These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29787501)

  • 21. Diffusion-weighted imaging: Apparent diffusion coefficient histogram analysis for detecting pathologic complete response to chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer.
    Choi MH; Oh SN; Rha SE; Choi JI; Lee SH; Jang HS; Kim JG; Grimm R; Son Y
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jul; 44(1):212-20. PubMed ID: 26666560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Versus Standard Diffusion Imaging for Detection and Grading of Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer.
    Roethke MC; Kuder TA; Kuru TH; Fenchel M; Hadaschik BA; Laun FB; Schlemmer HP; Stieltjes B
    Invest Radiol; 2015 Aug; 50(8):483-9. PubMed ID: 25867657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A Whole-Tumor Histogram Analysis of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Maps for Differentiating Thymic Carcinoma from Lymphoma.
    Zhang W; Zhou Y; Xu XQ; Kong LY; Xu H; Yu TF; Shi HB; Feng Q
    Korean J Radiol; 2018; 19(2):358-365. PubMed ID: 29520195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted imaging and the apparent diffusion coefficient values in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions.
    Çabuk G; Nass Duce M; Özgür A; Apaydın FD; Polat A; Orekici G
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2015 Apr; 59(2):141-8. PubMed ID: 25564776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Two Different Methods of Region-of-Interest Placement for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions by Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value.
    Gity M; Moradi B; Arami R; Arabkheradmand A; Kazemi MA
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2018 Oct; 19(10):2765-2770. PubMed ID: 30360604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Quantitative Assessment of Breast Tumor: Comparison of Four Methods of Positioning Region of Interest for Synthetic Relaxometry and Diffusion Measurement.
    Gao W; Yang Q; Li X; Zhang Y; He T; Liang W; Wei X; Yang M; Gao B; Zhang G; Zhang S
    Acad Radiol; 2024 Aug; 31(8):3096-3105. PubMed ID: 38508932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Neuroendocrine liver metastases: Value of apparent diffusion coefficient and enhancement ratios for characterization of histopathologic grade.
    Besa C; Ward S; Cui Y; Jajamovich G; Kim M; Taouli B
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Dec; 44(6):1432-1441. PubMed ID: 27227756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) in evaluation of breast lesions: comparison with conventional DWI.
    Liu C; Liang C; Liu Z; Zhang S; Huang B
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Dec; 82(12):e782-9. PubMed ID: 24034833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Diffusion-weighted imaging in relation to morphology on dynamic contrast enhancement MRI: the diagnostic value of characterizing non-puerperal mastitis.
    Zhang L; Hu J; Guys N; Meng J; Chu J; Zhang W; Liu A; Wang S; Song Q
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Mar; 28(3):992-999. PubMed ID: 28956122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Region of interest demarcation for quantification of the apparent diffusion coefficient in breast lesions and its interobserver variability.
    Nogueira L; Brandão S; Matos E; Nunes RG; Ferreira HA; Loureiro J; Ramos I
    Diagn Interv Radiol; 2015; 21(2):123-7. PubMed ID: 25698095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Quantitative evaluation of benign and malignant vertebral fractures with diffusion-weighted MRI: what is the optimum combination of b values for ADC-based lesion differentiation with the single-shot turbo spin-echo sequence?
    Geith T; Schmidt G; Biffar A; Dietrich O; Duerr HR; Reiser M; Baur-Melnyk A
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):582-8. PubMed ID: 25148160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Histogram analysis of volume-based apparent diffusion coefficient in breast cancer.
    Park GE; Kim SH; Kim EJ; Kang BJ; Park MS
    Acta Radiol; 2017 Nov; 58(11):1294-1302. PubMed ID: 28273747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of the diagnostic performances of diffusion parameters in diffusion weighted imaging and diffusion tensor imaging of breast lesions.
    Cakir O; Arslan A; Inan N; Anık Y; Sarısoy T; Gumustas S; Akansel G
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Dec; 82(12):e801-6. PubMed ID: 24099642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Intravoxel Incoherent Motion and Quantitative Non-Gaussian Diffusion MR Imaging: Evaluation of the Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Several Markers of Malignant and Benign Breast Lesions.
    Iima M; Kataoka M; Kanao S; Onishi N; Kawai M; Ohashi A; Sakaguchi R; Toi M; Togashi K
    Radiology; 2018 May; 287(2):432-441. PubMed ID: 29095673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Apparent diffusion coefficient histogram in the differentiation of benign and malignant testicular tumors.
    Minh ND; Hung ND; Tuan TA; Hien MM; Tuan HX; Duc NM
    Int J Med Sci; 2024; 21(2):200-206. PubMed ID: 38169660
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Gliomas: Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient maps with standard- or high-b-value diffusion-weighted MR imaging--correlation with tumor grade.
    Kang Y; Choi SH; Kim YJ; Kim KG; Sohn CH; Kim JH; Yun TJ; Chang KH
    Radiology; 2011 Dec; 261(3):882-90. PubMed ID: 21969667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Retrospective Assessment of Histogram-Based Diffusion Metrics for Differentiating Benign and Malignant Endometrial Lesions.
    Kierans AS; Doshi AM; Dunst D; Popiolek D; Blank SV; Rosenkrantz AB
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2016; 40(5):723-9. PubMed ID: 27224233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast lesions: Region-of-interest placement and different ADC parameters influence apparent diffusion coefficient values.
    Bickel H; Pinker K; Polanec S; Magometschnigg H; Wengert G; Spick C; Bogner W; Bago-Horvath Z; Helbich TH; Baltzer P
    Eur Radiol; 2017 May; 27(5):1883-1892. PubMed ID: 27578047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in 3.0 Tesla Breast MRI: Diagnostic Performance and Tumor Characterization Using Small Subregions vs. Whole Tumor Regions of Interest.
    Arponen O; Sudah M; Masarwah A; Taina M; Rautiainen S; Könönen M; Sironen R; Kosma VM; Sutela A; Hakumäki J; Vanninen R
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0138702. PubMed ID: 26458106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Quantitative comparison of MR diffusion-weighted imaging for liver focal lesions between 3.0T and 1.5T: Regions of interest of the minimum-spot ADC, the largest possible solid part, and the maximum diameter in lesions.
    Tang Y; Wang H; Wang Y; Li J; Jia R; Ma L; Ye H
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Nov; 44(5):1320-1329. PubMed ID: 27080350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.