309 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29779276)
21. [Three-dimensional data fusion method for tooth crown and root based on curvature continuity algorithm].
Zhao YJ; Liu Y; Sun YC; Wang Y
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2017 Aug; 49(4):719-723. PubMed ID: 28816295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Accuracy of maxillofacial prototypes fabricated by different 3-dimensional printing technologies using multi-slice and cone-beam computed tomography.
Yousefi F; Shokri A; Farhadian M; Vafaei F; Forutan F
Imaging Sci Dent; 2021 Mar; 51(1):41-47. PubMed ID: 33828960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A new method to assess the accuracy of a Cone Beam Computed Tomography scanner by using a non-contact reverse engineering technique.
Martorelli M; Ausiello P; Morrone R
J Dent; 2014 Apr; 42(4):460-5. PubMed ID: 24412585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effect of length and location of edentulous area on the accuracy of prosthetic treatment plan incorporation into cone-beam computed tomography scans.
Jamjoom FZ; Kim DG; Lee DJ; McGlumphy EA; Yilmaz B
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2018 Jun; 20(3):300-307. PubMed ID: 29399999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Intraoral Scanner, Three-Dimensional Imaging, and Three-Dimensional Printing in the Dental Office.
Nikoyan L; Patel R
Dent Clin North Am; 2020 Apr; 64(2):365-378. PubMed ID: 32111275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Accuracy Assessment of Three-dimensional Surface Reconstructions of In vivo Teeth from Cone-beam Computed Tomography.
Sang YH; Hu HC; Lu SH; Wu YW; Li WR; Tang ZH
Chin Med J (Engl); 2016 Jun; 129(12):1464-70. PubMed ID: 27270544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evaluation of the accuracy of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) generated tooth replicas with application in autotransplantation.
Lee CKJ; Foong KWC; Sim YF; Chew MT
J Dent; 2022 Feb; 117():103908. PubMed ID: 34856326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Evaluation of the fused deposition modeling and the digital light processing techniques in terms of dimensional accuracy of printing dental models used for the fabrication of clear aligners.
Jaber ST; Hajeer MY; Khattab TZ; Mahaini L
Clin Exp Dent Res; 2021 Aug; 7(4):591-600. PubMed ID: 33258297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Accuracy of linear measurements from cone-beam computed tomography-derived surface models of different voxel sizes.
Damstra J; Fourie Z; Huddleston Slater JJ; Ren Y
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jan; 137(1):16.e1-6; discussion 16-7. PubMed ID: 20122425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Accuracy of a chairside fused deposition modeling 3D-printed single-tooth surgical template for implant placement: An in vitro comparison with a light cured template.
Sun Y; Ding Q; Tang L; Zhang L; Sun Y; Xie Q
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Aug; 47(8):1216-1221. PubMed ID: 31109740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [A pilot study on the accuracy of digital model reconstructed by cone beam CT].
Wu JC; Huang JN; Xu XJ
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2010 Oct; 19(5):456-9. PubMed ID: 21161119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Computer aided design and three-dimensional printing for apicoectomy guide template].
Peng L; Wang ZH; Sun YC; Qu W; Han Y; Liang YH
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2018 Oct; 50(5):905-910. PubMed ID: 30337756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of linear measurements on digital models obtained from intraoral and cone-beam computed tomography scans of alginate impressions.
Wiranto MG; Engelbrecht WP; Tutein Nolthenius HE; van der Meer WJ; Ren Y
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jan; 143(1):140-7. PubMed ID: 23273370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Artifact-resistant superimposition of digital dental models and cone-beam computed tomography images.
Lin HH; Chiang WC; Lo LJ; Sheng-Pin Hsu S; Wang CH; Wan SY
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Nov; 71(11):1933-47. PubMed ID: 23911142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Correlation of Panoramic Radiography, Cone-Beam Computed Tomography, and Three-Dimensional Printing in the Assessment of the Spatial Location of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars.
Jaroń A; Gabrysz-Trybek E; Bladowska J; Trybek G
J Clin Med; 2021 Sep; 10(18):. PubMed ID: 34575304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Dentoalveolar mandibular changes with self-ligating versus conventional bracket systems: A CBCT and dental cast study.
Almeida MR; Futagami C; Conti AC; Oltramari-Navarro PV; Navarro Rde L
Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(3):50-7. PubMed ID: 26154456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. In vivo accuracy of tooth surface reconstruction based on CBCT and dental MRI-A clinical pilot study.
Hilgenfeld T; Juerchott A; Deisenhofer UK; Weber D; Rues S; Rammelsberg P; Heiland S; Bendszus M; Schwindling FS
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Sep; 30(9):920-927. PubMed ID: 31257638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Accuracy of open-source software segmentation and paper-based printed three-dimensional models.
Szymor P; Kozakiewicz M; Olszewski R
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Feb; 44(2):202-9. PubMed ID: 26748414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: recommendations for clinical use.
Jacobs R; Salmon B; Codari M; Hassan B; Bornstein MM
BMC Oral Health; 2018 May; 18(1):88. PubMed ID: 29764458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Registration of digital dental models and cone-beam computed tomography images using 3-dimensional planning software: Comparison of the accuracy according to scanning methods and software.
Park JH; Hwang CJ; Choi YJ; Houschyar KS; Yu JH; Bae SY; Cha JY
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2020 Jun; 157(6):843-851. PubMed ID: 32487314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
