334 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29782139)
21. Pathologic maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with programmed embryo transfer.
Conrad KP; von Versen-Höynck F; Baker VL
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2024 Apr; 41(4):821-842. PubMed ID: 38536594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Higher estradiol levels are associated with lower neonatal birthweight after fresh and frozen embryo transfers. A cohort study of 3631 singleton IVF pregnancies.
Tarlatzi T; Venetis C; Sassi A; Devreker F; Englert Y; Delbaere A
Gynecol Endocrinol; 2021 Jul; 37(7):618-623. PubMed ID: 33016794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Large baby syndrome in singletons born after frozen embryo transfer (FET): is it due to maternal factors or the cryotechnique?
Pinborg A; Henningsen AA; Loft A; Malchau SS; Forman J; Andersen AN
Hum Reprod; 2014 Mar; 29(3):618-27. PubMed ID: 24413766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Physical health of singleton children born after frozen embryo transfer using slow freezing: a 3-year follow-up study.
Pelkonen S; Gissler M; Koivurova S; Lehtinen S; Martikainen H; Hartikainen AL; Tiitinen A
Hum Reprod; 2015 Oct; 30(10):2411-8. PubMed ID: 26293785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of perinatal outcomes following fresh and frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer.
Pereira N; Petrini AC; Lekovich JP; Schattman GL; Rosenwaks Z
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Oct; 135(1):96-100. PubMed ID: 27388034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Fresh versus frozen embryo transfer for full-term singleton birth: a retrospective cohort study.
Zhang J; Du M; Li Z; Wang L; Hu J; Zhao B; Feng Y; Chen X; Sun L
J Ovarian Res; 2018 Jul; 11(1):59. PubMed ID: 30012201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Influence of cryopreservation on perinatal outcome after blastocyst- vs cleavage-stage embryo transfer: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Alviggi C; Conforti A; Carbone IF; Borrelli R; de Placido G; Guerriero S
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 51(1):54-63. PubMed ID: 29077229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Lower risk of adverse perinatal outcomes in natural versus artificial frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Moreno-Sepulveda J; Espinós JJ; Checa MA
Reprod Biomed Online; 2021 Jun; 42(6):1131-1145. PubMed ID: 33903031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. High FSH dosing is associated with reduced live birth rate in fresh but not subsequent frozen embryo transfers.
Munch EM; Sparks AE; Zimmerman MB; Van Voorhis BJ; Duran EH
Hum Reprod; 2017 Jul; 32(7):1402-1409. PubMed ID: 28472321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Hatching status before embryo transfer is not correlated with implantation rate in chromosomally screened blastocysts.
Rodriguez-Purata J; Gingold J; Lee J; Whitehouse M; Slifkin R; Briton-Jones C; Copperman A; Sandler B
Hum Reprod; 2016 Nov; 31(11):2458-2470. PubMed ID: 27619770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Pregnancy-related complications and perinatal outcomes resulting from transfer of cryopreserved versus fresh embryos in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis.
Sha T; Yin X; Cheng W; Massey IY
Fertil Steril; 2018 Feb; 109(2):330-342.e9. PubMed ID: 29331236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Which one has a better obstetric and perinatal outcome in singleton pregnancy, IVF/ICSI or FET?: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Zhao J; Xu B; Zhang Q; Li YP
Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2016 Aug; 14(1):51. PubMed ID: 27577996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Freeze-all policy: is it time for that?
Roque M
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2015 Feb; 32(2):171-6. PubMed ID: 25428436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Slightly lower incidence of ectopic pregnancies in frozen embryo transfer cycles versus fresh in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycles: a retrospective cohort study.
Decleer W; Osmanagaoglu K; Meganck G; Devroey P
Fertil Steril; 2014 Jan; 101(1):162-5. PubMed ID: 24238273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Fresh embryo transfer versus frozen embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Roque M; Lattes K; Serra S; Solà I; Geber S; Carreras R; Checa MA
Fertil Steril; 2013 Jan; 99(1):156-162. PubMed ID: 23040524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes after transfer of vitrified early cleavage embryos.
Liu SY; Teng B; Fu J; Li X; Zheng Y; Sun XX
Hum Reprod; 2013 Aug; 28(8):2093-100. PubMed ID: 23569081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Factors affecting the outcome of frozen-thawed embryo transfer.
Veleva Z; Orava M; Nuojua-Huttunen S; Tapanainen JS; Martikainen H
Hum Reprod; 2013 Sep; 28(9):2425-31. PubMed ID: 23756705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes in 1,136 singleton pregnancies conceived after programmed frozen embryo transfer (FET) compared with natural cycle FET.
Asserhøj LL; Spangmose AL; Aaris Henningsen AK; Clausen TD; Ziebe S; Jensen RB; Pinborg A
Fertil Steril; 2021 Apr; 115(4):947-956. PubMed ID: 33461756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Embryo stage of development is not decisive for reproductive outcomes in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles.
Carvalho BR; Barbosa MW; Bonesi H; Gomes DB; Cabral ÍO; Barbosa AC; Silva AA; Iglesias JR; Nakagawa HM
JBRA Assist Reprod; 2017 Feb; 21(1):23-26. PubMed ID: 28333028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Perinatal outcome of children born after frozen and fresh embryo transfer: the Finnish cohort study 1995-2006.
Pelkonen S; Koivunen R; Gissler M; Nuojua-Huttunen S; Suikkari AM; Hydén-Granskog C; Martikainen H; Tiitinen A; Hartikainen AL
Hum Reprod; 2010 Apr; 25(4):914-23. PubMed ID: 20124395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
