BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

415 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29786129)

  • 1. Surgeon Variability and Factors Predicting for Reoperation Following Breast-Conserving Surgery.
    Valero MG; Mallory MA; Losk K; Tukenmez M; Hwang J; Camuso K; Bunnell C; King T; Golshan M
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Sep; 25(9):2573-2578. PubMed ID: 29786129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Surgeon Volume, Patient Age, and Tumor-Related Factors Influence the Need for Re-Excision After Breast-Conserving Surgery.
    Hughes L; Hamm J; McGahan C; Baliski C
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Dec; 23(Suppl 5):656-664. PubMed ID: 27718033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Early Adoption of the SSO-ASTRO Consensus Guidelines on Margins for Breast-Conserving Surgery with Whole-Breast Irradiation in Stage I and II Invasive Breast Cancer: Initial Experience from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.
    Rosenberger LH; Mamtani A; Fuzesi S; Stempel M; Eaton A; Morrow M; Gemignani ML
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Oct; 23(10):3239-46. PubMed ID: 27411549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predictors of Surgical Margin Following Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Large Population-Based Cohort Study.
    van Deurzen CH
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Dec; 23(Suppl 5):627-633. PubMed ID: 27590331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Short term safety of oncoplastic breast conserving surgery for larger tumors.
    Wijgman DJ; Ten Wolde B; van Groesen NR; Keemers-Gels ME; van den Wildenberg FJ; Strobbe LJ
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Apr; 43(4):665-671. PubMed ID: 28041648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Factors influencing reoperation following breast-conserving surgery.
    Philpott A; Wong J; Elder K; Gorelik A; Mann GB; Skandarajah A
    ANZ J Surg; 2018 Sep; 88(9):922-927. PubMed ID: 29763991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. External validation and modification of nomogram for predicting positive resection margins before breast conserving surgery.
    Jung JJ; Kang E; Kim EK; Kim SM; Jang M; La Yun B; Park SY; Shin HC
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2020 Sep; 183(2):373-380. PubMed ID: 32647937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Low re-excision rate for positive margins in patients treated with ultrasound-guided breast-conserving surgery.
    Yu CC; Chiang KC; Kuo WL; Shen SC; Lo YF; Chen SC
    Breast; 2013 Oct; 22(5):698-702. PubMed ID: 23333255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Implications of New Lumpectomy Margin Guidelines for Breast-Conserving Surgery: Changes in Reexcision Rates and Predicted Rates of Residual Tumor.
    Merrill AL; Coopey SB; Tang R; McEvoy MP; Specht MC; Hughes KS; Gadd MA; Smith BL
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Mar; 23(3):729-34. PubMed ID: 26467458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reoperation Rates in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ vs Invasive Breast Cancer After Wire-Guided Breast-Conserving Surgery.
    Langhans L; Jensen MB; Talman MM; Vejborg I; Kroman N; Tvedskov TF
    JAMA Surg; 2017 Apr; 152(4):378-384. PubMed ID: 28002557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does intra-operative margin assessment improve margin status and re-excision rates? A population-based analysis of outcomes in breast-conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ.
    Laws A; Brar MS; Bouchard-Fortier A; Leong B; Quan ML
    J Surg Oncol; 2018 Dec; 118(7):1205-1211. PubMed ID: 30293241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Influence of Repeat Surgery and Residual Disease on Recurrence After Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group Study.
    Bodilsen A; Bjerre K; Offersen BV; Vahl P; Ejlertsen B; Overgaard J; Christiansen P
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Dec; 22 Suppl 3():S476-85. PubMed ID: 26178760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinicopathologic factors related to surgical margin involvement, reoperation, and residual cancer in primary operable breast cancer - An analysis of 2050 patients.
    Lai HW; Huang RH; Wu YT; Chen CJ; Chen ST; Lin YJ; Chen DR; Lee CW; Wu HK; Lin HY; Kuo SJ
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2018 Nov; 44(11):1725-1735. PubMed ID: 30120037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intraoperative margin assessment and re-excision rate in breast conserving surgery.
    Fleming FJ; Hill AD; Mc Dermott EW; O'Doherty A; O'Higgins NJ; Quinn CM
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2004 Apr; 30(3):233-7. PubMed ID: 15028301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Resection margins and local recurrences of impalpable breast cancer: Comparison between radioguided occult lesion localization (ROLL) and radioactive seed localization (RSL).
    Niinikoski L; Hukkinen K; Leidenius MHK; Vaara P; Voynov A; Heikkilä P; Mattson J; Meretoja TJ
    Breast; 2019 Oct; 47():93-101. PubMed ID: 31362135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Current margin practice and effect on re-excision rates following the publication of the SSO-ASTRO consensus and ABS consensus guidelines: a national prospective study of 2858 women undergoing breast-conserving therapy in the UK and Ireland.
    Tang SS; Kaptanis S; Haddow JB; Mondani G; Elsberger B; Tasoulis MK; Obondo C; Johns N; Ismail W; Syed A; Kissias P; Venn M; Sundaramoorthy S; Irwin G; Sami AS; Elfadl D; Baggaley A; Remoundos DD; Langlands F; Charalampoudis P; Barber Z; Hamilton-Burke WLS; Khan A; Sirianni C; Merker LAG; Saha S; Lane RA; Chopra S; Dupré S; Manning AT; St John ER; Musbahi A; Dlamini N; McArdle CL; Wright C; Murphy JO; Aggarwal R; Dordea M; Bosch K; Egbeare D; Osman H; Tayeh S; Razi F; Iqbal J; Ledwidge SFC; Albert V; Masannat Y
    Eur J Cancer; 2017 Oct; 84():315-324. PubMed ID: 28865259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tumor margins that lead to reoperation in breast cancer: A retrospective register study of 4,489 patients.
    Lepomäki M; Karhunen-Enckell U; Tuominen J; Kronqvist P; Oksala N; Murtola T; Roine A
    J Surg Oncol; 2022 Mar; 125(4):577-588. PubMed ID: 34779520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Factors Associated with Reoperation in Breast-Conserving Surgery for Cancer: A Prospective Study of American Society of Breast Surgeon Members.
    Landercasper J; Borgert AJ; Fayanju OM; Cody H; Feldman S; Greenberg C; Linebarger J; Pockaj B; Wilke L
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 Oct; 26(10):3321-3336. PubMed ID: 31342360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery Reduces Mastectomy and Postoperative Re-excision Rates.
    Crown A; Wechter DG; Grumley JW
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Oct; 22(10):3363-8. PubMed ID: 26208579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Effect of Lumpectomy and Cavity Shave Margin Status on Recurrence and Survival in Breast-Conserving Surgery.
    Abdelsattar JM; Afridi FG; Dai Z; Yousaf N; Seldomridge A; Battin AO; Wen S; Gray D; Marsh JW; Cowher MS; Partin JF; Hazard-Jenkins H; Lupinacci K
    Am Surg; 2023 Mar; 89(3):424-433. PubMed ID: 34196595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.