These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

418 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29786129)

  • 1. Surgeon Variability and Factors Predicting for Reoperation Following Breast-Conserving Surgery.
    Valero MG; Mallory MA; Losk K; Tukenmez M; Hwang J; Camuso K; Bunnell C; King T; Golshan M
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Sep; 25(9):2573-2578. PubMed ID: 29786129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Surgeon Volume, Patient Age, and Tumor-Related Factors Influence the Need for Re-Excision After Breast-Conserving Surgery.
    Hughes L; Hamm J; McGahan C; Baliski C
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Dec; 23(Suppl 5):656-664. PubMed ID: 27718033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Early Adoption of the SSO-ASTRO Consensus Guidelines on Margins for Breast-Conserving Surgery with Whole-Breast Irradiation in Stage I and II Invasive Breast Cancer: Initial Experience from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.
    Rosenberger LH; Mamtani A; Fuzesi S; Stempel M; Eaton A; Morrow M; Gemignani ML
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Oct; 23(10):3239-46. PubMed ID: 27411549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predictors of Surgical Margin Following Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Large Population-Based Cohort Study.
    van Deurzen CH
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Dec; 23(Suppl 5):627-633. PubMed ID: 27590331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Short term safety of oncoplastic breast conserving surgery for larger tumors.
    Wijgman DJ; Ten Wolde B; van Groesen NR; Keemers-Gels ME; van den Wildenberg FJ; Strobbe LJ
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Apr; 43(4):665-671. PubMed ID: 28041648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Factors influencing reoperation following breast-conserving surgery.
    Philpott A; Wong J; Elder K; Gorelik A; Mann GB; Skandarajah A
    ANZ J Surg; 2018 Sep; 88(9):922-927. PubMed ID: 29763991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. External validation and modification of nomogram for predicting positive resection margins before breast conserving surgery.
    Jung JJ; Kang E; Kim EK; Kim SM; Jang M; La Yun B; Park SY; Shin HC
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2020 Sep; 183(2):373-380. PubMed ID: 32647937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Low re-excision rate for positive margins in patients treated with ultrasound-guided breast-conserving surgery.
    Yu CC; Chiang KC; Kuo WL; Shen SC; Lo YF; Chen SC
    Breast; 2013 Oct; 22(5):698-702. PubMed ID: 23333255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Implications of New Lumpectomy Margin Guidelines for Breast-Conserving Surgery: Changes in Reexcision Rates and Predicted Rates of Residual Tumor.
    Merrill AL; Coopey SB; Tang R; McEvoy MP; Specht MC; Hughes KS; Gadd MA; Smith BL
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Mar; 23(3):729-34. PubMed ID: 26467458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reoperation Rates in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ vs Invasive Breast Cancer After Wire-Guided Breast-Conserving Surgery.
    Langhans L; Jensen MB; Talman MM; Vejborg I; Kroman N; Tvedskov TF
    JAMA Surg; 2017 Apr; 152(4):378-384. PubMed ID: 28002557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does intra-operative margin assessment improve margin status and re-excision rates? A population-based analysis of outcomes in breast-conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ.
    Laws A; Brar MS; Bouchard-Fortier A; Leong B; Quan ML
    J Surg Oncol; 2018 Dec; 118(7):1205-1211. PubMed ID: 30293241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Influence of Repeat Surgery and Residual Disease on Recurrence After Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group Study.
    Bodilsen A; Bjerre K; Offersen BV; Vahl P; Ejlertsen B; Overgaard J; Christiansen P
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Dec; 22 Suppl 3():S476-85. PubMed ID: 26178760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinicopathologic factors related to surgical margin involvement, reoperation, and residual cancer in primary operable breast cancer - An analysis of 2050 patients.
    Lai HW; Huang RH; Wu YT; Chen CJ; Chen ST; Lin YJ; Chen DR; Lee CW; Wu HK; Lin HY; Kuo SJ
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2018 Nov; 44(11):1725-1735. PubMed ID: 30120037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intraoperative margin assessment and re-excision rate in breast conserving surgery.
    Fleming FJ; Hill AD; Mc Dermott EW; O'Doherty A; O'Higgins NJ; Quinn CM
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2004 Apr; 30(3):233-7. PubMed ID: 15028301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Imaging of lumpectomy surface with large field-of-view confocal laser scanning microscope for intraoperative margin assessment - POLARHIS study.
    Sandor MF; Schwalbach B; Hofmann V; Istrate SE; Schuller Z; Ionescu E; Heimann S; Ragazzi M; Lux MP
    Breast; 2022 Dec; 66():118-125. PubMed ID: 36240525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Resection margins and local recurrences of impalpable breast cancer: Comparison between radioguided occult lesion localization (ROLL) and radioactive seed localization (RSL).
    Niinikoski L; Hukkinen K; Leidenius MHK; Vaara P; Voynov A; Heikkilä P; Mattson J; Meretoja TJ
    Breast; 2019 Oct; 47():93-101. PubMed ID: 31362135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Current margin practice and effect on re-excision rates following the publication of the SSO-ASTRO consensus and ABS consensus guidelines: a national prospective study of 2858 women undergoing breast-conserving therapy in the UK and Ireland.
    Tang SS; Kaptanis S; Haddow JB; Mondani G; Elsberger B; Tasoulis MK; Obondo C; Johns N; Ismail W; Syed A; Kissias P; Venn M; Sundaramoorthy S; Irwin G; Sami AS; Elfadl D; Baggaley A; Remoundos DD; Langlands F; Charalampoudis P; Barber Z; Hamilton-Burke WLS; Khan A; Sirianni C; Merker LAG; Saha S; Lane RA; Chopra S; Dupré S; Manning AT; St John ER; Musbahi A; Dlamini N; McArdle CL; Wright C; Murphy JO; Aggarwal R; Dordea M; Bosch K; Egbeare D; Osman H; Tayeh S; Razi F; Iqbal J; Ledwidge SFC; Albert V; Masannat Y
    Eur J Cancer; 2017 Oct; 84():315-324. PubMed ID: 28865259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tumor margins that lead to reoperation in breast cancer: A retrospective register study of 4,489 patients.
    Lepomäki M; Karhunen-Enckell U; Tuominen J; Kronqvist P; Oksala N; Murtola T; Roine A
    J Surg Oncol; 2022 Mar; 125(4):577-588. PubMed ID: 34779520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Factors Associated with Reoperation in Breast-Conserving Surgery for Cancer: A Prospective Study of American Society of Breast Surgeon Members.
    Landercasper J; Borgert AJ; Fayanju OM; Cody H; Feldman S; Greenberg C; Linebarger J; Pockaj B; Wilke L
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 Oct; 26(10):3321-3336. PubMed ID: 31342360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery Reduces Mastectomy and Postoperative Re-excision Rates.
    Crown A; Wechter DG; Grumley JW
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Oct; 22(10):3363-8. PubMed ID: 26208579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.