These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29785685)
1. Network meta-analysis: an introduction for pharmacists. Xu Y; Amiche MA; Tadrous M Int J Clin Pharm; 2018 Oct; 40(5):942-947. PubMed ID: 29785685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interpreting indirect treatment comparisons and network meta-analysis for health-care decision making: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: part 1. Jansen JP; Fleurence R; Devine B; Itzler R; Barrett A; Hawkins N; Lee K; Boersma C; Annemans L; Cappelleri JC Value Health; 2011 Jun; 14(4):417-28. PubMed ID: 21669366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review. Zeng X; Zhang Y; Kwong JS; Zhang C; Li S; Sun F; Niu Y; Du L J Evid Based Med; 2015 Feb; 8(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 25594108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Conducting indirect-treatment-comparison and network-meta-analysis studies: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: part 2. Hoaglin DC; Hawkins N; Jansen JP; Scott DA; Itzler R; Cappelleri JC; Boersma C; Thompson D; Larholt KM; Diaz M; Barrett A Value Health; 2011 Jun; 14(4):429-37. PubMed ID: 21669367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions to prevent delirium in critically ill patients: a protocol for a systematic review incorporating network meta-analyses. Burry LD; Hutton B; Guenette M; Williamson D; Mehta S; Egerod I; Kanji S; Adhikari NK; Moher D; Martin CM; Rose L Syst Rev; 2016 Sep; 5(1):153. PubMed ID: 27609018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of pharmacists as immunizers on vaccination rates: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Isenor JE; Edwards NT; Alia TA; Slayter KL; MacDougall DM; McNeil SA; Bowles SK Vaccine; 2016 Nov; 34(47):5708-5723. PubMed ID: 27765379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Introduction to network meta-analysis for evidence synthesis. González-Xuriguera CG; Vergara-Merino L; Garegnani L; Ortiz-Muñoz L; Meza N Medwave; 2021 Jul; 21(6):e8315. PubMed ID: 34292922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Indirect treatment comparison/network meta-analysis study questionnaire to assess relevance and credibility to inform health care decision making: an ISPOR-AMCP-NPC Good Practice Task Force report. Jansen JP; Trikalinos T; Cappelleri JC; Daw J; Andes S; Eldessouki R; Salanti G Value Health; 2014 Mar; 17(2):157-73. PubMed ID: 24636374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Planning a future randomized clinical trial based on a network of relevant past trials. Salanti G; Nikolakopoulou A; Sutton AJ; Reichenbach S; Trelle S; Naci H; Egger M Trials; 2018 Jul; 19(1):365. PubMed ID: 29996869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. On the need for increased rigour and care in the conduct and interpretation of network meta-analyses in drug development. Carroll K; Hemmings R Pharm Stat; 2016; 15(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 26732132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Network meta-analysis for evidence synthesis: what is it and why is it posed to dominate cardiovascular decision making? Biondi-Zoccai G; Abbate A; Benedetto U; Palmerini T; D'Ascenzo F; Frati G Int J Cardiol; 2015 Mar; 182():309-14. PubMed ID: 25585376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Uncertainty in Treatment Rankings: Reanalysis of Network Meta-analyses of Randomized Trials. Trinquart L; Attiche N; Bafeta A; Porcher R; Ravaud P Ann Intern Med; 2016 May; 164(10):666-73. PubMed ID: 27089537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Network Meta-analysis to Synthesize Evidence for Decision Making in Cardiovascular Research. Roever L; Biondi-Zoccai G Arq Bras Cardiol; 2016 Apr; 106(4):333-7. PubMed ID: 27142793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An evaluation of the comparative effectiveness of geriatrician-led comprehensive geriatric assessment for improving patient and healthcare system outcomes for older adults: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Soobiah C; Daly C; Blondal E; Ewusie J; Ho J; Elliott MJ; Yue R; Holroyd-Leduc J; Liu B; Marr S; Basran J; Tricco AC; Hamid J; Straus SE Syst Rev; 2017 Mar; 6(1):65. PubMed ID: 28340600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Combining randomized and non-randomized evidence in network meta-analysis. Efthimiou O; Mavridis D; Debray TP; Samara M; Belger M; Siontis GC; Leucht S; Salanti G; Stat Med; 2017 Apr; 36(8):1210-1226. PubMed ID: 28083901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Network meta-analysis: mixed and indirect treatment comparisons. a new method to the service of clinical epidemiology and public health]. García-Perdomo HA; Tobías A Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica; 2016 Mar; 33(1):149-53. PubMed ID: 27384635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Network meta-analysis: a technique to gather evidence from direct and indirect comparisons. Tonin FS; Rotta I; Mendes AM; Pontarolo R Pharm Pract (Granada); 2017; 15(1):943. PubMed ID: 28503228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evidence synthesis for decision making 1: introduction. Dias S; Welton NJ; Sutton AJ; Ades AE Med Decis Making; 2013 Jul; 33(5):597-606. PubMed ID: 23804506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative effectiveness of different wound dressings for patients with partial-thickness burns: study protocol of a systematic review and a Bayesian framework network meta-analysis. Jiang Q; Chen ZH; Wang SB; Chen XD BMJ Open; 2017 Mar; 7(3):e013289. PubMed ID: 28336737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]