These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. [Class II Tunnel restorations of glass-ionomer-silver-Cermet cement and composite]. Croll TP Quintessenz; 1989 Sep; 40(9):1577-88. PubMed ID: 2517954 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Glass ionomer-silver cermet Class II tunnel-restorations for primary molars. Croll TP ASDC J Dent Child; 1988; 55(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 2968382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Class II glass ionomer cermet tunnel, resin sandwich and amalgam restorations over 2 years. Wilkie R; Lidums A; Smales R Am J Dent; 1993 Aug; 6(4):181-4. PubMed ID: 7803004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Lateral-access Class II restoration using resin-modified glass-ionomer or silver-cermet cement. Croll TP Quintessence Int; 1995 Feb; 26(2):121-6. PubMed ID: 7568722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Reinforced glass ionomer restorations in modified Class II cavities]. Valenzuela V; Stanke F Odontol Chil; 1989 Apr; 37(1):209-13. PubMed ID: 2518367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fracture resistance of teeth with Class 2 silver amalgam, posterior composite, and glass cermet restorations. Jagadish S; Yogesh BG Oper Dent; 1990; 15(2):42-7. PubMed ID: 2374743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Occlusal glass ionomer cermet, resin sandwich and amalgam restorations: a 2-year clinical study. Lidums A; Wilkie R; Smales R Am J Dent; 1993 Aug; 6(4):185-8. PubMed ID: 7803005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An in vitro assessment of cavity margin finishing and marginal adaptation of tunnel restorations. Chalker SA; Lumley PJ Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1993 Jun; 1(4):151-6. PubMed ID: 8268839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Class II glass ionomer-silver restorations in primary molars. Stratmann RG; Berg JH; Donly KJ Quintessence Int; 1989 Jan; 20(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 2503851 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Class II glass ionomer/silver cermet restorations and their effect on interproximal growth of mutans streptococci. Berg JH; Farrell JE; Brown LR Pediatr Dent; 1990 Feb; 12(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 2119036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Tunnel restorations. A 3 1/2-year follow up study of Class I and II tunnel restorations in permanent and primary teeth. Hasselrot L Swed Dent J; 1993; 17(5):173-82. PubMed ID: 8291027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Glass-ionomer-silver-cermet interim Class I restorations for permanent teeth. Croll TP; Killian CM Quintessence Int; 1992 Nov; 23(11):731-3. PubMed ID: 1305287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Marginal leakage of Class II glass-ionomer-silver restorations, with and without posterior composite coverage: an in vitro study. Guelmann M; Fuks AB; Holan G; Grajower R ASDC J Dent Child; 1989; 56(4):277-82. PubMed ID: 2503551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical and histologic observations of glass ionomer-silver cermet restorations in six human primary molars. Croll TP; Riesenberger RE; Miller AS Quintessence Int; 1988 Dec; 19(12):911-9. PubMed ID: 2978277 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]