These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29785976)

  • 1. The study of attenuation levels and the comfort of earplugs.
    Samelli AG; Gomes RF; Chammas TV; Silva BG; Moreira RR; Fiorini AC
    Noise Health; 2018; 20(94):112-119. PubMed ID: 29785976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hearing protection field attenuation estimation systems and associated training for reducing workers' exposure to noise.
    Morata TC; Gong W; Tikka C; Samelli AG; Verbeek JH
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2024 May; 5(5):CD015066. PubMed ID: 38757544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Individual Fit Testing of Hearing-Protection Devices Based on Microphones in Real Ears among Workers in Industries with High-Noise-Level Manufacturing.
    Chiu CC; Wan TJ
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 May; 17(9):. PubMed ID: 32384734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Variability of real-world hearing protector attenuation measurements.
    Neitzel R; Somers S; Seixas N
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2006 Oct; 50(7):679-91. PubMed ID: 16782739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Measurement and evaluation of personal attenuation rating before and after the training of the noise-exposed workers wearing foam earplugs].
    Liu J; Wang X; Zhang R; Bao YH; Gu KF; Pan LP
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2024 Aug; 42(8):589-593. PubMed ID: 39223044
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Training in the proper use of earplugs: An objective evaluation.
    Takada MM; Rocha CH; Neves-Lobo IF; Moreira RR; Samelli AG
    Work; 2020; 65(2):401-407. PubMed ID: 32007983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hearing Protector Attenuation and Noise Exposure Among Metal Manufacturing Workers.
    Sayler SK; Rabinowitz PM; Galusha D; Sun K; Neitzel RL
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(3):680-689. PubMed ID: 30157082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Verification of Attenuation for Premolded Hearing Protection Devices Designed for Music.
    Zaccardi TA; Portnuff CD; Le Prell CG
    Med Probl Perform Art; 2022 Jun; 37(2):78-88. PubMed ID: 35637560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of hearing protection device effectiveness for musicians.
    Crawford K; Willenbring K; Nothwehr F; Fleckenstein S; Anthony TR
    Int J Audiol; 2023 Mar; 62(3):238-244. PubMed ID: 35143376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Consistency of attenuation across multiple fittings of custom and non-custom earplugs.
    Tufts JB; Jahn KN; Byram JP
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2013 Jun; 57(5):571-80. PubMed ID: 23267007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The role of information and training for workers on the correct use of earplugs in assessing real noise attenuation with E-A-RfitTM system].
    Cassano F; Aloise I; Labianca G; Gaccione V; Mazzotta C; Cardascia F; Garavaglia M; Germano C; Dentamaro A; Di Lorenzo L
    Med Lav; 2015 Jul; 106(4):284-93. PubMed ID: 26154471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Longitudinal evaluation of a hearing protector fit training program.
    Assunção CHC; Trabanco JC; Gomes RF; Moreira RR; Samelli AG
    Med Lav; 2019 Aug; 110(4):304-311. PubMed ID: 31475692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The efficacy of earplugs at a major hazard facility.
    Lee KH; Benke G; Mckenzie D
    Phys Eng Sci Med; 2022 Mar; 45(1):107-114. PubMed ID: 35023076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relationship between comfort and attenuation measurements for two types of earplugs.
    Byrne DC; Davis RR; Shaw PB; Specht BM; Holland AN
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):86-92. PubMed ID: 21368433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A controlled investigation of in-field attenuation performance of selected insert, earmuff, and canal cap hearing protectors.
    Park MY; Casali JG
    Hum Factors; 1991 Dec; 33(6):693-714. PubMed ID: 1800294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measuring earplug noise attenuation: A comparison of laboratory and field methods.
    Karch SJ; Federman J; Ginsberg JT; Qureshi I
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2024 Jan; 21(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 37843505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comfort of earplugs: results of a field survey based on the COPROD questionnaire.
    Terroir J; Perrin N; Wild P
    Ergonomics; 2022 Sep; 65(9):1173-1193. PubMed ID: 34641760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improved hearing protector attenuation through the use of a lubricant.
    Ryan TJ; Meier RS; Tatarka A
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2017 Nov; 14(11):931-937. PubMed ID: 28763289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Soft tissue conduction as a possible contributor to the limited attenuation provided by hearing protection devices.
    Chordekar S; Adelman C; Sohmer H; Kishon-Rabin L
    Noise Health; 2016; 18(84):274-279. PubMed ID: 27762257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development and validation of a field microphone-in-real-ear approach for measuring hearing protector attenuation.
    Berger EH; Voix J; Kieper RW; Le Cocq C
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):163-75. PubMed ID: 21368442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.