415 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29782445)
1. Comparing Two Hearing Aid Fitting Algorithms for Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users.
Vroegop JL; Homans NC; van der Schroeff MP; Goedegebure A
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):98-106. PubMed ID: 29782445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparing the Effect of Different Hearing Aid Fitting Methods in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users.
Vroegop JL; Dingemanse JG; van der Schroeff MP; Goedegebure A
Am J Audiol; 2019 Mar; 28(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 30383163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of a novel bimodal fitting formula in Advanced Bionics cochlear implant recipients.
Warren SE; Noelle Dunbar M; Bosworth C; Agrawal S
Cochlear Implants Int; 2020 Nov; 21(6):323-337. PubMed ID: 32664814
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Fitting recommendations and clinical benefit associated with use of the NAL-NL2 hearing-aid prescription in Nucleus cochlear implant recipients.
English R; Plant K; Maciejczyk M; Cowan R
Int J Audiol; 2016; 55 Suppl 2():S45-50. PubMed ID: 26853233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of Modified Hearing Aid Fittings on Loudness and Tone Quality for Different Acoustic Scenes.
Moore BC; Baer T; Ives DT; Marriage J; Salorio-Corbetto M
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(4):483-91. PubMed ID: 26928003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of bimodal benefit for the use of DSL v5.0 and NAL-NL2 in cochlear implant listeners.
Digeser FM; Engler M; Hoppe U
Int J Audiol; 2020 May; 59(5):383-391. PubMed ID: 31809219
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Integrated Bimodal Fitting for Unilateral CI Users with Residual Contralateral Hearing.
Auletta G; Franzè A; Laria C; Piccolo C; Papa C; Riccardi P; Pisani D; Sarnelli A; Del Vecchio V; Malesci R; Marciano E
Audiol Res; 2021 May; 11(2):200-206. PubMed ID: 34065802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. How to Optimally Fit a Hearing Aid for Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users: A Systematic Review.
Vroegop JL; Goedegebure A; van der Schroeff MP
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(6):1039-1045. PubMed ID: 29688963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Matching Automatic Gain Control Across Devices in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users.
Veugen LC; Chalupper J; Snik AF; Opstal AJ; Mens LH
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):260-70. PubMed ID: 26656192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An initial-fit comparison of two generic hearing aid prescriptive methods (NAL-NL2 and CAM2) to individuals having mild to moderately severe high-frequency hearing loss.
Johnson EE
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Feb; 24(2):138-50. PubMed ID: 23357807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Binaural benefits for adults who use hearing aids and cochlear implants in opposite ears.
Ching TY; Incerti P; Hill M
Ear Hear; 2004 Feb; 25(1):9-21. PubMed ID: 14770014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the CAM2 and NAL-NL2 hearing aid fitting methods.
Moore BC; Sęk A
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):83-95. PubMed ID: 22878351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of hearing aid frequency response fittings in pediatric and young adult bimodal recipients.
Davidson LS; Firszt JB; Brenner C; Cadieux JH
J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Apr; 26(4):393-407. PubMed ID: 25879243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The contribution of a frequency-compression hearing aid to contralateral cochlear implant performance.
Perreau AE; Bentler RA; Tyler RS
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Feb; 24(2):105-20. PubMed ID: 23357804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A "Goldilocks" Approach to Hearing Aid Self-Fitting: Ear-Canal Output and Speech Intelligibility Index.
Mackersie C; Boothroyd A; Lithgow A
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):107-115. PubMed ID: 29894379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Functional outcomes for speech-in-noise intelligibility of NAL-NL2 and DSL v.5 prescriptive fitting rules in hearing aid users.
Portelli D; Loteta S; Ciodaro F; Salvago P; Galletti C; Freni L; Alberti G
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Jun; 281(6):3227-3235. PubMed ID: 38546852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sound Localization and Speech Perception in Noise of Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients: Bimodal Fitting Versus Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
Choi JE; Moon IJ; Kim EY; Park HS; Kim BK; Chung WH; Cho YS; Brown CJ; Hong SH
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):426-440. PubMed ID: 28085740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of an Automated Hearing Aid Fitting Using Real Ear Measures Embedded in a Manufacturer Fitting Software.
Brockmeyer A; Voss A; Wick CC; Durakovic N; Valente M
J Am Acad Audiol; 2021 Mar; 32(3):157-163. PubMed ID: 34062602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of extreme adaptive frequency compression in bimodal listeners on sound localization and speech perception.
Veugen LCE; Chalupper J; Mens LHM; Snik AFM; van Opstal AJ
Cochlear Implants Int; 2017 Sep; 18(5):266-277. PubMed ID: 28726592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
