These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29787586)

  • 1. Procrustes-based geometric morphometrics on MRI images: An example of inter-operator bias in 3D landmarks and its impact on big datasets.
    Daboul A; Ivanovska T; Bülow R; Biffar R; Cardini A
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(5):e0197675. PubMed ID: 29787586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measurement error using a SeeMaLab structured light 3D scanner against a Microscribe 3D digitizer.
    Messer D; Svendsen MS; Galatius A; Olsen MT; Dahl VA; Conradsen K; Dahl AB
    PeerJ; 2021; 9():e11804. PubMed ID: 34484981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. High-Density Morphometric Analysis of Shape and Integration: The Good, the Bad, and the Not-Really-a-Problem.
    Goswami A; Watanabe A; Felice RN; Bardua C; Fabre AC; Polly PD
    Integr Comp Biol; 2019 Sep; 59(3):669-683. PubMed ID: 31243431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of automated landmark identification on morphometric analyses.
    Percival CJ; Devine J; Darwin BC; Liu W; van Eede M; Henkelman RM; Hallgrimsson B
    J Anat; 2019 Jun; 234(6):917-935. PubMed ID: 30901082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Automatic landmarking as a convenient prerequisite for geometric morphometrics. Validation on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)- based shape analysis of the nasal complex.
    Ridel AF; Demeter F; Galland M; L'abbé EN; Vandermeulen D; Oettlé AC
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Jan; 306():110095. PubMed ID: 31841934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reproducibility of facial soft tissue landmarks on facial images captured on a 3D camera.
    Othman SA; Ahmad R; Mericant AF; Jamaludin M
    Aust Orthod J; 2013 May; 29(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 23785939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is shape in the eye of the beholder? Assessing landmarking error in geometric morphometric analyses on live fish.
    Moccetti P; Rodger JR; Bolland JD; Kaiser-Wilks P; Smith R; Nunn AD; Adams CE; Bright JA; Honkanen HM; Lothian AJ; Newton M; Joyce DA
    PeerJ; 2023; 11():e15545. PubMed ID: 37605749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measurement error in μCT-based three-dimensional geometric morphometrics introduced by surface generation and landmark data acquisition.
    Engelkes K; Helfsgott J; Hammel JU; Büsse S; Kleinteich T; Beerlink A; Gorb SN; Haas A
    J Anat; 2019 Aug; 235(2):357-378. PubMed ID: 31062345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The problem of assessing landmark error in geometric morphometrics: theory, methods, and modifications.
    von Cramon-Taubadel N; Frazier BC; Lahr MM
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2007 Sep; 134(1):24-35. PubMed ID: 17503448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sharing is caring? Measurement error and the issues arising from combining 3D morphometric datasets.
    Fruciano C; Celik MA; Butler K; Dooley T; Weisbecker V; Phillips MJ
    Ecol Evol; 2017 Sep; 7(17):7034-7046. PubMed ID: 28904781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Operator variability in scan positioning is a major component of HR-pQCT precision error and is reduced by standardized training.
    Bonaretti S; Vilayphiou N; Chan CM; Yu A; Nishiyama K; Liu D; Boutroy S; Ghasem-Zadeh A; Boyd SK; Chapurlat R; McKay H; Shane E; Bouxsein ML; Black DM; Majumdar S; Orwoll ES; Lang TF; Khosla S; Burghardt AJ
    Osteoporos Int; 2017 Jan; 28(1):245-257. PubMed ID: 27475931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Low resolution scans can provide a sufficiently accurate, cost- and time-effective alternative to high resolution scans for 3D shape analyses.
    Marcy AE; Fruciano C; Phillips MJ; Mardon K; Weisbecker V
    PeerJ; 2018; 6():e5032. PubMed ID: 29942695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing Methods to Assess Intraobserver Measurement Error of 3D Craniofacial Landmarks Using Geometric Morphometrics Through a Digitizer Arm.
    Menéndez LP
    J Forensic Sci; 2017 May; 62(3):741-746. PubMed ID: 27874192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Errors in landmarking and the evaluation of the accuracy of traditional and 3D anthropometry.
    Kouchi M; Mochimaru M
    Appl Ergon; 2011 Mar; 42(3):518-27. PubMed ID: 20947062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. 2D or Not 2D? Testing the Utility of 2D Vs. 3D Landmark Data in Geometric Morphometrics of the Sculpin Subfamily Oligocottinae (Pisces; Cottoidea).
    Buser TJ; Sidlauskas BL; Summers AP
    Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2018 May; 301(5):806-818. PubMed ID: 29244247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bias and error in estimates of mean shape in geometric morphometrics.
    Rohlf FJ
    J Hum Evol; 2003 Jun; 44(6):665-83. PubMed ID: 12799158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Specific-age group sex estimation of infants through geometric morphometrics analysis of pubis and ischium.
    Estévez Campo EJ; López-Lázaro S; López-Morago Rodríguez C; Alemán Aguilera I; Botella López MC
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 May; 286():185-192. PubMed ID: 29587219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Geometric morphometrics of different malocclusions in lateral skull radiographs.
    Freudenthaler J; Čelar A; Ritt C; Mitteröcker P
    J Orofac Orthop; 2017 Jan; 78(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 27796401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Obtaining new resolutions in carnivore tooth pit morphological analyses: A methodological update for digital taphonomy.
    Courtenay LA; Herranz-Rodrigo D; Huguet R; Maté-González MÁ; González-Aguilera D; Yravedra J
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(10):e0240328. PubMed ID: 33031413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A repeatable geometric morphometric approach to the analysis of hand entheseal three-dimensional form.
    Karakostis FA; Hotz G; Scherf H; Wahl J; Harvati K
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2018 May; 166(1):246-260. PubMed ID: 29399778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.