These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29785973)

  • 41. The effects of digital noise reduction on the acceptance of background noise.
    Mueller HG; Weber J; Hornsby BW
    Trends Amplif; 2006 Jun; 10(2):83-93. PubMed ID: 16959732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Comparing Loudness Tolerance and Acceptable Noise Level in Listeners With Hearing Loss.
    Franklin CA; White LJ; Franklin TC; Livengood LG
    Percept Mot Skills; 2016 Aug; 123(1):109-20. PubMed ID: 27324167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Acceptance of background noise, working memory capacity, and auditory evoked potentials in subjects with normal hearing.
    Brännström KJ; Zunic E; Borovac A; Ibertsson T
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(7):542-52. PubMed ID: 22992261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The relationship between hearing aid frequency response and acceptable noise level in patients with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Jalilvand H; Pourbakht A; Jalaee S
    Adv Biomed Res; 2015; 4():256. PubMed ID: 26918238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Acceptable noise level: reliability measures and comparison to preference for background sounds.
    Freyaldenhoven MC; Smiley DF; Muenchen RA; Konrad TN
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2006 Oct; 17(9):640-8. PubMed ID: 17039766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The Effect of Digital Noise Reduction on Annoyance and Speech Perception in Low and High Acceptable Noise Level Groups.
    Shetty HN; Nanjundaswamy NB
    Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Oct; 23(4):e433-e439. PubMed ID: 31649764
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The acceptable noise level: the effect of repeated measurements.
    Brännström KJ; Holm L; Kastberg T; Olsen SØ
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Jan; 53(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 24003981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The Relationship between Personality Type and Acceptable Noise Levels: A Pilot Study.
    Franklin C; Johnson LV; White L; Franklin C; Smith-Olinde L
    ISRN Otolaryngol; 2013; 2013():902532. PubMed ID: 24349796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Predicting three-month and 12-month post-fitting real-world hearing-aid outcome using pre-fitting acceptable noise level (ANL).
    Wu YH; Ho HC; Hsiao SH; Brummet RB; Chipara O
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55(5):285-94. PubMed ID: 26878163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The effect of repeated measurements and working memory on the most comfortable level in the ANL test.
    Brännström KJ; Olsen SØ; Holm L; Kastberg T; Ibertsson T
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Nov; 53(11):787-95. PubMed ID: 25156233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Most comfortable listening levels, background noise levels, and acceptable noise levels for children and adults with normal hearing.
    Moore R; Gordon-Hickey S; Jones A
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 May; 22(5):286-93. PubMed ID: 21756844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The Effects of Extended Input Dynamic Range on Laboratory and Field-Trial Evaluations in Adult Hearing Aid Users.
    Plyler PN; Easterday M; Behrens T
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019; 30(7):634-648. PubMed ID: 30403956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Evaluation of a transient noise reduction strategy for hearing AIDS.
    Liu H; Zhang H; Bentler RA; Han D; Zhang L
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Sep; 23(8):606-15. PubMed ID: 22967735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Measurement and prediction of the acceptable noise level for single-microphone noise reduction algorithms.
    Fredelake S; Holube I; Schlueter A; Hansen M
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Apr; 51(4):299-308. PubMed ID: 22316007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The impact of listening condition on background noise acceptance for young adults with normal hearing.
    Gordon-Hickey S; Moore RE; Estis JM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Oct; 55(5):1356-72. PubMed ID: 22411277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Improving Acceptance of Background Noise with Sound Enrichment.
    Gordon-Hickey S; Davis S; Lewis L; Van Haneghan J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Jul; 31(7):513-520. PubMed ID: 32119816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [The application of mandarin acceptable noise level and COS in hearing aid fitting for presbyacusis].
    Yang JY; Zhang H; Chen J; Chen XQ; Wang S; Li YL; Wu YJ; Kong Y
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Dec; 30(23):1850-1853;1858. PubMed ID: 29798011
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Acceptable noise level and psychophysical masking.
    Rishiq DA; Harkrider AW; Hedrick MS
    Am J Audiol; 2012 Dec; 21(2):199-205. PubMed ID: 22718324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The effect of speech presentation level on acceptance of background noise in listeners with normal hearing.
    Franklin CA; Thelin JW; Nabelek AK; Burchfield SB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2006 Feb; 17(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 16640066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Effects of Modified Hearing Aid Fittings on Loudness and Tone Quality for Different Acoustic Scenes.
    Moore BC; Baer T; Ives DT; Marriage J; Salorio-Corbetto M
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(4):483-91. PubMed ID: 26928003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.