These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29780193)

  • 61. Study design, originality and overall consistency influence acceptance or rejection of manuscripts submitted to the Journal.
    Turcotte C; Drolet P; Girard M
    Can J Anaesth; 2004; 51(6):549-56. PubMed ID: 15197116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Predictors of publication: characteristics of submitted manuscripts associated with acceptance at major biomedical journals.
    Lee KP; Boyd EA; Holroyd-Leduc JM; Bacchetti P; Bero LA
    Med J Aust; 2006 Jun; 184(12):621-6. PubMed ID: 16803442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Publication efficiency among the higher impact factor nursing journals in 2009: a retrospective analysis.
    Palese A; Coletti S; Dante A
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2013 Apr; 50(4):543-51. PubMed ID: 23010133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Reliability of editors' subjective quality ratings of peer reviews of manuscripts.
    Callaham ML; Baxt WG; Waeckerle JF; Wears RL
    JAMA; 1998 Jul; 280(3):229-31. PubMed ID: 9676664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. The fate of manuscripts rejected by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American Volume).
    Okike K; Kocher MS; Nwachukwu BU; Mehlman CT; Heckman JD; Bhandari M
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Sep; 94(17):e130. PubMed ID: 22992859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Variability of Reviewers' Comments in the Peer Review Process for Orthopaedic Research.
    Iantorno SE; Andras LM; Skaggs DL
    Spine Deform; 2016 Jul; 4(4):268-271. PubMed ID: 27927515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Gender and Geographic Origin as Determinants of Manuscript Publication Outcomes: JBMR® Bibliometric Analysis from 2017 to 2019.
    Rivadeneira F; Loder RT; McGuire AC; Chitwood JR; Duffy K; Civitelli R; Kacena MA; Westendorf JJ
    J Bone Miner Res; 2022 Dec; 37(12):2420-2434. PubMed ID: 36063372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Peer review in the Croatian Medical Journal from 1992 to 1996.
    Marusić A; Mestrović T; Petrovecki M; Marusić M
    Croat Med J; 1998 Mar; 39(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 9475799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. [The evaluation of medical research].
    Malacara JM
    Rev Invest Clin; 1997; 49(4):303-8. PubMed ID: 9707997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. "It is becoming increasingly difficult to find reviewers"-myths and facts about peer review.
    Zupanc GKH
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2024 Jan; 210(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 37318565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Statistical significance and publication reporting bias in abstracts of reproductive medicine studies.
    Feng Q; Mol BW; Ioannidis JPA; Li W
    Hum Reprod; 2023 Nov; 39(3):548-558. PubMed ID: 38015794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Steps to Getting Your Manuscript Published in a High-Quality Medical Journal.
    Balch CM; McMasters KM; Klimberg VS; Pawlik TM; Posner MC; Roh M; Tanabe KK; Whippen D; Ikoma N
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Apr; 25(4):850-855. PubMed ID: 29349528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Peer review in a small and a big medical journal: case study of the Croatian Medical Journal and the Lancet.
    Marusić A; Lukić IK; Marusić M; McNamee D; Sharp D; Horton R
    Croat Med J; 2002 Jun; 43(3):286-9. PubMed ID: 12035133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. The criteria used by editors of scientific dental journals in the assessment of manuscripts submitted for publication.
    Radford DR; Smillie L; Wilson RF; Grace AM
    Br Dent J; 1999 Oct; 187(7):376-9. PubMed ID: 10581814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Publishing a manuscript: analysis of reviewed manuscripts with discussion. Part I.
    Frank ED
    Radiol Technol; 1988; 60(2):125-9. PubMed ID: 3194505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Ultimate publication rate of unpublished manuscripts listed on radiology residency applications at one institution.
    Grimm LJ; Maxfield CM
    Acad Med; 2013 Nov; 88(11):1719-22. PubMed ID: 24072127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Influence of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Author Sex and Manuscript Acceptance Rates among Pulmonary and Critical Care Journals.
    Gershengorn HB; Vranas KC; Ouyang D; Cheng S; Rogers AJ; Schweiger L; Cooke CR; Slatore CG
    Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2023 Feb; 20(2):215-225. PubMed ID: 35588358
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals.
    Turner L; Shamseer L; Altman DG; Weeks L; Peters J; Kober T; Dias S; Schulz KF; Plint AC; Moher D
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Nov; 11(11):MR000030. PubMed ID: 23152285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Factors influencing editors' decision on acceptance or rejection of manuscripts: the authors' perspective.
    Shakiba B; Salmasian H; Yousefi-Nooraie R; Rohanizadegan M
    Arch Iran Med; 2008 May; 11(3):257-62. PubMed ID: 18426315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Do author-suggested reviewers rate submissions more favorably than editor-suggested reviewers? A study on atmospheric chemistry and physics.
    Bornmann L; Daniel HD
    PLoS One; 2010 Oct; 5(10):e13345. PubMed ID: 20976226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.