spatial hearing ability of the pigmented Guinea pig (Cavia porcellus): Minimum audible angle and spatial release from masking in azimuth.
    Heffner HE; Heffner RS
    Hear Res; 2018 Dec; 370():302-303. PubMed ID: 30352725
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The acoustical cues to sound location in the guinea pig (Cavia porcellus).
    Greene NT; Anbuhl KL; Williams W; Tollin DJ
    Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 316():1-15. PubMed ID: 25051197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development of the head, pinnae, and acoustical cues to sound location in a precocial species, the guinea pig (Cavia porcellus).
    Anbuhl KL; Benichoux V; Greene NT; Brown AD; Tollin DJ
    Hear Res; 2017 Dec; 356():35-50. PubMed ID: 29128159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spatial and temporal disparity in signals and maskers affects signal detection in non-human primates.
    Rocchi F; Dylla ME; Bohlen PA; Ramachandran R
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():1-12. PubMed ID: 27770624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Combination of binaural and harmonic masking release effects in the detection of a single component in complex tones.
    Klein-Hennig M; Dietz M; Hohmann V
    Hear Res; 2018 Mar; 359():23-31. PubMed ID: 29310976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sound localization in noise in normal-hearing listeners.
    Lorenzi C; Gatehouse S; Lever C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Mar; 105(3):1810-20. PubMed ID: 10089604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Azimuthal directional sensitivity of prepulse inhibition of the pinna startle reflex in decerebrate rats.
    Li L; Frost BJ
    Brain Res Bull; 2000 Jan; 51(1):95-100. PubMed ID: 10654587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Auditory cortex responses to interaural time differences in the envelope of low-frequency sound, recorded with MEG in young and older listeners.
    Ross B
    Hear Res; 2018 Dec; 370():22-39. PubMed ID: 30265860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sensitivity of the mouse to changes in azimuthal sound location: angular separation, spectral composition, and sound level.
    Allen PD; Ison JR
    Behav Neurosci; 2010 Apr; 124(2):265-77. PubMed ID: 20364886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Masking release by combined spatial and masker-fluctuation effects in the open sound field.
    Middlebrooks JC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Dec; 142(6):3362. PubMed ID: 29289075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test.
    Cameron S; Dillon H; Newall P
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Slow Temporal Integration Enables Robust Neural Coding and Perception of a Cue to Sound Source Location.
    Brown AD; Tollin DJ
    J Neurosci; 2016 Sep; 36(38):9908-21. PubMed ID: 27656028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spectral contributions to the benefit from spatial separation of speech and noise.
    Dubno JR; Ahlstrom JB; Horwitz AR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2002 Dec; 45(6):1297-310. PubMed ID: 12546495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Neural correlates and mechanisms of spatial release from masking: single-unit and population responses in the inferior colliculus.
    Lane CC; Delgutte B
    J Neurophysiol; 2005 Aug; 94(2):1180-98. PubMed ID: 15857966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of type of emission and masking sound, and their spatial correspondence, on blind and sighted people's ability to echolocate.
    Thaler L; Castillo-Serrano JG; Kish D; Norman LJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2024 Apr; 196():108822. PubMed ID: 38342179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Cochlear Implant Users With and Without Access to Low-Frequency Acoustic Hearing.
    Williges B; Dietz M; Hohmann V; Jürgens T
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of low-pass noise masking on auditory event-related potentials to speech.
    Martin BA; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2005 Apr; 26(2):195-213. PubMed ID: 15809545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.