These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29780041)

  • 21. Detection of interfacial phenomena with osteoblast-like cell adhesion on hydroxyapatite and oxidized polystyrene by the quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation.
    Tagaya M; Ikoma T; Takemura T; Hanagata N; Okuda M; Yoshioka T; Tanaka J
    Langmuir; 2011 Jun; 27(12):7635-44. PubMed ID: 21595447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The number distribution of complex shear modulus of single cells measured by atomic force microscopy.
    Hiratsuka S; Mizutani Y; Tsuchiya M; Kawahara K; Tokumoto H; Okajima T
    Ultramicroscopy; 2009 Jul; 109(8):937-41. PubMed ID: 19345501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Frequency dependence of viscous and viscoelastic dissipation in coated micro-cantilevers from noise measurement.
    Paolino P; Bellon L
    Nanotechnology; 2009 Oct; 20(40):405705. PubMed ID: 19738311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Quantitative characterization of viscoelastic properties of human prostate correlated with histology.
    Zhang M; Nigwekar P; Castaneda B; Hoyt K; Joseph JV; di Sant'Agnese A; Messing EM; Strang JG; Rubens DJ; Parker KJ
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Jul; 34(7):1033-42. PubMed ID: 18258350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of the viscoelastic properties of cells from different kidney cancer phenotypes measured with atomic force microscopy.
    Rebelo LM; de Sousa JS; Mendes Filho J; Radmacher M
    Nanotechnology; 2013 Feb; 24(5):055102. PubMed ID: 23324556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Quantitative analysis of the cell-surface roughness and viscoelasticity for breast cancer cells discrimination using atomic force microscopy.
    Wang Y; Xu C; Jiang N; Zheng L; Zeng J; Qiu C; Yang H; Xie S
    Scanning; 2016 Nov; 38(6):558-563. PubMed ID: 26750438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Viscoelastic properties of epithelial cells.
    Janshoff A
    Biochem Soc Trans; 2021 Dec; 49(6):2687-2695. PubMed ID: 34854895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Viscoelastic properties of three vocal-fold injectable biomaterials at low audio frequencies.
    Klemuk SA; Titze IR
    Laryngoscope; 2004 Sep; 114(9):1597-603. PubMed ID: 15475789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Atomic force microscopy detects differences in the surface brush of normal and cancerous cells.
    Iyer S; Gaikwad RM; Subba-Rao V; Woodworth CD; Sokolov I
    Nat Nanotechnol; 2009 Jun; 4(6):389-93. PubMed ID: 19498402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Lateral diffusion measurement at high spatial resolution by scanning microphotolysis in a confocal microscope.
    Kubitscheck U; Wedekind P; Peters R
    Biophys J; 1994 Sep; 67(3):948-56. PubMed ID: 7811951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Microrheology of human lung epithelial cells measured by atomic force microscopy.
    Alcaraz J; Buscemi L; Grabulosa M; Trepat X; Fabry B; Farré R; Navajas D
    Biophys J; 2003 Mar; 84(3):2071-9. PubMed ID: 12609908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Optical twisting to monitor the rheology of single cells.
    de Saint Vincent MR
    Biorheology; 2016 May; 53(2):69-80. PubMed ID: 27231840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Quantitative analysis of liver fibrosis in rats with shearwave dispersion ultrasound vibrometry: comparison with dynamic mechanical analysis.
    Zhu Y; Zhang X; Zheng Y; Chen X; Shen Y; Lin H; Guo Y; Wang T; Chen S
    Med Eng Phys; 2014 Nov; 36(11):1401-7. PubMed ID: 24835187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Microviscoelasticity of the apical cell surface of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) within confluent monolayers.
    Feneberg W; Aepfelbacher M; Sackmann E
    Biophys J; 2004 Aug; 87(2):1338-50. PubMed ID: 15298936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Mechanical properties of normal versus cancerous breast cells.
    Smelser AM; Macosko JC; O'Dell AP; Smyre S; Bonin K; Holzwarth G
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2015 Nov; 14(6):1335-47. PubMed ID: 25929519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Viscoelastic shear properties of the fresh porcine lens.
    Schachar RA; Chan RW; Fu M
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2007 Mar; 91(3):366-8. PubMed ID: 17035268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Experimental and numerical tribological studies of a boundary lubricant functionalized poro-viscoelastic PVA hydrogel in normal contact and sliding.
    Blum MM; Ovaert TC
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2012 Oct; 14():248-58. PubMed ID: 22947923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A power-law rheology-based finite element model for single cell deformation.
    Zhou EH; Xu F; Quek ST; Lim CT
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2012 Sep; 11(7):1075-84. PubMed ID: 22307682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Dynamic cell adhesion and viscoelastic signatures distinguish normal from malignant human mammary cells using quartz crystal microbalance.
    Zhou T; Marx KA; Dewilde AH; McIntosh D; Braunhut SJ
    Anal Biochem; 2012 Feb; 421(1):164-71. PubMed ID: 22119070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Acto-myosin cytoskeleton dependent viscosity and shear-thinning behavior of the amoeba cytoplasm.
    Marion S; Guillen N; Bacri JC; Wilhelm C
    Eur Biophys J; 2005 May; 34(3):262-72. PubMed ID: 15711811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.