These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

415 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29782445)

  • 1. Comparing Two Hearing Aid Fitting Algorithms for Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users.
    Vroegop JL; Homans NC; van der Schroeff MP; Goedegebure A
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):98-106. PubMed ID: 29782445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing the Effect of Different Hearing Aid Fitting Methods in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users.
    Vroegop JL; Dingemanse JG; van der Schroeff MP; Goedegebure A
    Am J Audiol; 2019 Mar; 28(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 30383163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of a novel bimodal fitting formula in Advanced Bionics cochlear implant recipients.
    Warren SE; Noelle Dunbar M; Bosworth C; Agrawal S
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2020 Nov; 21(6):323-337. PubMed ID: 32664814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fitting recommendations and clinical benefit associated with use of the NAL-NL2 hearing-aid prescription in Nucleus cochlear implant recipients.
    English R; Plant K; Maciejczyk M; Cowan R
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55 Suppl 2():S45-50. PubMed ID: 26853233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of Modified Hearing Aid Fittings on Loudness and Tone Quality for Different Acoustic Scenes.
    Moore BC; Baer T; Ives DT; Marriage J; Salorio-Corbetto M
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(4):483-91. PubMed ID: 26928003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of bimodal benefit for the use of DSL v5.0 and NAL-NL2 in cochlear implant listeners.
    Digeser FM; Engler M; Hoppe U
    Int J Audiol; 2020 May; 59(5):383-391. PubMed ID: 31809219
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Integrated Bimodal Fitting for Unilateral CI Users with Residual Contralateral Hearing.
    Auletta G; Franzè A; Laria C; Piccolo C; Papa C; Riccardi P; Pisani D; Sarnelli A; Del Vecchio V; Malesci R; Marciano E
    Audiol Res; 2021 May; 11(2):200-206. PubMed ID: 34065802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How to Optimally Fit a Hearing Aid for Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users: A Systematic Review.
    Vroegop JL; Goedegebure A; van der Schroeff MP
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(6):1039-1045. PubMed ID: 29688963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Matching Automatic Gain Control Across Devices in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users.
    Veugen LC; Chalupper J; Snik AF; Opstal AJ; Mens LH
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):260-70. PubMed ID: 26656192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An initial-fit comparison of two generic hearing aid prescriptive methods (NAL-NL2 and CAM2) to individuals having mild to moderately severe high-frequency hearing loss.
    Johnson EE
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Feb; 24(2):138-50. PubMed ID: 23357807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Binaural benefits for adults who use hearing aids and cochlear implants in opposite ears.
    Ching TY; Incerti P; Hill M
    Ear Hear; 2004 Feb; 25(1):9-21. PubMed ID: 14770014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the CAM2 and NAL-NL2 hearing aid fitting methods.
    Moore BC; Sęk A
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):83-95. PubMed ID: 22878351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of hearing aid frequency response fittings in pediatric and young adult bimodal recipients.
    Davidson LS; Firszt JB; Brenner C; Cadieux JH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Apr; 26(4):393-407. PubMed ID: 25879243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The contribution of a frequency-compression hearing aid to contralateral cochlear implant performance.
    Perreau AE; Bentler RA; Tyler RS
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Feb; 24(2):105-20. PubMed ID: 23357804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A "Goldilocks" Approach to Hearing Aid Self-Fitting: Ear-Canal Output and Speech Intelligibility Index.
    Mackersie C; Boothroyd A; Lithgow A
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):107-115. PubMed ID: 29894379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Functional outcomes for speech-in-noise intelligibility of NAL-NL2 and DSL v.5 prescriptive fitting rules in hearing aid users.
    Portelli D; Loteta S; Ciodaro F; Salvago P; Galletti C; Freni L; Alberti G
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Jun; 281(6):3227-3235. PubMed ID: 38546852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sound Localization and Speech Perception in Noise of Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients: Bimodal Fitting Versus Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
    Choi JE; Moon IJ; Kim EY; Park HS; Kim BK; Chung WH; Cho YS; Brown CJ; Hong SH
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):426-440. PubMed ID: 28085740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of an Automated Hearing Aid Fitting Using Real Ear Measures Embedded in a Manufacturer Fitting Software.
    Brockmeyer A; Voss A; Wick CC; Durakovic N; Valente M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2021 Mar; 32(3):157-163. PubMed ID: 34062602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of extreme adaptive frequency compression in bimodal listeners on sound localization and speech perception.
    Veugen LCE; Chalupper J; Mens LHM; Snik AFM; van Opstal AJ
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2017 Sep; 18(5):266-277. PubMed ID: 28726592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.