These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29780193)

  • 21. Peer-review and editorial process of the Ethiopian Medical Journal: ten years assessment of the status of submitted manuscripts.
    Enquselassie F
    Ethiop Med J; 2013 Apr; 51(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 24079153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Early editorial manuscript screening versus obligate peer review: a randomized trial.
    Johnston SC; Lowenstein DH; Ferriero DM; Messing RO; Oksenberg JR; Hauser SL
    Ann Neurol; 2007 Apr; 61(4):A10-2. PubMed ID: 17444512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of the quality and subsequent performance of manuscripts rejected by Clinical Rheumatology: a research report.
    Barajas-Ochoa A; Cisneros-Barrios A; Ramos-Remus C
    Clin Rheumatol; 2022 Aug; 41(8):2541-2551. PubMed ID: 35698009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Try to improve journal quality by improving standards and editing process].
    Zheng JW
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2005 Apr; 14(2):97-8. PubMed ID: 15886825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Journal response types and times: the outcomes of manuscripts finalised for submission by the University of the Free State School of Medicine medical editor, South Africa.
    Joubert G; Mulder T; Steinberg WJ; Botes J
    Pan Afr Med J; 2020; 36():212. PubMed ID: 32963678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Manuscript rejection in ophthalmology and visual science journals: identifying and avoiding the common pitfalls.
    Wyness T; McGhee CNj; Patel DV
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2009 Dec; 37(9):864-7. PubMed ID: 20092595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Does masking author identity improve peer review quality? A randomized controlled trial. PEER Investigators.
    Justice AC; Cho MK; Winker MA; Berlin JA; Rennie D
    JAMA; 1998 Jul; 280(3):240-2. PubMed ID: 9676668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. What makes a plant science manuscript successful for publication?
    Setter TL; Munns R; Stefanova K; Shabala S
    Funct Plant Biol; 2020 Nov; 47(12):1138-1146. PubMed ID: 32693907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The nursing research corner.
    N J Nurse; 2002; 32(6):11. PubMed ID: 12238011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Impact Factors and Prediction of Popular Topics in a Journal.
    Nielsen MB; Seitz K
    Ultraschall Med; 2016 Aug; 37(4):343-5. PubMed ID: 27490462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Are Reviewers' Scores Influenced by Citations to Their Own Work? An Analysis of Submitted Manuscripts and Peer Reviewer Reports.
    Schriger DL; Kadera SP; von Elm E
    Ann Emerg Med; 2016 Mar; 67(3):401-406.e6. PubMed ID: 26518378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Statistical inference in abstracts of major medical and epidemiology journals 1975-2014: a systematic review.
    Stang A; Deckert M; Poole C; Rothman KJ
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2017 Jan; 32(1):21-29. PubMed ID: 27858205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Metrics for Original Research Articles in the AJR: From First Submission to Final Publication.
    Rosenkrantz AB; Harisinghani M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jun; 204(6):1152-6. PubMed ID: 26001223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Fate of manuscripts rejected for publication in the AJR.
    Chew FS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1991 Mar; 156(3):627-32. PubMed ID: 1899764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Predatory journals in otorhinolaryngology].
    Lüers JC; Jansen S; Klußmann JP
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2023 Feb; 102(2):111-117. PubMed ID: 36436507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Retrospective analysis of the quality of reports by author-suggested and non-author-suggested reviewers in journals operating on open or single-blind peer review models.
    Kowalczuk MK; Dudbridge F; Nanda S; Harriman SL; Patel J; Moylan EC
    BMJ Open; 2015 Sep; 5(9):e008707. PubMed ID: 26423855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Impact of study outcome on submission and acceptance metrics for peer reviewed medical journals: six year retrospective review of all completed GlaxoSmithKline human drug research studies.
    Evoniuk G; Mansi B; DeCastro B; Sykes J
    BMJ; 2017 Apr; 357():j1726. PubMed ID: 28432051
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Submitting a Manuscript to a Scientific Journal.
    Moore S
    Respir Care; 2023 Sep; 68(9):1314-1319. PubMed ID: 37253607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Submission of scientifically sound and ethical manuscripts to peer-reviewed journals - a reviewer's personal perspective on bioanalytical publications.
    Weng N
    Biomed Chromatogr; 2012 Nov; 26(11):1457-60. PubMed ID: 22987619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.