These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 297794)

  • 21. [Three-dimensional finite element stress analysis of magnetical retaining and bar retaining in overdenture implants].
    Xu S; Cheng X; Hua X
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1997 Mar; 32(2):105-7. PubMed ID: 10677962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Implant-bone interface characteristics of bioglass dental implants.
    Weinstein AM; Klawitter JJ; Cook SD
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1980 Jan; 14(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 6987233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The remus implant.
    Kay HM
    J Oral Implantol; 1979; 8(4):586-90. PubMed ID: 297802
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Tilting of splinted implants for improved prosthodontic support: a two-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Zampelis A; Rangert B; Heijl L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jun; 97(6 Suppl):S35-43. PubMed ID: 17618932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The retention mechanics of LTI carbon, carbon-coated aluminum oxide, and uncoated aluminum oxide dental implants.
    Cook SD; Weinstein AM; Klawitter JJ
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1983 Sep; 17(5):873-83. PubMed ID: 6352708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The FES implant as a posterior abutment for a fixed prosthesis in the mandible.
    Fagan MJ
    J Ga Dent Assoc; 1979; 52(4):16-7. PubMed ID: 390975
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Stress and strain distribution behavior in the bone due to the effect of cancellous bone, dental implant material and the bone height.
    Hedia HS
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2002; 12(2):111-9. PubMed ID: 12122235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Influence of implant abutment type on stress distribution in bone under various loading conditions using finite element analysis.
    Chun HJ; Shin HS; Han CH; Lee SH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 16634489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Fibro-osteal and osteal integration: a comparative analysis of blade and fixture type dental implants supported by clinical trials.
    Weiss CM
    J Dent Educ; 1988 Dec; 52(12):706-11. PubMed ID: 3057014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Mechanical properties of bone-implant interface: an in vitro comparison of the parameters at placement and at 3 months.
    Brosh T; Persovski Z; Binderman I
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1995; 10(6):729-35. PubMed ID: 8530176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Histologic observations of bone remodeling adjacent to endosteal dental implants.
    Steflik DE; Noel C; McBrayer C; Lake FT; Parr GR; Sisk AL; Hanes PJ
    J Oral Implantol; 1995; 21(2):96-106. PubMed ID: 8699510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Histologic evaluation of hydroxylapatite-coated versus uncoated titanium blade implants in delayed and immediately loaded applications.
    Lum LB; Beirne OR; Curtis DA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1991; 6(4):456-62. PubMed ID: 1820315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A finite element stress analysis of the transmandibular implant system.
    Williams KR; Murphy WM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(2):115-9. PubMed ID: 11843446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Ramus implant.
    Kay HM; Kay GW
    CDS Rev; 1978 Mar; 71(3):22-6. PubMed ID: 367605
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effect of a hydroxyapatite-reinforced polyethylene stress distributor in a dental implant on compressive stress levels in surrounding bone.
    Abu-Hammad OA; Harrison A; Williams D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(4):559-64. PubMed ID: 10960990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Finite element stress analysis of cuneiform and cylindrical threaded implant geometries.
    Cruz M; Lourenço AF; Toledo EM; da Silva Barra LP; de Castro Lemonge AC; Wassall T
    Technol Health Care; 2006; 14(4-5):421-38. PubMed ID: 17065763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Finite element analysis of effect of prosthesis height, angle of force application, and implant offset on supporting bone.
    Sütpideler M; Eckert SE; Zobitz M; An KN
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):819-25. PubMed ID: 15623056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Factorial analysis of variables influencing mechanical characteristics of a single tooth implant placed in the maxilla using finite element analysis and the statistics-based Taguchi method.
    Lin CL; Chang SH; Chang WJ; Kuo YC
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2007 Oct; 115(5):408-16. PubMed ID: 17850430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Structural analysis of bridges over blade implants].
    Niikura K; Niikura K; Hasuike T; Miyake H; Sawada S; Yagiu Y; Shimada J; Yamamoto Y
    Josai Shika Daigaku Kiyo; 1985; 14(2-3):355-61. PubMed ID: 3914318
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Selection of the implant transgingival height for optimal biomechanical properties: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Sun Y; Kong L; Hu K; Xie C; Zhou H; Liu Y; Liu B
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 47(5):393-8. PubMed ID: 18977057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.