416 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29782445)
21. Differences in Word and Phoneme Recognition in Quiet, Sentence Recognition in Noise, and Subjective Outcomes between Manufacturer First-Fit and Hearing Aids Programmed to NAL-NL2 Using Real-Ear Measures.
Valente M; Oeding K; Brockmeyer A; Smith S; Kallogjeri D
J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Sep; 29(8):706-721. PubMed ID: 30222541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Frequency-dependent loudness balancing in bimodal cochlear implant users.
Veugen LC; Chalupper J; Snik AF; van Opstal AJ; Mens LH
Acta Otolaryngol; 2016 Aug; 136(8):775-81. PubMed ID: 26986743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A comparison of gain for adults from generic hearing aid prescriptive methods: impacts on predicted loudness, frequency bandwidth, and speech intelligibility.
Johnson EE; Dillon H
J Am Acad Audiol; 2011; 22(7):441-59. PubMed ID: 21993050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Should children who use cochlear implants wear hearing aids in the opposite ear?
Ching TY; Psarros C; Hill M; Dillon H; Incerti P
Ear Hear; 2001 Oct; 22(5):365-80. PubMed ID: 11605945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Implications of high-frequency cochlear dead regions for fitting hearing aids to adults with mild to moderately severe hearing loss.
Cox RM; Johnson JA; Alexander GC
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(5):573-87. PubMed ID: 22555183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effect of hearing aid bandwidth on speech recognition performance of listeners using a cochlear implant and contralateral hearing aid (bimodal hearing).
Neuman AC; Svirsky MA
Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):553-61. PubMed ID: 23632973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Temporal Fine Structure Processing, Pitch, and Speech Perception in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients.
Dincer D'Alessandro H; Ballantyne D; Boyle PJ; De Seta E; DeVincentiis M; Mancini P
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(4):679-686. PubMed ID: 29194080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. NAL-NL2 empirical adjustments.
Keidser G; Dillon H; Carter L; O'Brien A
Trends Amplif; 2012 Dec; 16(4):211-23. PubMed ID: 23203416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Extending the audiogram with loudness growth: The complementarity of electric and acoustic hearing in bimodal patients.
Lambriks L; van Hoof M; George E; Devocht E
PLoS One; 2023; 18(4):e0277161. PubMed ID: 37079550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparing loudness normalization (IHAFF) with speech intelligibility maximization (NAL-NL1) when implemented in a two-channel device.
Keidser G; Grant F
Ear Hear; 2001 Dec; 22(6):501-15. PubMed ID: 11770672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Benefit of Bimodal Stimulation with Cochlear Implant and Hearing Aid in Elderly Patients].
Hinder D; Linder TE; Schlegel-Wagner C; Candreia C
Laryngorhinootologie; 2017 Jul; 96(7):456-460. PubMed ID: 28470659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Optimal gain control step sizes for bimodal stimulation.
Spirrov D; van Dijk B; Francart T
Int J Audiol; 2018 Mar; 57(3):184-193. PubMed ID: 29172895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Reduction in High-Frequency Hearing Aid Gain Can Improve Performance in Patients With Contralateral Cochlear Implant: A Pilot Study.
Messersmith JJ; Jorgensen LE; Hagg JA
Am J Audiol; 2015 Dec; 24(4):462-8. PubMed ID: 26650016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Quality of life in bimodal hearing users (unilateral cochlear implants and contralateral hearing aids).
Farinetti A; Roman S; Mancini J; Baumstarck-Barrau K; Meller R; Lavieille JP; Triglia JM
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Nov; 272(11):3209-15. PubMed ID: 25373837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Evaluation of the bimodal benefit in a large cohort of cochlear implant subjects using a contralateral hearing aid.
Illg A; Bojanowicz M; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz T; Büchner A
Otol Neurotol; 2014 Oct; 35(9):e240-4. PubMed ID: 25058838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Cochlear implant and hearing aid: a new approach to optimizing the fitting in this bimodal situation.
Keilmann AM; Bohnert AM; Gosepath J; Mann WJ
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Dec; 266(12):1879-84. PubMed ID: 19466442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Is normal or less than normal overall loudness preferred by first-time hearing aid users?
Smeds K
Ear Hear; 2004 Apr; 25(2):159-72. PubMed ID: 15064661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Should a hearing aid in the contralateral ear be recommended for children with a unilateral cochlear implant?
Beijen JW; Mylanus EA; Leeuw AR; Snik AF
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2008 Jun; 117(6):397-403. PubMed ID: 18646435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears.
Mok M; Grayden D; Dowell RC; Lawrence D
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):338-51. PubMed ID: 16671848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Contralateral hearing aid use in adult cochlear implant recipients: retrospective analysis of auditory outcomes.
Mertens G; Andries E; Clement C; Cochet E; Hofkens-Van den Brandt A; Jacquemin L; Joossen I; Vermeersch H; Lammers MJ; Van Rompaey V; Vanderveken O
Int J Audiol; 2024 Jul; 63(7):543-550. PubMed ID: 37229750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
