484 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29782442)
1. Informational Masking Effects on Neural Encoding of Stimulus Onset and Acoustic Change.
Niemczak CE; Vander Werff KR
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):156-167. PubMed ID: 29782442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Release from perceptual masking for children and adults: benefit of a carrier phrase.
Bonino AY; Leibold LJ; Buss E
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):3-14. PubMed ID: 22836239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cross-modal Informational Masking of Lipreading by Babble.
Myerson J; Spehar B; Tye-Murray N; Van Engen K; Hale S; Sommers MS
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jan; 78(1):346-54. PubMed ID: 26474981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cortical encoding of signals in noise: effects of stimulus type and recording paradigm.
Billings CJ; Bennett KO; Molis MR; Leek MR
Ear Hear; 2011 Feb; 32(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 20890206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effects of broadband noise masking on cortical event-related potentials to speech sounds /ba/ and /da/.
Whiting KA; Martin BA; Stapells DR
Ear Hear; 1998 Jun; 19(3):218-31. PubMed ID: 9657596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effects of decreased audibility produced by high-pass noise masking on cortical event-related potentials to speech sounds/ba/and/da.
Martin BA; Sigal A; Kurtzberg D; Stapells DR
J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Mar; 101(3):1585-99. PubMed ID: 9069627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Temporal effects in simultaneous masking by vowel and consonant-vowel maskers.
Bacon SP; Blake PE
J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Mar; 33(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 2314083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effects of speech masking on neural tracking of acoustic and semantic features of natural speech.
Yasmin S; Irsik VC; Johnsrude IS; Herrmann B
Neuropsychologia; 2023 Jul; 186():108584. PubMed ID: 37169066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Electrophysiological Measures of Listening-in-Noise With and Without Remote Microphone System Use in Autistic and Non-Autistic Youth.
Key AP; Thompson EC; Benítez-Barrera C; Feldman JI; Woynaroski T; Picou E; Tharpe AM
Ear Hear; 2024 May-Jun 01; 45(3):710-720. PubMed ID: 38273435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Speech competition effects on synthetic stop-vowel perception by normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
Gordon-Salant SM; Wightman FL
J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 May; 73(5):1756-65. PubMed ID: 6223058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Relative contributions of acoustic temporal fine structure and envelope cues for lexical tone perception in noise.
Qi B; Mao Y; Liu J; Liu B; Xu L
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 May; 141(5):3022. PubMed ID: 28599529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cortical evoked response to gaps in noise: within-channel and across-channel conditions.
Lister JJ; Maxfield ND; Pitt GJ
Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):862-78. PubMed ID: 17982372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Exploring the Differences Between an Immature and a Mature Human Auditory System Through Auditory Late Responses in Quiet and in Noise.
Duquette-Laplante F; Jutras B; Néron N; Fortin S; Koravand A
Neuroscience; 2024 May; 545():171-184. PubMed ID: 38513763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Auditory Sensory Gating: Effects of Noise.
Cheng FY; Campbell J; Liu C
Biology (Basel); 2024 Jun; 13(6):. PubMed ID: 38927323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cortical evoked response to acoustic change within a syllable.
Ostroff JM; Martin BA; Boothroyd A
Ear Hear; 1998 Aug; 19(4):290-7. PubMed ID: 9728724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cortical signal-in-noise coding varies by noise type, signal-to-noise ratio, age, and hearing status.
Maamor N; Billings CJ
Neurosci Lett; 2017 Jan; 636():258-264. PubMed ID: 27838448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Activation of the human auditory cortex by speech sounds.
Hari R
Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1991; 491():132-7; discussion 138. PubMed ID: 1814144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Babble and random-noise masking of speech in high and low context cue conditions.
Lewis HD; Benignus VA; Muller KE; Malott CM; Barton CN
J Speech Hear Res; 1988 Mar; 31(1):108-14. PubMed ID: 3352248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The advantage of knowing the talker.
Souza P; Gehani N; Wright R; McCloy D
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Sep; 24(8):689-700. PubMed ID: 24131605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pre- and post-target cortical processes predict speech-in-noise performance.
Kim S; Schwalje AT; Liu AS; Gander PE; McMurray B; Griffiths TD; Choi I
Neuroimage; 2021 Mar; 228():117699. PubMed ID: 33387631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
