166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29781228)
1. The role of tomosynthesis in intraoperative specimen evaluation.
Polat YD; Taşkın F; Çildağ MB; Tanyeri A; Soyder A; Ergin F
Breast J; 2018 Nov; 24(6):992-996. PubMed ID: 29781228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: comparison of diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis, digital mammography, and ultrasonography.
Su X; Lin Q; Cui C; Xu W; Wei Z; Fei J; Li L
Breast Cancer; 2017 Jul; 24(4):562-570. PubMed ID: 27837442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Digital mammography versus digital breast tomosynthesis for detection of breast cancer in the intraoperative specimen during breast-conserving surgery.
Urano M; Shiraki N; Kawai T; Goto T; Endo Y; Yoshimoto N; Toyama T; Shibamoto Y
Breast Cancer; 2016 Sep; 23(5):706-11. PubMed ID: 26198975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: comparison of the accuracy of lesion measurement and characterization using specimens.
Seo N; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Cha JH; Kim H; Moon JH; Gong G; Ahn SH; Son BH
Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):661-7. PubMed ID: 24005560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Review and management of breast lesions detected with breast tomosynthesis but not visible on mammography and ultrasonography.
Taskin F; Durum Y; Soyder A; Unsal A
Acta Radiol; 2017 Dec; 58(12):1442-1447. PubMed ID: 28530138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): initial experience in a clinical setting.
Skaane P; Gullien R; Bjørndal H; Eben EB; Ekseth U; Haakenaasen U; Jahr G; Jebsen IN; Krager M
Acta Radiol; 2012 Jun; 53(5):524-9. PubMed ID: 22593120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography-Which modality provides more accurate prediction of margin status in specimen radiography?
Amer HA; Schmitzberger F; Ingold-Heppner B; Kussmaul J; El Tohamy MF; Tantawy HI; Hamm B; Makowski M; Fallenberg EM
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Aug; 93():258-264. PubMed ID: 28668424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic performance of tomosynthesis and breast ultrasonography in women with dense breasts: a prospective comparison study.
Kim WH; Chang JM; Lee J; Chu AJ; Seo M; Gweon HM; Koo HR; Lee SH; Cho N; Bae MS; Shin SU; Song SE; Moon WK
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Feb; 162(1):85-94. PubMed ID: 28083822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic accuracy of resection margin in specimen radiography: digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography.
Romanucci G; Mercogliano S; Carucci E; Cina A; Zantedeschi E; Caneva A; Benassuti C; Fornasa F
Radiol Med; 2021 Jun; 126(6):768-773. PubMed ID: 33625658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Detection of breast cancer presenting as a mass in women with dense breasts - digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography.
Babkina TM; Dykan IM; Gurando AV; Suleimenova DM; Kozarenko TM; Bozhok YM; Stuley VA
Exp Oncol; 2020 Sep; 42(3):215-219. PubMed ID: 32996743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Digital breast tomosynthesis and breast ultrasound: Additional roles in dense breasts with category 0 at conventional digital mammography.
Lee WK; Chung J; Cha ES; Lee JE; Kim JH
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jan; 85(1):291-296. PubMed ID: 26499000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of tomosynthesis plus digital mammography and digital mammography alone for breast cancer screening.
Haas BM; Kalra V; Geisel J; Raghu M; Durand M; Philpotts LE
Radiology; 2013 Dec; 269(3):694-700. PubMed ID: 23901124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: A New Diagnostic Method for Mass-Like Lesions in Dense Breasts.
Bian T; Lin Q; Cui C; Li L; Qi C; Fei J; Su X
Breast J; 2016 Sep; 22(5):535-40. PubMed ID: 27296324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Agreement between digital breast tomosynthesis and pathologic tumour size for staging breast cancer, and comparison with standard mammography.
Marinovich ML; Bernardi D; Macaskill P; Ventriglia A; Sabatino V; Houssami N
Breast; 2019 Feb; 43():59-66. PubMed ID: 30466027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of synthetic mammography, reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis, and digital mammography: evaluation of lesion conspicuity and BI-RADS assessment categories.
Mariscotti G; Durando M; Houssami N; Fasciano M; Tagliafico A; Bosco D; Casella C; Bogetti C; Bergamasco L; Fonio P; Gandini G
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Dec; 166(3):765-773. PubMed ID: 28819781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Value of Additional Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Preoperative Staging of Breast Cancer in Dense Breasts.
Krammer J; Stepniewski K; Kaiser CG; Brade J; Riffel P; Schoenberg SO; Wasser K
Anticancer Res; 2017 Sep; 37(9):5255-5261. PubMed ID: 28870962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Overview of digital breast tomosynthesis: Clinical cases, benefits and disadvantages.
Nguyen T; Levy G; Poncelet E; Le Thanh T; Prolongeau JF; Phalippou J; Massoni F; Laurent N
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2015 Sep; 96(9):843-59. PubMed ID: 26275829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intraoperative digital breast tomosynthesis using a dedicated device is more accurate than standard intraoperative mammography for identifying positive margins.
Garlaschi A; Fregatti P; Oddone C; Friedman D; Houssami N; Calabrese M; Tagliafico AS
Clin Radiol; 2019 Dec; 74(12):974.e1-974.e6. PubMed ID: 31521327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 2D mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis, and ultrasound: which should be used for the different breast densities in breast cancer screening?
Starikov A; Drotman M; Hentel K; Katzen J; Min RJ; Arleo EK
Clin Imaging; 2016; 40(1):68-71. PubMed ID: 26549432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
