These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29780962)

  • 1. Challenging aspects of contemporary cochlear implant electrode array design.
    Mistrík P; Jolly C; Sieber D; Hochmair I
    World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Dec; 3(4):192-199. PubMed ID: 29780962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An overview of cochlear implant electrode array designs.
    Dhanasingh A; Jolly C
    Hear Res; 2017 Dec; 356():93-103. PubMed ID: 29102129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intraindividual comparison of psychophysical parameters between perimodiolar and lateral-type electrode arrays in patients with bilateral cochlear implants.
    Jeong J; Kim M; Heo JH; Bang MY; Bae MR; Kim J; Choi JY
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Feb; 36(2):228-34. PubMed ID: 25473955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Scalar Translocation Comparison Between Lateral Wall and Perimodiolar Cochlear Implant Arrays - A Meta-Analysis.
    Jwair S; Prins A; Wegner I; Stokroos RJ; Versnel H; Thomeer HGXM
    Laryngoscope; 2021 Jun; 131(6):1358-1368. PubMed ID: 33159469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Place-versus-Pitch Mismatch between a Perimodiolar and Lateral Wall Cochlear Implant Electrode Array in Patients with Single-Sided Deafness and a Cochlear Implant.
    Peters JPM; Bennink E; van Zanten GA
    Audiol Neurootol; 2019; 24(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 30995658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Frequency-to-Place Mismatch: Characterizing Variability and the Influence on Speech Perception Outcomes in Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Canfarotta MW; Dillon MT; Buss E; Pillsbury HC; Brown KD; O'Connell BP
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1349-1361. PubMed ID: 32205726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of electrode position in the human cochlea using various perimodiolar electrode arrays.
    Tykocinski M; Cohen LT; Pyman BC; Roland T; Treaba C; Palamara J; Dahm MC; Shepherd RK; Xu J; Cowan RS; Cohen NL; Clark GM
    Am J Otol; 2000 Mar; 21(2):205-11. PubMed ID: 10733185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Relationship Between Insertion Angles, Default Frequency Allocations, and Spiral Ganglion Place Pitch in Cochlear Implants.
    Landsberger DM; Svrakic M; Roland JT; Svirsky M
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(5):e207-13. PubMed ID: 25860624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The distance from the modiolus of perimodiolar electrode arrays of cochlear implants.
    Perényi Á; Nagy R; Dimák B; Csanády M; Jóri J; Kiss JG; Rovó L
    Orv Hetil; 2019 Aug; 160(31):1216-1222. PubMed ID: 31352808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Considerations and Rationale for Cochlear Implant Electrode Design - Past, Present and Future.
    Risi F
    J Int Adv Otol; 2018 Dec; 14(3):382-391. PubMed ID: 30644379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Correlation Between Cochlear Length, Insertion Angle, and Tonotopic Mismatch for MED-EL FLEX28 Electrode Arrays.
    Dutrieux N; Quatre R; Péan V; Schmerber S
    Otol Neurotol; 2022 Jan; 43(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 34538852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of Cochlear Implant Electrode Array Design on Electrophysiological and Psychophysical Measures: Lateral Wall versus Perimodiolar Types.
    Lee JY; Hong SH; Moon IJ; Kim EY; Baek E; Seol HY; Kang S
    J Audiol Otol; 2019 Jul; 23(3):145-152. PubMed ID: 31315391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detection of modiolar proximity through bipolar impedance measurements.
    Pile J; Sweeney AD; Kumar S; Simaan N; Wanna GB
    Laryngoscope; 2017 Jun; 127(6):1413-1419. PubMed ID: 27557458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A temporal bone study of insertion trauma and intracochlear position of cochlear implant electrodes. II: Comparison of Spiral Clarion and HiFocus II electrodes.
    Wardrop P; Whinney D; Rebscher SJ; Luxford W; Leake P
    Hear Res; 2005 May; 203(1-2):68-79. PubMed ID: 15855031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of cochlear tonotopy on electrically evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs).
    Christov F; Gluth MB; Hans S; Lang S; Arweiler-Harbeck D
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2019 Jan; 139(1):22-26. PubMed ID: 30652918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Combining perimodiolar electrode placement and atraumatic insertion properties in cochlear implantation -- fact or fantasy?
    Adunka OF; Pillsbury HC; Kiefer J
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2006 May; 126(5):475-82. PubMed ID: 16698696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Effect of Round Window vs Cochleostomy Surgical Approaches on Cochlear Implant Electrode Position: A Flat-Panel Computed Tomography Study.
    Jiam NT; Jiradejvong P; Pearl MS; Limb CJ
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2016 Sep; 142(9):873-80. PubMed ID: 27355198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Potential benefits from deeply inserted cochlear implant electrodes.
    Boyd PJ
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):411-27. PubMed ID: 21248642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An In-Vitro Insertion-Force Study of Magnetically Guided Lateral-Wall Cochlear-Implant Electrode Arrays.
    Leon L; Warren FM; Abbott JJ
    Otol Neurotol; 2018 Feb; 39(2):e63-e73. PubMed ID: 29315180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Survey of the American Neurotology Society on Cochlear Implantation: Part 2, Surgical and Device-Related Practice Patterns.
    Carlson ML; O'Connell BP; Lohse CM; Driscoll CL; Sweeney AD
    Otol Neurotol; 2018 Jan; 39(1):e20-e27. PubMed ID: 29210943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.