308 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29779276)
1. [Fabrication and accuracy research on 3D printing dental model based on cone beam computed tomography digital modeling].
Zhang HR; Yin LF; Liu YL; Yan LY; Wang N; Liu G; An XL; Liu B
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Apr; 36(2):156-161. PubMed ID: 29779276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [3D printing personalized implant manufactured via fused deposition modeling: an accuracy research].
Wang N; Li J; Wang X; Liu G; Liu B
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2015 Oct; 33(5):509-12. PubMed ID: 26688946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Exploring a new method for superimposition of pre-treatment and post-treatment mandibular digital dental casts in adults].
Dai FF; Liu Y; Xu TM; Chen G
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2018 Apr; 50(2):271-278. PubMed ID: 29643526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of intraoral scanning and CBCT to generate digital and 3D-printed casts by fused deposition modeling and digital light processing.
de Freitas BN; Mendonça LM; Cruvinel PB; de Lacerda TJ; Leite FGJ; Oliveira-Santos C; Tirapelli C
J Dent; 2023 Jan; 128():104387. PubMed ID: 36496106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Precision of three-dimensional printed brackets].
Zhang D; Wang LC; Zhou YH; Liu XM; Li J
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2017 Aug; 49(4):704-708. PubMed ID: 28816292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [A method for rapid extracting three-dimensional root model of vivo tooth from cone beam computed tomography data based on the anatomical characteristics of periodontal ligament].
Zhao YJ; Wang SW; Liu Y; Wang Y
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2017 Feb; 49(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 28203004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative Accuracy of Facial Models Fabricated Using Traditional and 3D Imaging Techniques.
Lincoln KP; Sun AY; Prihoda TJ; Sutton AJ
J Prosthodont; 2016 Apr; 25(3):207-15. PubMed ID: 26381058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reproducibility and accuracy of linear measurements on dental models derived from cone-beam computed tomography compared with digital dental casts.
de Waard O; Rangel FA; Fudalej PS; Bronkhorst EM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Breuning KH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Sep; 146(3):328-36. PubMed ID: 25172255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fabrication of obturator prosthesis by fusing CBCT and digital impression data.
Murat S; Gürbüz A; Kamburoğlu K
Int J Comput Dent; 2018; 21(4):335-344. PubMed ID: 30539176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of accuracy and repeatability using CBCT and a dental scanner by means of 3D software.
Kim SR; Kim CM; Jeong ID; Kim WC; Kim HY; Kim JH
Int J Comput Dent; 2017; 20(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 28294206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of linear and angular changes assessed in digital dental models and cone-beam computed tomography.
Massaro C; Losada C; Cevidanes L; Yatabe M; Garib D; Lauris JRP; Ioshida M; Rey D; Alvarez MA; Benavides E; Rios H; Aristizabal JF; Ruellas AC
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2020 Feb; 23(1):118-128. PubMed ID: 31628885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic accuracy of impression-free digital models.
Akyalcin S; Cozad BE; English JD; Colville CD; Laman S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Dec; 144(6):916-22. PubMed ID: 24286915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dental image replacement on cone beam computed tomography with three-dimensional optical scanning of a dental cast, occlusal bite, or bite tray impression.
Kang SH; Lee JW; Lim SH; Kim YH; Kim MK
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 43(10):1293-301. PubMed ID: 25015906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy assessment of three-dimensional surface reconstructions of teeth from cone beam computed tomography scans.
Al-Rawi B; Hassan B; Vandenberge B; Jacobs R
J Oral Rehabil; 2010 May; 37(5):352-8. PubMed ID: 20180895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of 3-dimensional dental models from different sources: diagnostic accuracy and surface registration analysis.
Akyalcin S; Dyer DJ; English JD; Sar C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Dec; 144(6):831-7. PubMed ID: 24286906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of 3-dimensional computer-aided manufactured single-tooth implant definitive casts.
Buda M; Bratos M; Sorensen JA
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Dec; 120(6):913-918. PubMed ID: 29961627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Hybrid Dental Model Concept Utilizing Fused Deposition Modeling and Digital Light Processing 3D Printing.
Lee D; Lee SY; Kim H; Park C
Int J Prosthodont; 2020; 33(2):229-231. PubMed ID: 32069349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Analysis of intra-arch and interarch measurements from digital models with 2 impression materials and a modeling process based on cone-beam computed tomography.
White AJ; Fallis DW; Vandewalle KS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4):456.e1-9; discussion 456-7. PubMed ID: 20362900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of three-dimensional printed models derived from cone-beam computed tomography.
Ferraro JM; Falter J; Lee S; Watanabe K; Wu TH; Kim DG; Ko CC; Tanaka E; Deguchi T
Angle Orthod; 2022 Nov; 92(6):722-727. PubMed ID: 35852459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy and reproducibility of permanent dentitions and dental arch measurements: comparing three different digital models with a plaster study cast.
Al-Mashraqi AA; Alhammadi MS; Gadi AA; Altharawi RA; Zamim KAH; Halboub E
Int J Comput Dent; 2021 Dec; 24(4):353-362. PubMed ID: 34931771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
