BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2978625)

  • 1. Cuspal reinforcement in primary teeth: an in vitro comparison of three restorative materials.
    Donly KJ; Wild T; Jensen ME
    Pediatr Dent; 1988 Jun; 10(2):102-4. PubMed ID: 2978625
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fracture resistance of teeth with Class 2 silver amalgam, posterior composite, and glass cermet restorations.
    Jagadish S; Yogesh BG
    Oper Dent; 1990; 15(2):42-7. PubMed ID: 2374743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Alternatives to silver amalgam and resin composite in pediatric dentistry.
    Croll TP
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Nov; 29(11):697-703. PubMed ID: 10200719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical evaluation of glass ionomer-silver cermet restorations in primary molars: one year results.
    Hung TW; Richardson AS
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1990 Mar; 56(3):239-40. PubMed ID: 2110027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of materials for the buildup of severely damaged teeth.
    Huget EF; Murray GA
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 1991 Jan; 71(1):38-40. PubMed ID: 1900088
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of glass cermet cement and amalgam restorations in primary molars.
    Hickel R; Voss A
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1990; 57(3):184-8. PubMed ID: 2111833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Class II Tunnel restorations of glass-ionomer-silver-Cermet cement and composite].
    Croll TP
    Quintessenz; 1989 Sep; 40(9):1577-88. PubMed ID: 2517954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Glass ionomer-silver cermet bonded composite resin Class II tunnel restorations.
    Croll TP
    Quintessence Int; 1988 Aug; 19(8):533-9. PubMed ID: 2978627
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Ketac silver: in vitro experience and clinical results].
    Dallari A; Rovatti L; Sciacca S
    Attual Dent; 1988 Dec; 4(41-42):10-1, 13-6, 18-9 passim. PubMed ID: 2978693
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Enamel remineralization on teeth adjacent to Class II glass ionomer restorations.
    Segura A; Donly KJ; Stratmann RG
    Am J Dent; 1997 Oct; 10(5):247-50. PubMed ID: 9522700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Occlusal glass ionomer cermet, resin sandwich and amalgam restorations: a 2-year clinical study.
    Lidums A; Wilkie R; Smales R
    Am J Dent; 1993 Aug; 6(4):185-8. PubMed ID: 7803005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical and histologic observations of glass ionomer-silver cermet restorations in six human primary molars.
    Croll TP; Riesenberger RE; Miller AS
    Quintessence Int; 1988 Dec; 19(12):911-9. PubMed ID: 2978277
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Glass ionomer-silver cermet Class II tunnel-restorations for primary molars.
    Croll TP
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1988; 55(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 2968382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Class II glass ionomer-silver restorations in primary molars.
    Stratmann RG; Berg JH; Donly KJ
    Quintessence Int; 1989 Jan; 20(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 2503851
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Secondary caries formation in vitro around fluoride-releasing restorations.
    Dionysopoulos P; Kotsanos N; Koliniotou-Koubia ; Papagodiannis Y
    Oper Dent; 1994; 19(5):183-8. PubMed ID: 8700758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Cermet cements for milk tooth fillings. Preliminary results].
    Hickel R; Petschelt A; Voss A
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1989 Jun; 44(6):444-5. PubMed ID: 2517110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Comparative investigation of compressive resistance of glass-cermet cements used as a core material in post-core systems].
    Ersoy E; Cetiner S; Koçak F
    Ankara Univ Hekim Fak Derg; 1989 Sep; 16(3):413-7. PubMed ID: 2518746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the flexural strength of six reinforced restorative materials.
    Cohen BI; Volovich Y; Musikant BL; Deutsch AS
    Gen Dent; 2001; 49(5):484-8. PubMed ID: 12017792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Class II glass ionomer/silver cermet restorations and their effect on interproximal growth of mutans streptococci.
    Berg JH; Farrell JE; Brown LR
    Pediatr Dent; 1990 Feb; 12(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 2119036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mutans streptococci in plaque from margins of amalgam, composite, and glass-ionomer restorations.
    Svanberg M; Mjör IA; Orstavik D
    J Dent Res; 1990 Mar; 69(3):861-4. PubMed ID: 2109000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.