229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29784438)
1. Accuracy and Reproducibility of Sonoelastography for the Assessment of Fibroids and Adenomyosis, with Magnetic Resonance Imaging as Reference Standard.
Stoelinga B; Hehenkamp WJK; Nieuwenhuis LL; Conijn MMA; van Waesberghe JHTM; Brölmann HAM; Huirne JAF
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2018 Aug; 44(8):1654-1663. PubMed ID: 29784438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Real-time elastography for assessment of uterine disorders.
Stoelinga B; Hehenkamp WJ; Brölmann HA; Huirne JA
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Feb; 43(2):218-26. PubMed ID: 23703939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transvaginal Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography for the Evaluation of Benign Uterine Pathologies: A Prospective Pilot Study.
Zhang M; Wasnik AP; Masch WR; Rubin JM; Carlos RC; Quint EH; Maturen KE
J Ultrasound Med; 2019 Jan; 38(1):149-155. PubMed ID: 29732594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Importance of Transvaginal Elastography in the Diagnosis of Uterine Fibroids and Adenomyosis.
Frank ML; Schäfer SD; Möllers M; Falkenberg MK; Braun J; Möllmann U; Strube F; Fruscalzo A; Amler S; Klockenbusch W; Schmitz R
Ultraschall Med; 2016 Aug; 37(4):373-8. PubMed ID: 26274380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of pelvic magnetic resonance imaging findings in the indication of uterine artery embolization in the treatment of myoma.
Brito Pires NM; Godoi ET; Oliveira DC; Brandão SC; Abath CC; Pires P; Araujo Júnior E
Ginekol Pol; 2017; 88(3):129-133. PubMed ID: 28397200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Uterine fibroids: correlations between MRI appearance and stiffness via magnetic resonance elastography.
Jondal DE; Wang J; Chen J; Gorny KR; Felmlee J; Hesly G; Laughlin-Tommaso S; Stewart EA; Ehman R; Woodrum DA
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2018 Jun; 43(6):1456-1463. PubMed ID: 28952003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. High-intensity focused ultrasound therapy.
Cheung VYT
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2018 Jan; 46():74-83. PubMed ID: 29074037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. MR reproducibility in the assessment of uterine fibroids for patients scheduled for uterine artery embolization.
Volkers NA; Hehenkamp WJ; Spijkerboer AM; Moolhuijzen AD; Birnie E; Ankum WM; Reekers JA
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2008; 31(2):260-8. PubMed ID: 18057985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [A STUDY OF UTERINE HEMODYNAMICS USING THREE-DIMENSIONAL POWER DOPPLER SONOGRAPHY IN PATIENTS WITH ADENOMYOSIS].
Yakovenko K; Tamm T; Yakovenko Y
Georgian Med News; 2018 Dec; (285):21-27. PubMed ID: 30702064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Assessment of Uterine Fibroids: A Feasibility Study.
Stoelinga B; Dooper AMC; Juffermans LJM; Postema AW; Wijkstra H; Brölmann HAM; Huirne JAF
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2018 Aug; 44(8):1901-1909. PubMed ID: 29735316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ulipristal acetate therapy increases ultrasound features of adenomyosis: a good treatment given in an erroneous diagnosis of uterine fibroids.
Conway F; Morosetti G; Camilli S; Martire FG; Sorrenti G; Piccione E; Zupi E; Exacoustos C
Gynecol Endocrinol; 2019 Mar; 35(3):207-210. PubMed ID: 30382803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Safety and Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Treatment for Uterine Fibroids and Adenomyosis.
Lee JS; Hong GY; Lee KH; Song JH; Kim TE
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Dec; 45(12):3214-3221. PubMed ID: 31563479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Non-invasive Differentiation of Endometrial Adenocarcinoma from Benign Lesions in the Uterus by Utilization of Amide Proton Transfer-Weighted MRI.
Li Y; Lin CY; Qi YF; Wang XQ; Chen B; Zhou HL; Ren J; Yang JJ; Xiang Y; He YL; Xue HD; Jin ZY
Mol Imaging Biol; 2021 Jun; 23(3):446-455. PubMed ID: 33185840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Terms, definitions and measurements to describe sonographic features of myometrium and uterine masses: a consensus opinion from the Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) group.
Van den Bosch T; Dueholm M; Leone FP; Valentin L; Rasmussen CK; Votino A; Van Schoubroeck D; Landolfo C; Installé AJ; Guerriero S; Exacoustos C; Gordts S; Benacerraf B; D'Hooghe T; De Moor B; Brölmann H; Goldstein S; Epstein E; Bourne T; Timmerman D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Sep; 46(3):284-98. PubMed ID: 25652685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Which imaging method is better for the differentiation of adenomyosis and uterine fibroids?
Görgülü FF; Okçu NT
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2021 May; 50(5):102002. PubMed ID: 33242677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Imaging techniques for evaluation of uterine myomas.
Testa AC; Di Legge A; Bonatti M; Manfredi R; Scambia G
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2016 Jul; 34():37-53. PubMed ID: 26803557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Inferior Mesenteric Artery Collaterals to the Uterus during Uterine Artery Embolization: Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Clinical Outcomes.
Chang S; Lee MS; Kim MD; Yoon CJ; Jung DC; Lee M; Park SI; Won JY; Lee DY
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2013 Sep; 24(9):1353-60. PubMed ID: 23891048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Value of in vitro acoustic radiation force impulse application on uterine adenomyosis.
Bildaci TB; Cevik H; Yilmaz B; Desteli GA
J Med Ultrason (2001); 2018 Jul; 45(3):425-430. PubMed ID: 29177930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnosing adenomyosis: an integrated clinical and imaging approach.
Chapron C; Vannuccini S; Santulli P; Abrão MS; Carmona F; Fraser IS; Gordts S; Guo SW; Just PA; Noël JC; Pistofidis G; Van den Bosch T; Petraglia F
Hum Reprod Update; 2020 Apr; 26(3):392-411. PubMed ID: 32097456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) of adenomyosis and fibroids of the uterus.
Jha RC; Zanello PA; Ascher SM; Rajan S
Abdom Imaging; 2014 Jun; 39(3):562-9. PubMed ID: 24531353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
