124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29778923)
1. Quantitative proteomic profiling indicates the difference in reproductive efficiency between Meishan and Duroc boar spermatozoa.
Xinhong L; Zhen L; Fu J; Wang L; Yang Q; Li P; Li Y
Theriogenology; 2018 Aug; 116():71-82. PubMed ID: 29778923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reproduction of F1 Meishan, Fengjing, Minzhu, and Duroc gilts and sows.
Young LD
J Anim Sci; 1995 Mar; 73(3):711-21. PubMed ID: 7608003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reproduction of 3/4 White Composite and 1/4 Duroc, 1/4 Meishan, 1/4 Fengjing, or 1/4 Minzhu gilts and sows.
Young LD
J Anim Sci; 1998 Jun; 76(6):1559-67. PubMed ID: 9655575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Semen characteristics, testicular size, and reproductive hormone concentrations in mature duroc, meishan, fengjing, and minzhu boars.
Borg KE; Lunstra DD; Christenson RK
Biol Reprod; 1993 Sep; 49(3):515-21. PubMed ID: 8399844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative Proteomics and Phosphoproteomics Analysis Reveal the Possible Breed Difference in Yorkshire and Duroc Boar Spermatozoa.
Xu Y; Han Q; Ma C; Wang Y; Zhang P; Li C; Cheng X; Xu H
Front Cell Dev Biol; 2021; 9():652809. PubMed ID: 34336820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of Duroc, Meishan, Fengjing, and Minzhu boars on productivity of mates and growth of first-cross progeny.
Young LD
J Anim Sci; 1992 Jul; 70(7):2020-9. PubMed ID: 1644674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Identification of new protein biomarkers associated with the boar fertility using iTRAQ-based quantitative proteomic analysis.
Chen Y; Wei H; Liu Y; Gao F; Chen Z; Wang P; Li L; Zhang S
Int J Biol Macromol; 2020 Nov; 162():50-59. PubMed ID: 32553959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Histological and transcriptome analyses of testes from Duroc and Meishan boars.
Ding H; Luo Y; Liu M; Huang J; Xu D
Sci Rep; 2016 Feb; 6():20758. PubMed ID: 26865000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of quantitative trait loci affecting intramuscular fat and reproductive traits in pigs using marker-assisted introgression.
Sato S; Ohnishi C; Kikuchi T; Kohira K; Egawa S; Terai S; Nakamura T; Arata S; Komatsuda A; Uemoto Y
Anim Genet; 2014 Dec; 45(6):799-807. PubMed ID: 25099662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Protein expression profiles in Meishan and Duroc sows during mid-gestation reveal differences affecting uterine capacity, endometrial receptivity, and the maternal-fetal Interface.
Wang K; Yang K; Xu Q; Liu Y; Li W; Bai Y; Wang J; Ding C; Liu X; Tang Q; Luo Y; Zheng J; Wu K; Fang M
BMC Genomics; 2019 Dec; 20(1):991. PubMed ID: 31847802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Responses to 19 generations of litter size selection in the Nebraska Index line. I. Reproductive responses estimated in pure line and crossbred litters.
Petry DB; Johnson RK
J Anim Sci; 2004 Apr; 82(4):1000-6. PubMed ID: 15080320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Discovery of predictive biomarkers for litter size in boar spermatozoa.
Kwon WS; Rahman MS; Lee JS; Yoon SJ; Park YJ; Pang MG
Mol Cell Proteomics; 2015 May; 14(5):1230-40. PubMed ID: 25693803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative proteomic identification buffalo spermatozoa during in vitro capacitation.
Hou Z; Fu Q; Huang Y; Zhang P; Chen F; Li M; Xu Z; Yao S; Chen D; Zhang M
Theriogenology; 2019 Mar; 126():303-309. PubMed ID: 30599421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Incidence of unilateral fertilizations after low dose deep intrauterine insemination in spontaneously ovulating sows under field conditions.
Martinez EA; Vazquez JM; Parrilla I; Cuello C; Gil MA; Rodriguez-Martinez H; Roca J; Vazquez JL
Reprod Domest Anim; 2006 Feb; 41(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 16420327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Spatial and temporal gene expression of Fn-type II and cysteine-rich secretory proteins in the reproductive tracts and ejaculated sperm of Chinese Meishan pigs.
Song CY; Gao B; Wu H; Wang XY; Zhou HY; Wang SZ; Li BC; Chen GH; Mao JD
Reprod Domest Anim; 2011 Oct; 46(5):848-53. PubMed ID: 21323754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Contribution of boars to reproductive performance and paternity after homospermic and heterospermic artificial insemination.
Ferreira CE; Sávio DB; Guarise AC; Flach MJ; Gastal GD; Gonçalves AO; Dellagostin OA; Alonso RV; Bianchi I; Corcini CD; Lucia T
Reprod Fertil Dev; 2015 Sep; 27(7):1012-9. PubMed ID: 25483612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Boar genotype as a factor shaping age-related changes in semen parameters and reproduction longevity simulations.
Knecht D; Jankowska-Mąkosa A; Duziński K
Theriogenology; 2017 Aug; 98():50-56. PubMed ID: 28601155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Identification of polymorphism and association analysis with reproductive traits in the porcine RNF4 gene.
Niu BY; Ye LZ; Li FE; Deng CY; Jiang SW; Lei MG; Xiong YZ
Anim Reprod Sci; 2009 Feb; 110(3-4):283-92. PubMed ID: 18358646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Artificial insemination with seminal plasma improves the reproductive performance of frozen-thawed boar epididymal spermatozoa.
Okazaki T; Akiyoshi T; Kan M; Mori M; Teshima H; Shimada M
J Androl; 2012; 33(5):990-8. PubMed ID: 22282435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Proteomic approaches for profiling negative fertility markers in inferior boar spermatozoa.
Kwon WS; Oh SA; Kim YJ; Rahman MS; Park YJ; Pang MG
Sci Rep; 2015 Sep; 5():13821. PubMed ID: 26348888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
