These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29781637)

  • 1. A comparison of several approaches for controlling measurement error in small samples.
    Savalei V
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Jun; 24(3):352-370. PubMed ID: 29781637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Alleviating estimation problems in small sample structural equation modeling-A comparison of constrained maximum likelihood, Bayesian estimation, and fixed reliability approaches.
    Ulitzsch E; Lüdtke O; Robitzsch A
    Psychol Methods; 2023 Jun; 28(3):527-557. PubMed ID: 34928675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Two-stage path analysis with definition variables: An alternative framework to account for measurement error.
    Lai MHC; Hsiao YY
    Psychol Methods; 2022 Aug; 27(4):568-588. PubMed ID: 34881957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Autoregressive mediation models using composite scores and latent variables: Comparisons and recommendations.
    Zhang Q; Yang Y
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Aug; 25(4):472-495. PubMed ID: 32271042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An improved test of latent-variable model misspecification in structural measurement error models for group testing data.
    Huang X
    Stat Med; 2009 Nov; 28(26):3316-27. PubMed ID: 19691036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modeling congruence in organizational research with latent moderated structural equations.
    Su R; Zhang Q; Liu Y; Tay L
    J Appl Psychol; 2019 Nov; 104(11):1404-1433. PubMed ID: 31045381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A tutorial on the meta-analytic structural equation modeling of reliability coefficients.
    Scherer R; Teo T
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Dec; 25(6):747-775. PubMed ID: 32134314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Causal effect analysis in nonrandomized data with latent variables and categorical indicators: The implementation and benefits of EffectLiteR.
    Sengewald MA; Mayer A
    Psychol Methods; 2024 Apr; 29(2):287-307. PubMed ID: 35549317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing estimators for latent interaction models under structural and distributional misspecifications.
    Brandt H; Umbach N; Kelava A; Bollen KA
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Jun; 25(3):321-345. PubMed ID: 31670539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A tutorial on assessing statistical power and determining sample size for structural equation models.
    Jobst LJ; Bader M; Moshagen M
    Psychol Methods; 2023 Feb; 28(1):207-221. PubMed ID: 34672644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Corrected goodness-of-fit test in covariance structure analysis.
    Hayakawa K
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Jun; 24(3):371-389. PubMed ID: 29771549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accounting for measurement error in human life history trade-offs using structural equation modeling.
    Helle S
    Am J Hum Biol; 2018 Mar; 30(2):. PubMed ID: 29130592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A cautionary note on the finite sample behavior of maximal reliability.
    Aguirre-Urreta MI; Rönkkö M; McIntosh CN
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Apr; 24(2):236-252. PubMed ID: 30138004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Time to criterion latent growth models.
    Johnson TL; Hancock GR
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Dec; 24(6):690-707. PubMed ID: 30998039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using generalizability theory with continuous latent response variables.
    Vispoel WP; Morris CA; Kilinc M
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Apr; 24(2):153-178. PubMed ID: 30080056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A structural equation modeling approach for modeling variability as a latent variable.
    Feng Y; Hancock GR
    Psychol Methods; 2024 Apr; 29(2):262-286. PubMed ID: 35404625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A multiple imputation score test for model modification in structural equation models.
    Mansolf M; Jorgensen TD; Enders CK
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Aug; 25(4):393-411. PubMed ID: 31621350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Henseler-Ogasawara specification of composites in structural equation modeling: A tutorial.
    Schuberth F
    Psychol Methods; 2023 Aug; 28(4):843-859. PubMed ID: 34914475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reliability and validity of structural equation modeling applied to neuroimaging data: a simulation study.
    Boucard A; Marchand A; Noguès X
    J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Nov; 166(2):278-92. PubMed ID: 17825426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. R-squared change in structural equation models with latent variables and missing data.
    Hayes T
    Behav Res Methods; 2021 Oct; 53(5):2127-2157. PubMed ID: 33782902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.